Lower Dose of Sufentanil Does Not Enhance Fast Track Significantly-A Randomized Study.

OBJECTIVE: Adjustment in the doses of opioids has been a focus of interest for achieving better fast-track conditions in cardiac anesthesia, but relatively sparse information exists on the potential effect of psychologic and behavioral factors, such as stress, anxiety, and type of personality, on anesthesia requirements and patient turnover in the cardiac recovery unit (CRU); to the authors' knowledge, this particular focus has not been systematically investigated. In this randomized study, the authors tested the hypothesis that low-dose sufentanil, compared with a standard dose, can improve fast-track parameters and the overall quality of recovery. Opioid requirements related to personality type, pain sensitivity, and preoperative stress and anxiety also were assessed. DESIGN: A randomized, prospective study. PARTICIPANTS: The study comprised 60 patients scheduled for elective coronary artery bypass grafting with or without aortic valve replacement. SETTING: A university hospital. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomly assigned to receive either a standard dose (bolus 0.5 µg/kg) or low dose (bolus 0.25 µg/kg) of sufentanil combined with propofol. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The primary outcome variables were ventilation time and eligible time to discharge from the CRU. The secondary objective was to evaluate the relationship between opioid requirements and personality type, pain sensitivity, and preoperative stress and anxiety. The groups were comparable in selected demographics and perioperative parameters. There was no difference between groups in ventilation time (low dose: 191 [163-257] v standard dose: 205 [139-279] min; p = 0.405); eligible CRU discharge time (10.3 ± 5.0 v 10.3 ± 4.2 h; p = 0.978); or administration of postoperative morphine (25 [11-34) v 27 [10-39] g; p = 0.790). There was no difference between groups in total sufentanil administration and various preoperative psychologic and behavioral test levels nor in the time to reach bispectral index <50 during induction, except that personality type A demonstrated a longer induction time of 10 (8-12) minutes versus 6 (4-8) minutes in low-score patients. CONCLUSION: A lower dose of sufentanil, compared with a standard dose, does not enhance fast-track conditions significantly.

Colloids in Cardiac Surgery-Friend or Foe?

OBJECTIVE: The right choice of fluid replacement still is a matter of debate. Recently, two large-scale studies on the use of hydroxyethyl starches (HES) in the intensive care setting have been published, which have caused a huge shift in the daily practice of volume therapy. These results have been applied to patients outside intensive care. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact this change has had on the outcomes in a large population of cardiac surgery patients, with a focus on the type of colloid infusion. DESIGN: A prospective, registered, observational study, using propensity score matching. SETTING: Cohort study from 3 university hospitals using a common registry. PARTICIPANTS: The study comprised 17,742 patients who were referred for cardiac surgery from 2007 to 2014. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were divided in groups according to perioperative fluid replacement with either crystalloids or colloids. The colloid group was further divided into HES or human albumin (HA). Analyses were based on the following 3 subsections: HES versus crystalloids, HA versus crystalloids, and HES versus HA, with use of propensity score matching or direct matching of cases. Primary outcome parameters were 30-day and 6-month mortality, new postoperative renal replacement therapy, and new cardiac ischemic events. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The groups were fully comparable in individual analyses. The use of HES had no impact on new dialysis and 30-day mortality. A Cox proportional regression analysis showed that HES had no impact on 6-month mortality and new postoperative ischemic events. When comparing HA with crystalloid use, a significantly increased risk in crude analysis was demonstrated on all outcome parameters; and when comparing HA with HES, a significantly higher risk was observed in HA patients in mortality parameters and new postoperative, but after adjustment, only the risk of new postoperative dialysis persisted. CONCLUSION: This study underlined the difficulties in establishing hardcore outcome data, even in large cohort studies. The findings seemed to diminish the magnitude of risk when using HES in cardiac surgery patients and seriously questioned the choice of HA when a plasma expander is needed.

High thoracic epidural analgesia in cardiac surgery. Part 1--high thoracic epidural analgesia improves cardiac performance in cardiac surgery patients.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the perioperative cardioprotective effect of high thoracic epidural analgesia (HTEA), primarily expressed as an effect on cardiac performance and hemodynamics in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. DESIGN: A randomized, prospective study. PARTICIPANTS: Sixty low-to-moderate risk patients between the ages of 65 and 80 years scheduled for elective coronary artery bypass graft surgery with or without aortic valve replacement. SETTING: A university hospital. INTERVENTION: Patients randomized to receive HTEA as a supplement to general anesthesia. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Perioperative hemodynamic measurements, perioperative fluid balance, and postoperative release of cardiac enzymes were collected. The end-diastolic volume index (EDVI), the stroke volume index (overall 38 v 32 mL), the cardiac index (overall 2.35 v. 2.18 L/minute/m(2)), the central venous pressure, and central venous oxygenation were higher in the HTEA group. The mean arterial blood pressure was marginally lower in the HTEA group, whereas no difference was noted in the heart rate or peripheral saturation between the groups. No differences were found in the postoperative levels of troponin T and CK-MB between groups. NT-proBNP changed over time (p < 0.001) and was lower in the HTEA group (p = 0.013), with maximal values of 291 ± 265 versus 326 ± 274. CONCLUSIONS: The findings of a higher stroke volume index and central venous oxygenation without an increase in heart rate or mean arterial pressure suggest that HTEA improves cardiac performance in elderly cardiac surgery patients.

High thoracic epidural analgesia in cardiac surgery. Part 2--high thoracic epidural analgesia does not reduce time in or improve quality of recovery in the intensive care unit.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the postoperative effect of high thoracic epidural analgesia on the time in the intensive care unit (ICU) and the quality of cardiac recovery in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. DESIGN: A randomized prospective study. PARTICIPANTS: Sixty low-risk patients 65 to 80 years of age scheduled for elective coronary artery bypass graft surgery with or without aortic valve replacement. SETTING: A university hospital. INTERVENTIONS: Patients randomized to receive high thoracic epidural analgesia (HTEA) as a supplement to general anesthesia. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The eligible time to discharge from the ICU and the quality of recovery were evaluated by an objective ICU scoring system. The time to eligible discharge from the ICU, the ventilation time, and the actual time in the ICU were not shorter in the HTEA group compared with patients receiving conventional general anesthesia. Patients receiving HTEA in addition to general anesthesia received less morphine postoperatively but with no consequent beneficial effect on respiration, nausea, sedation, or motor function. CONCLUSIONS: HTEA does not reduce the time in the ICU or improve the quality of recovery in the ICU.

Transfusion of blood during cardiac surgery is associated with higher long-term mortality in low-risk patients.

OBJECTIVE: Numerous reports have emphasized the need for reduction in transfusions of allogeneic red blood cells (RBC) due to increased morbidity and mortality. Nevertheless, transfusion rates are still high in several cardiac surgery institutions. Reports on long-term survival after cardiac surgery and RBC transfusion are few. METHODS: Data from the Western Denmark Heart Registry (WDHR) were used to identify all (25,117) adult cardiac surgery performed in four centres during 1999-2010. Patients with multiple entries (1049), re-do cardiac surgery (985), special/complex procedures (2329), dying within 30 days (668) and not eligible for follow-up (85) were excluded leaving a cohort of 20,001. Registration in the WDHR is mandatory. WDHR and the unique Danish Civil Registration System with continuous sequential updates of the Danish population ensure that all patients and outcomes are accounted for. RESULTS: Kaplan-Meier survival plot for low-risk patients (EuroSCORE 0-4), undergoing simple cardiac surgery showed a significantly lower estimated survival after >4500 days (0.637 vs. 0.745) when receiving perioperative RBC transfusion (P<0.0001). The difference was less evident in patients with EuroSCORE 5-9 (0.373 vs. 0.4436, P<0.0001), while high-risk patients showed no difference. Adjusted risk ratio, after RBC transfusion, containing among others age, sex, EuroSCORE and diabetes, was 1.83 (95% CI (confidence interval) 1.67-2.01). The survival rate was independent of up till six units of RBC. CONCLUSION: Long-term follow-up of low-risk patients undergoing simple cardiac surgery demonstrates a more than 10% higher mortality when receiving perioperative RBC transfusion. Even transfusion of 1-2 units seems to carry a risk of that magnitude.