ABSTRACT
In this work a method of using Kodak X-Omat V film to measure beam profiles for dynamically wedged fields is presented. Also, the profiles determined by film measurement are compared with those measured with an ion chamber (0.12 cm3 Scanditronix RFA 300 RK) and an array of silicon diodes (11 channel Scanditronix linear diode array). The beam investigated is a 6 MV photon beam from a Varian 2100 C linear accelerator. The geometric method of positioning film and determining the central axis (CAX) position of the beam yielded results which agreed to within 1 mm with the software determined position of the CAX. The profiles measured by film agreed well with the ion chamber measured profiles in terms of overall field size, position, penumbral width, height and position of maximum and profile shape between the 20% dose levels. Film profiles deviated most from ion chamber profiles in the post-penumbra regions. Linear diode array (LDA) measured profiles matched ion chamber profiles in the post-penumbra regions, field size and general profile shape. In the region of maximum dose differences in dose of up to 4% were seen along with horizontal shifts of around 2 mm between LDA and ion chamber profiles.
Subject(s)
Radiometry/instrumentation , Radiometry/methods , Biophysical Phenomena , Biophysics , Densitometry/instrumentation , Densitometry/methods , Evaluation Studies as Topic , Humans , Particle Accelerators , Photons , Technology, Radiologic , X-Ray FilmABSTRACT
One feature of the dynamic wedge is the improved flatness of the beam profile in the nonwedged direction when compared to fixed wedges. Profiles in the nonwedged direction for fixed wedges show a fall-off in dose away from the central axis when compared to the open field profile. This study will show that there is no significant difference between open field profiles and nonwedged direction profiles for dynamically wedged beams. The implications are that the dynamic wedge offers an improved dose distribution in the nonwedged direction that can be modelled by approximating the dynamically wedged field to an open field. This is possible as both the profiles and depth doses of the dynamically wedged fields match those of the open fields, if normalized to dmax of the same field size. For treatment planning purposes the effective wedge factor (EWF) provides a normalization factor for the open field depth dose data set. Data will be presented to demonstrate that the EWF shows relatively little variation with depth and can be treated as being independent of field size in the nonwedged direction.
