Performance evaluation of serum PIVKA-II measurement using HISCL-5000 and a method comparison of HISCL-5000, LUMIPULSE G1200, and ARCHITECT i2000.

BACKGROUND: Protein induced by vitamin K antagonist-II (PIVKA-II), in addition to alpha-fetoprotein, is a useful tumor marker for diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). We evaluated the analytical performance of the HISCL-5000 analyzer (Sysmex Corporation) in the measurement of serum PIVKA-II. METHODS: We evaluated the precision and linearity of PIVKA-II assays using the HISCL-5000 analyzer. Methods using HISCL-5000, LUMIPULSE G1200 (Fujirebio Diagnostics), and ARCHITECT i2000 (Abbott Diagnostics) were compared according to the guidelines of the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. A total of 501 subjects (median age 59 years, age range 24-90 years) were enrolled. Among them, 335 were HCC patients, 46 were patients with non-HCC liver disease, and 120 were healthy individuals. Non-HCC liver disease included liver cirrhosis, chronic hepatitis, HBV or HCV carrier, hepatic adenoma, and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. RESULTS: Repeatability (%CV) in low- and high-level controls and pooled serum was 2.81%-10.30%, and within-laboratory precision was 4.24%-8.86%. In a linearity test, the coefficient of determination (R2 ) was 0.9957, ranging from 11 to 69 897 mAU/mL. In comparison, the coefficient of correlation (r) was 0.9561-0.9644, agreement was 93.4%-97.6%, and the κ value was 0.855-0.945 among the three analyzers. About 99.2% of healthy individuals and 84.8% of non-HCC liver disease patients were below the cutoff value (40 mAU/mL) on HISCL-5000. CONCLUSIONS: A PIVKA-II assay using HISCL-5000 showed acceptable analytical performance including precision, linearity, and method comparison. This indicates that HISCL-5000 can be potentially helpful in clinical laboratories.

Comparative Evaluation of QuantiFERON-TB Gold In-Tube and QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus in Diagnosis of Latent Tuberculosis Infection in Immunocompromised Patients.

QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus (QFT-Plus) is a new-generation QuantiFERON-TB Gold In-Tube (QFT-GIT) assay which has two antigen-coated tubes called TB1, which contains long peptides derived from ESAT-6 and CFP-10, and TB2, which contains the same components as TB1 and additional short peptides which potentially stimulate CD8+ T cells through the presentation of major histocompatibility complex class I. This is the first study to compare QFT-Plus and QFT-GIT for use in the diagnosis of latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) among immunocompromised patients in the Republic of Korea. Among 317 consecutive patients who underwent screening for LTBI before solid organ or hematopoietic stem cell transplantation and tumor necrosis factor alpha inhibitor treatment, LTBI was identified in 92 (29.0%) and 88 (27.8%) patients by QFT-GIT and QFT-Plus, respectively. The rate of concordance between QFT-GIT and QFT-Plus was 93.7% (κ value, 0.860), and the indeterminate rate (3.2%) was similar between QFT-GIT and QFT-Plus. Of 20 (6.3%) samples with discordant results, 11 (55.0%) and 7 (35.0%) were positive by QFT-GIT alone and QFT-Plus alone, respectively, and 2 (15.0%) were indeterminate by each assay. The interferon gamma level in samples with discordant results ranged from 0.39 to 1.10 IU/ml, except for one sample, in which the gamma interferon level was 2.97 IU/ml only in TB2. Conclusively, there was a high degree of agreement between the results of QFT-GIT and QFT-Plus for the screening of immunocompromised patients for LTBI. The reactivity in TB2 contributed substantially to the difference between QFT-GIT and QFT-Plus, particularly in solid organ transplant candidates. The significance of the discrete responses in TB1 and TB2 of QFT-Plus needs to be explored further by means of an immunological and clinical approach in different patient groups and clinical settings.

ABO Mistyping of cis-AB Blood Group by the Automated Microplate Technique.

BACKGROUND: The cis-AB phenotype, although rare, is the relatively most frequent of ABO subgroups in Koreans. To prevent ABO mistyping of cis-AB samples, our hospital has applied a combination of the manual tile method with automated devices. Herein, we report cases of ABO mistyping detected by the combination testing system. METHODS: Cases that showed discrepant results by automated devices and the manual tile method were evaluated. These samples were also tested by the standard tube method. The automated devices used in this study were a QWALYS-3 and Galileo NEO. Exons 6 and 7 of the ABO gene were sequenced. RESULTS: 13 cases that had the cis-AB allele showed results suggestive of the cis-AB subgroup by manual methods, but were interpreted as AB by either automated device. This happened in 87.5% of these cases by QWALYS-3 and 70.0% by Galileo NEO. Genotyping results showed that 12 cases were ABO*cis-AB01/ABO*O01 or ABO*cis-AB01/ABO*O02, and one case was ABO*cis-AB01/ ABO*A102. CONCLUSION: Cis-AB samples were mistyped as AB by the automated microplate technique in some cases. We suggest that the manual tile method can be a simple supplemental test for the detection of the cis-AB phenotype, especially in countries with relatively high cis-AB prevalence.

Performance evaluation of the QMAC-dRAST for staphylococci and enterococci isolated from blood culture: a comparative study of performance with the VITEK-2 system.

Objectives: To evaluate the performance of a rapid antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) platform based on microfluidic chip technology, the QMAC-dRAST, which enables AST from colony isolates or positive blood culture broth (PBCB), and to compare the performance of the QMAC-dRAST for staphylococci and enterococci with that of the VITEK-2 system based on reference broth microdilution (BMD). Methods: A total of 110 staphylococcal and enterococcal isolates from blood cultures were included. AST was performed directly using the QMAC-dRAST with PBCB. Thereafter, colony isolates derived from subculture of PBCB were used for the QMAC-dRAST, the VITEK-2 system and BMD. Results: The overall agreement between the QMAC-dRAST with PBCB and BMD was 91.5%. There were 1.2% very major errors (VMEs), 4.3% major errors (MEs) and 5.4% minor errors (mEs). The QMAC-dRAST with colony isolates yielded 94.6% agreement and error rates of 1.0% VMEs, 1.8% MEs and 4.0% mEs. The VITEK-2 system showed 96.2% agreement and error rates of 2.3% VMEs, 0.5% MEs and 2.6% mEs. The incubation time in the QMAC-dRAST was significantly shorter than in the VITEK-2 system (median of 6 versus 10 h; P < 0.0001). Conclusions: The QMAC-dRAST system provided rapid results and represents an alternative to conventional AST methods. The QMAC-dRAST with colony isolates produced more reliable results for staphylococci and enterococci than the QMAC-dRAST with PBCB. The QMAC-dRAST system also performed comparably to BMD and the VITEK-2 system.