Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
1.
Curr Pharm Teach Learn ; 13(3): 288-291, 2021 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33641740

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Acceptance to pharmacy school relies on data such as grade point average (GPA) and Pharmacy College Admission Test (PCAT) scores in addition to holistic review. The interview is the final step in finding successful applicants. This study sought to identify if faculty interviewers had an impact on prospective students' decisions to accept an offer of admission to our college of pharmacy. METHODS: A seven-year retrospective review of applicants granted an offer of admission was conducted. Analyses determined if interviewer assignment impacted yield of students matriculating into the program. RESULTS: Fifty-two different faculty interviewed 1634 applicants who were subsequently offered admission during the seven-years of review; of these applicants, 482 matriculated (yield 29.5%). Ten faculty interviewers provided 1020 (62.4%) of these interviews, with 302 applicants matriculating (yield 29.6%). Univariate analysis of these 10 interviewers did not find a significant difference in yield. Matriculation between the highest and lowest yielding faculty members trended toward a difference but was not statistically significant. Lower cumulative GPA, lower quantitative PCAT, lack of a bachelor's degree or higher, and interviewing later in the admissions cycle correlated with a higher matriculation yield (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Faculty interviewers did not impact an applicant's decision to accept an offer of admission to pharmacy school. Interviewing late in the admissions cycle, not having a bachelor's degree, lower cumulative GPA, and lower quantitative PCAT score correlated with increased matriculation yield.


Subject(s)
School Admission Criteria , Schools, Pharmacy , Faculty , Humans , Prospective Studies , Retrospective Studies , Students
3.
Am J Emerg Med ; 28(3): 296-303, 2010 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20223386

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: This study proposes that intranasal (IN) naloxone administration is preferable to intravenous (IV) naloxone by emergency medical services for opioid overdoses. Our study attempts to establish that IN naloxone is as effective as IV naloxone but without the risk of needle exposure. We also attempt to validate the use of the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) in opioid intoxication. METHODS: A retrospective chart review of prehospital advanced life support patients was performed on confirmed opioid overdose patients. Initial and final unassisted respiratory rates (RR) and GCS, recorded by paramedics, were used as indicators of naloxone effectiveness. The median changes in RR and GCS were determined. RESULTS: Three hundred forty-four patients who received naloxone by paramedics from January 1, 2005, until December 31, 2007, were evaluated. Of confirmed opioid overdoses, change in RR was 6 for the IV group and 4 for the IN group (P = .08). Change in GCS was 4 for the IV group and 3 for the IN group (P = .19). Correlations between RR and GCS for initial, final, and change were significant at the 0.01 level (rho = 0.577, 0.462, 0.568, respectively). CONCLUSION: Intranasal naloxone is statistically as effective as IV naloxone at reversing the effects of opioid overdose. The IV and IN groups had similar average increases in RR and GCS. Based on our results, IN naloxone is a viable alternative to IV naloxone while posing less risk of needle stick injury. Additionally, we demonstrated that GCS is correlated with RR in opioid intoxication.


Subject(s)
Drug Overdose/drug therapy , Naloxone/administration & dosage , Narcotic Antagonists/administration & dosage , Opioid-Related Disorders/drug therapy , Administration, Intranasal , Adult , Aged , Chi-Square Distribution , Female , Humans , Injections, Intravenous , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Statistics, Nonparametric , Treatment Outcome
4.
Resuscitation ; 81(1): 42-6, 2010 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19913979

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Naloxone's use in cardiac arrest has been of recent interest, stimulated by conflicting results in both human case reports and animal studies demonstrating antiarrhythmic and positive ionotropic effects. We hypothesized that naloxone administration during cardiac arrest, in suspected opioid overdosed patients, is associated with a change in cardiac rhythm. METHODS: From a database of 32,544 advanced life support (ALS) emergency medical dispatches between January 2003 and December 2007, a retrospective chart review was completed of patients receiving naloxone in cardiac arrest. Forty-two patients in non-traumatic cardiac arrest were identified. Each patient received naloxone because of suspicion by a paramedic of acute opioid use. RESULTS: Fifteen of the 36 (42%) (95% confidence interval [CI]: 26-58) patients in cardiac arrest who received naloxone in the pre-hospital setting had an improvement in electrocardiogram (EKG) rhythm. Of the participants who responded to naloxone, 47% (95% CI: 21-72) (19% [95% CI: 7-32] of all study subjects) demonstrated EKG rhythm changes immediately following the administration of naloxone. DISCUSSION: Although we cannot support the routine use of naloxone during cardiac arrest, we recommend its administration with any suspicion of opioid use. Due to low rates of return of spontaneous circulation and survival during cardiac arrest, any potential intervention leading to rhythm improvement is a reasonable treatment modality.


Subject(s)
Heart Arrest/chemically induced , Heart Arrest/drug therapy , Naloxone/therapeutic use , Narcotic Antagonists/therapeutic use , Narcotics/poisoning , Adult , Aged , Confidence Intervals , Drug Overdose , Electrocardiography , Emergency Medical Services/organization & administration , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome
5.
Prehosp Emerg Care ; 13(1): 71-4, 2009.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19145528

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The investigation seeks to determine the prevalence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) on the stethoscopes of emergency medical services (EMS) providers. While stethoscopes are known fomites for MRSA, the prevalence of MRSA in the prehospital setting is not well documented in the literature. METHODS: This was a prospective, observational cohort study of 50 stethoscopes provided by consecutive, consenting EMS providers at our academic emergency department (ED). Stethoscopes were swabbed with saline culture applicators and samples were cultured on a commercial MRSA test kit containing mannitol salt agar with oxacillin. After 72 hours of incubation at 37 degrees C, two emergency physicians and one microbiologist analyzed the plates independently. MRSA colonization was recorded as positive if all three reviewers agreed that colonization had occurred. RESULTS: Of 50 stethoscopes, 16 had MRSA colonization, and 16 (32%) EMS professionals had no recollection of when their stethoscopes had been cleaned last. Reported length of time since last cleaning was grouped into six categories: one to seven days, eight to 14 days, 15 to 30 days, 31 to 180 days, 181 days to 365 days, and unknown. The median time frame reported since the last cleaning was one to seven days. In the model, an increase from one time category to the next increased the odds of MRSA colonization by 1.86 (odds ratio = 1.86, p = 0.038). CONCLUSIONS: In this ED setting, MRSA was found on approximately one in three stethoscopes of EMS professionals. A longer length of time since the last stethoscope cleaning increased the odds of MRSA colonization.


Subject(s)
Emergency Medical Technicians , Equipment Contamination/statistics & numerical data , Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus/isolation & purification , Stethoscopes/microbiology , Cohort Studies , Colony Count, Microbial , Cross Infection/etiology , Decontamination/statistics & numerical data , Humans , New Jersey/epidemiology , Prevalence
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...