Allogeneic vs. Autologous Skin Grafts in the Therapy of Patients with Burn Injuries: A Restrospective, Open-label Clinical Study with Pair Matching.

BACKGROUND: Early application of autologous skin may lead to the loss of split thickness skin graft due to unclarified wound bed. Allogeneic skin grafts are performed on patients with extensive burn injuries after escharotomy, tangential excisions and deep debridement for the purpose of stabilizing the general condition and reducing the scope of local complications. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this paper is to determine how the use of allografts improves the conditions for the intake of autografts in burns treatment, and how it accelerates wound healing in comparison to the autografts-only option. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In 2012-2013, allogeneic skin was grafted on 46 patients, and in 8 cases grafting was repeated several times. An autologous split-thickness skin graft was applied to 32 patients. The analysis included the relationship between the duration of hospitalization and the number of skin transplantations, the relationship between the time of admission to debridement of the necrotic tissues and the total duration of hospitalization. Statistical analysis encompassed also pain assessment. RESULTS: The results suggest that multiple applications of autografts not only do not lead to quicker recovery, but even lengthen the hospitalization time. The dependency is visible also in the patients who underwent the skin grafting procedure in allogeneic and autologous systems twice or more. There was a statistical significant difference between the duration of hospitalization in groups of patients who underwent STSG preceded by allogeneic skin graft transplantation when compared to the group of patients who underwent allogeneic skin application (p < 0.05) and the group of patients who were grafted with autologous skin (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Allogeneic skin grafts are a perfect dressing when wound vascularization is insufficient to take free split-thickness skin graft. In patients with comparable burn surface areas, multiple applications of free autologous split-thickness skin grafts (STSG) extend the hospitalization time in comparison to application of allogeneic skin dressing as the first-line therapy.

Endoscopic evidence of reflux disease in the larynx.

CONCLUSION: The severity of laryngeal mucosal lesions in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is significantly greater than in controls. A higher degree of laryngeal mucosal injury is documented in patients in whom GERD is associated with more advanced esophageal lesions. OBJECTIVES: (1) To confirm the presence of inflammatory lesions in the laryngopharynx of patients with GERD. (2) To analyze the relationship between the severity of laryngopharyngeal and esophageal lesions on the basis of the reflux finding score (RFS) and the Los Angeles (LA) scale of esophageal mucosal injury. METHODS: The study included 92 subjects, among them 46 patients with GERD and 46 individuals without endoscopic evidence of esophageal lesions, qualified for routine endoscopy due to other indications. The endoscopic images of the inferior pharynx, larynx, and esophagus were analyzed during the video-endoscopic examination of the upper gastrointestinal tract. The laryngeal images were assessed according to RFS criteria and the numeric value of RFS was calculated. The degree of esophageal mucosal injury was described according to the LA scale. RESULTS: Both global RFS score and the scores of all RFS parameters except the presence of granulomatous tissue were significantly higher in patients with GERD than in the controls. Patients in whom GERD was associated with more severe esophageal lesions (group B according to the LA scale) had significantly higher global RFS score and scores of all analyzed parameters of laryngeal injury except subglottic edema than individuals in whom the degree of esophageal involvement was classified as group A.