ABSTRACT
AIMS: Direct and indirect evidence were combined in this systematic-review and network meta-analysis (NMA) to assess and compare the effect of nutritional supplements on glycemic control, and rank the supplements accordingly. METHODS: PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched up to April 2021. We included randomized controlled trials that investigated the effect of vitamins D, C, and E, magnesium, zinc, calcium, selenium, and omega-3 on at least one glycemic marker, including glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), fasting blood sugar (FBS), homeostasis model assessment-estimated insulin resistance (HOMA-IR), HOMA-B, and insulin, in adults with type 2 diabetes. To estimate effectiveness of supplements, a random-effects NMA in the Bayesian framework was applied. To assess risk of bias, Cochrane Collaboration Tool was used. RESULTS: Analysis of 178 studies indicated that zinc, vitamin D, omega-3, vitamin C, and vitamin E were effective in reducing HbA1c with low certainty. For reduction of FBS, zinc, vitamin D, and vitamin C, and for HOMA-IR, vitamin D were effective with low certainty. None of the supplements were effective in the reduction of insulin and HOMA-B with low certainty. After excluding poor-quality studies, only vitamin D was significantly effective in reducing all of the markers. Consistently, when the analysis was restricted to studies with a duration of ≥12-weeks, vitamin D reduced HbA1c, FBS, and HOMA-IR. CONCLUSIONS: Vitamin D supplementation was more effective compared to other supplements in improving HbA1c, FBS, and HOMA-IR, albeit with low certainty of evidence. This result was confirmed by low-risk of bias studies. REGISTRATION: CRD42021240691.
Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 , Selenium , Adult , Ascorbic Acid , Bayes Theorem , Blood Glucose , Calcium , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/drug therapy , Dietary Supplements , Glycated Hemoglobin , Glycemic Control , Humans , Insulin/therapeutic use , Magnesium , Network Meta-Analysis , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Vitamin D/therapeutic use , Vitamin E , Vitamins/therapeutic use , ZincABSTRACT
PURPOSE: The purpose of the current study was to investigate the diagnostic performance of radiolabeled amino acid PET for detection of pseudoprogression (PsP) of brain tumor after treatment through a systematic review and meta-analysis. METHODS: The PubMed and EMBASE database, from the earliest available date of indexing through 15 February 2019, were searched for studies evaluating the diagnostic performance of radiolabeled amino acid PET for detection of PsP. We determined the sensitivities and specificities across studies, calculated positive and negative likelihood ratios, and constructed summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curves. RESULTS: Across seven results from six studies (971 patients), the pooled sensitivity was 0.89 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.82-0.94] without heterogeneity (I2 = 0.0) and a pooled specificity of 0.88 (95% CI: 0.76-0.94) without heterogeneity (I2=29.4). Likelihood ratio syntheses gave an overall positive likelihood ratio of 7.3 (95% CI: 3.6-14.7) and negative likelihood ratio of 0.12 (95% CI: 0.07-0.21). The pooled diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) was 60 (95% CI: 23-152). Hierarchical SROC curve indicates that the areas under the curve (AUC) was 0.92 (95% CI: 0.90-0.94). CONCLUSION: The current meta-analysis showed the good sensitivity and specificity of radiolabeled amino acid PET for detection of PsP of brain tumor after treatment. Also, the DOR was high and SROC curve showed high AUC value.
