Influence of Plasma Concentration of Hsa-Mir-370-3p and Cyp2d6*4 On Equilibrium Concentration of Phenazepam in Patients with Recurrent Depressive Disorder.

Introduction: Phenazepam is commonly administered to patients diagnosed with major depressive disorder. Some proportion of such patients do not show adequate response to treatment regimen containing phenazepam, whereas many of them experience type A adverse drug reactions. Previous studies showed that CYP2D6 IS involved in the biotransformation of phenazepam, the activity of which is highly dependent on the polymorphism of the gene encoding it. Objective. The objective of the study was to evaluate the impact of 1846G>A polymorphism of the CYP2D6 gene on the concentration/dose indicator of phenazepam, using findings on enzymatic activity of CYP2D6 (as evaluated by the 6M-THBC/pinoline ratio measurement) and on CYP2D6 expression level obtained by measuring the hsa-miR-370-3p plasma concentration levels in patients suffering from major depressive disorder. Material and methods: The study enrolled 191 patients with recurrent depressive disorder (age -40.0 ± 16.3 years). Treatment regimen included phenazepam in an average daily dose of 6.0 ± 2.3 mg per day. Treatment efficacy was assessed using the validated psychometric scales. Therapy safety was assessed using the UKU Side-Effect Rating Scale. For genotyping and estimation of the microRNA (miRNA) plasma levels we performed the real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR Real-time). The activity of CYP2D6 was evaluated using the HPLC-MS/MS method by the content of the endogenous substrate of given isoenzyme and its metabolite in urine (6M-THBC/pinoline). Therapeutic drug monitoring has been performed using HPLC-MS/MS. Results: Our findings didn't reveal the statistically significant results in terms of the treatment efficacy evaluation (HAMA scores at the end of the treatment course): (GG) 6.0 [4.0; 8.0] and (GA) 6.0 [5.0; 7.8], p > 0.999; the statistical significance in the safety profile was not obtained (the UKU scores): (GG) 3.0 [2.0; 4.0] and (GA) 3.0 [3.0; 3.0], p > 0.999. We didn't reveal a statistical significance for concentration/dose indicator of phenazepam in patients with different genotypes: (GG) 0.812 [0.558; 1.348] and (GA) 0.931 [0.630; 1.271], p = 0.645). Analysis of the results of the pharmacotranscriptomic part of the study didn't show the statistically significant difference in the hsa-miR-370-3p plasma levels in patients with different genotypes: (GG) 22.5 [16.9; 29.8], (GA) 22.7 [15.7; 31.5], p = 0.695. At the same time, correlation analysis didn't reveal a statistically significant relationship between the phenazepam efficacy profile evaluated by changes in HAMA scale scores and the hsa-miR-370-3p plasma concentration: rs = -0.01, p = 0.866. Also, we didn't reveal the correlation between the miRNA concentration and safety profile: rs = 0.07, p = 0.348. Also we did not reveal the relationship between the CYP2D6 enzymatic activity (as evaluated by 6M-THBC/pinoline ratio measurement) and the hsa-miR-370-3p plasma concentration: rs = -0.14, p = 0.056. At the same time, correlation analysis did not reveal a statistically significant relationship between the phenazepam concentration and the hsa-miR-370-3p plasma concentration: rs = -0.05, p = 0.468. Conclusion: The effect of genetic polymorphism of the CYP2D6 gene on the efficacy and safety profiles of phenazepam was not demonstrated in a group of 191 patients with recurrent depressive disorder. At the same time, hsa-miR-370-3p does not remain a promising biomarker for assessing the level of CYP2D6 expression, because it does not correlate with encoded isoenzyme activity.

Impact of the Omics-Based Biomarkers on the Mirtazapine's Steady-State Concentration, Efficacy and Safety in Patients with Affective Disorders Comorbid with Alcohol Use Disorder.

Introduction: Mirtazapine is commonly administered to patients with recurrent depressive disorder. Some of these patients do not show adequate response to the therapy with mirtazapine, whereas many of them experience dose-dependent adverse drug reactions. Previous research revealed that CYP2D6 is involved in the metabolism of mirtazapine, the activity of which is highly dependent on the polymorphism of the gene encoding it. Objective: The objective of this study was to investigate the effect of polymorphisms of the CYP3A4, CYP2C9, CYP3A5, ABCB1, CYP2C19, SCL6A4, and 5-HTR2A genes on the concentration/dose indicator of mirtazapine and on the CYP3A expression level obtained by measuring the miR-27b plasma concentration levels in patients suffering from a recurrent depressive disorder. Material and Methods: Our study included 108 patients with recurrent depressive disorder (average age - 35.2 ± 15.1 years). The treatment regimen included mirtazapine in an average daily dose of 45.0 [30.0; 60.0] mg per week. Therapy efficacy was assessed using the international psychometric scales. Therapy safety was assessed using the UKU Side-Effect Rating Scale. For genotyping and estimation of the microRNA (miRNA) plasma levels, we performed the real-time polymerase chain reaction. The activity of CYP3A was evaluated using the HPLC-MS/MS method by the content of the endogenous substrate of the given isoenzyme and its metabolite in urine (6b-HC/cortisol). Therapeutic drug monitoring has been performed using HPLC-MS/MS. Results: Our study didn't reveal any statistically significant results in terms of the treatment efficacy and safety of the therapy. We also didn't reveal a statistical significance for the concentration/dose indicator of mirtazapine in patients with different genotypes. Analysis of the results of the pharmacotranscriptomic part of the study didn't demonstrate the statistically significant difference in the miR-27b plasma levels in patients with different genotypes. At the same time, correlation analysis didn't reveal a statistically significant relationship between the mirtazapine efficacy profile evaluated by changes in HAMD scale scores and the miR-27b plasma concentration: rs = -0.2, p = 0.46. Also, we didn't reveal the correlation between the miRNA concentration and safety profile: rs = 0.029, p = 0.93. In addition, we didn't reveal the relationship between the CYP3A enzymatic activity and the miR-27b plasma concentration: rs = -0,188, p = 0.85. However, the difference in the CYP3A enzymatic activity in carriers of AG and GG genotypes of the 6986A > G polymorphism of CYP3A5 gene has been revealed: (AG) 4.75 [1.28; 7.34] vs (GG) 8.83 [4.73; 13.62], p-value = 0.023. Conclusion: Thus, the effect of genetic polymorphism of the CYP3A4, CYP2C9, CYP2C9, CYP3A5, ABCB1, CYP2C19, CYP2C19, CYP2C19, SCL6A4, 5-HTR2A gene on the efficacy and safety profiles of mirtazapine was not demonstrated in a group of 108 patients with depressive disorder and alcohol use disorder.

Impact of the Omics-Based Biomarkers on the Fluvoxamine's Steady-State Concentration, Efficacy and Safety in Patients with Affective Disorders Comorbid with Alcohol Use Disorder.

Introduction: Fluvoxamine is commonly administered to patients with recurrent depressive disorder. Some of these patients do not show adequate response to the therapy with fluvoxamine, whereas many of them experience dose-dependent adverse drug reactions. Previous research revealed that CYP2D6 is involved in the metabolism of fluvoxamine, the activity of which is highly dependent on the polymorphism of the gene encoding it. Objective: The objective of this study was to investigate the effect of polymorphisms of the CYP3A4, CYP2C9, CYP3A5, ABCB1, CYP2C19, SCL6A4, and 5-HTR2A genes on the concentration/dose indicator of fluvoxamine and on the CYP3A expression level obtained by measuring the miR-27b plasma concentration levels in patients suffering from a recurrent depressive disorder. Material and Methods: Our study included 105 patients with recurrent depressive disorder (average age - 37.5 ± 13.2 years). The treatment regimen included fluvoxamine in an average daily dose of 117.6 ± 44.3 mg per week. Therapy efficacy was assessed using the international psychometric scales. Therapy safety was assessed using the UKU Side-Effect Rating Scale. For genotyping and estimation of the microRNA (miRNA) plasma levels, we performed the real-time polymerase chain reaction. The activity of CYP3A was evaluated using the HPLC-MS/MS method by the content of the endogenous substrate of the given isoenzyme and its metabolite in urine (6b-HC/cortisol). Therapeutic drug monitoring has been performed using HPLC-MS/MS. Results: Our study didn't reveal any statistically significant results in terms of the treatment efficacy and safety of the therapy. We also didn't reveal a statistical significance for the concentration/dose indicator of fluvoxamine in patients with different genotypes. Analysis of the results of the pharmacotranscriptomic part of the study didn't demonstrate the statistically significant difference in the miR-27b plasma levels in patients with different genotypes. At the same time, correlation analysis didn't reveal a statistically significant relationship between the fluvoxamine efficacy profile evaluated by changes in HAMD scale scores and the miR-27b plasma concentration: rs = -0.012, p = 0.63. Also, we didn't reveal the correlation between the miRNA concentration and safety profile: rs = -0.175, p = 0.30. In addition, we didn't reveal the relationship between the CYP3A enzymatic activity and the miR-27b plasma concentration: rs = -0.197, p < 0.32. However, the difference in the CYP3A enzymatic activity in carriers of AG and GG genotypes of the 6986A > G polymorphism of CYP3A5 gene has been revealed: (AG) 4.72 [1.18; 8.45] vs (GG) 9.23 [5.12; 15.53], p-value = 0.23. Conclusion: Thus, the effect of genetic polymorphism of the CYP3A4, CYP2C9, CYP2C9, CYP3A5, ABCB1, CYP2C19, CYP2C19, CYP2C19, SCL6A4, 5-HTR2A gene on the efficacy and safety profiles of fluvoxamine was not demonstrated in a group of 105 patients with depressive disorder and alcohol use disorder.

Effects of CYP2C19 genetic polymorphism on the steady-state concentration of citalopram in patients with major depressive disorder.

Citalopram is commonly prescribed to patients suffering from major depressive disorder. Some of them do not respond adequately to therapy with citalopram, while many of them experience type A adverse drug reactions. Current research revealed that CYP2C19 isoenzyme is involved in the biotransformation of citalopram. The objective of our study was to investigate the impact of 681G>A polymorphism of the CYP2C19 gene on the efficacy, safety and the concentration/dose indicator of citalopram. Our study enrolled 130 patients with major depressive disorder and comorbid alcohol use disorder (average age-38.7 ± 14.1 years). Therapy regimen included citalopram in an average daily dose of 31.1 ± 14.4 mg per week. Therapy efficacy and safety were evaluated using the international psychometric scales. For genotyping, we performed the real-time polymerase chain reaction. Our findings revealed the statistically significant results in terms of the treatment efficacy evaluation (HAMD scores at the end of the treatment course): (GG) 8.0 [8.0; 9.0] and (GA) 10.0 [9.0; 11.0], p < 0.001. In the safety profile (the UKU scores), the statistical significance was also obtained: (GG) 3.0 [3.0; 4.0] and (GA) 5.0 [4.0; 5.0], p < 0.001. We revealed a statistical significance for concentration/dose indicator of citalopram in patients with different genotypes: (GG) 2.543 [1.659; 4.239] and (GA) 4.196 [2.643; 5.753], p < 0.001). The effect of CYP2C19 genetic polymorphism on the efficacy and safety profiles of citalopram was demonstrated in a group of 130 patients with major depressive disorder.

[The pharmacogenetics of hypoglycemia and the glycemic variability at the patients ith type 2 diabetes mellitus].

AIM: To investigate the link between the hypoglycemia (registrated accurately by the professional Continuous Glucose Monitoring CGM; severe hypoglycemia at home) and the hetero-/homozygote carriage of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) of cytochrome systems geneCYP2C9(rs1799853CYP2C9*2 иrs1057910CYP2C9*3) at the patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) used sulphonylurea (SU). MATERIALS AND METHODS: In Study Case-Control 120 T2DM-SU-patients genotyped by SNPs of geneCYP2C9(using PCR-RT) had been done the professional CGM (System iPro2, Medtronic) recorded Time in Range of Hypoglycemia (TIR-HYPO), level of Minimal CGM-hypoglycemia (MinGl) and standard CGM-parameters of Glycemic Variability. Severe hypoglycemia at home was recorded from visit to visit. The odds ratio (OR) of metabolic disturbances had been assessed for carriage SNPs in comparison with wide alleles. RESULTS: The Study established that carriage of SNPsrs1799853andrs1057910geneCYP2C9at T2DM-SU-patients associated with rising of Glycemic Variability and frequency of CGM-hypoglycemia (MinGl decreasing, increasing of TIR-HYPO and number of Glycemia Excursion 4 mmol/L/h), as well as increasing severe hypoglycemia at home (p0.05). Thus, OR at the carriage ofrs1799853andrs1057910respectively equaled: for CGM-hypoglycemia 7.78 (3.0220.01) and 5.80 (0.23145.87); number of Glycemia Excursion 4 mmol/L/h 5.76 (2.2914.43) and 4.44 (1.4313.76); MinGl3.9 mmol/L 4.39 (1.7910.75) and 6.26 (1.8421.30); CV40% (vs30%) 3.63 (1.0412.62) and 15.22 (0.59393.94);p0.05. CONCLUSION: At the real clinical practice the assessment of carriage of SNPs of geneCYP2C9before inclusion of SU to glucose-lowering scheme of T2DM-therapy it necessary to carry out for the detecting patients with a higher risk of hypoglycemia and rising of Glycemic Variability.

CYP2C19*17 May Increase the Risk of Death Among Patients with an Acute Coronary Syndrome and Non-Valvular Atrial Fibrillation Who Receive Clopidogrel and Rivaroxaban.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study is to assess the influence of gene CYP2C19, CYP3A4, CYP3A5 and ABCB1 polymorphisms on clopidogrel antiplatelet activity, rivaroxaban concentration equilibrium, and clinical outcomes among patients with acute coronary syndrome and non-valvular atrial fibrillation. METHODS: In the multicenter prospective registry study of the efficacy and safety of a combined antithrombotic therapy 103 patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation both undergoing or not a percutaneous coronary intervention were enrolled. The trial assessed the primary outcomes (major bleeding, in-hospital death, cardiovascular death, stroke\transient ischaemic attack, death/renal insufficiency) and secondary outcomes (platelet reactivity units (PRU), rivaroxaban concentration). RESULTS: For none of the clinical outcomes when combined with other covariates, the carriership of polymorphisms CYP3A5*3 rs776746, CYP2C19*2 rs4244285;*17 rs12248560, ABCB1 3435 C>T, ABCB1 rs4148738 was significant. None of the markers under study (CYP3A5*3 rs776746, CYP2C19*2 rs4244285, *17 rs12248560, ABCB1 3435 C>T, ABCB1 rs4148738) has proven to affect rivaroxaban equilibrium concentration in blood plasma among patients with atrial fibrillation and acute coronary syndrome. CONCLUSION: In situations of double or triple antithrombotic rivaroxaban and clopidogrel therapy among patients with atrial fibrillation and acute coronary syndrome, the genetic factors associated with bleeding complications risk (CYP2C19*17) may prove to be clinically relevant.

Effects of plasma concentration of micro-RNA Mir-27b and CYP3A4*22 on equilibrium concentration of alprazolam in patients with anxiety disorders comorbid with alcohol use disorder.

Alprazolam is used in the treatment of patients with anxiety disorders comorbid with alcohol use disorder. Some proportion of these patients does not respond adequately to treatment with alprazolam, while many of them experience dose-dependent adverse drug reactions. Results of the previous studies have shown that CYP3A is involved in the biotransformation of alprazolam, the activity of which is dependent, inter alia, on the polymorphism of the encoding gene. OBJECTIVE: The objective of our study was to investigate the effect of 99366316G>A polymorphism of the CYP3A4 gene on the concentration/dose indicator of alprazolam in patients with anxiety disorders comorbid with alcohol use disorder, using findings on enzymatic activity of CYP3A (as evaluated by the 6-beta-hydroxy-cortisol/cortisol ratio measurement) and on CYP3A4 expression level obtained by measuring the miR-27b plasma concentration levels in patients with anxiety disorders comorbid with alcoholism. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Our study enrolled 105 patients with anxiety disorders comorbid with alcohol use disorder (age - 37.8±14.6 years). Therapy included alprazolam in an average daily dose of 5.6±2.4 mg per day. Treatment efficacy was evaluated using the psychometric scales. Therapy safety was assessed using the UKU Side-Effect Rating Scale. For genotyping and estimation of the microRNA (miRNA) plasma levels, we performed the real-time polymerase chain reaction. The activity of CYP3A was evaluated using the HPLC-MS/MS method by the content of the endogenous substrate of the given isoenzyme and its metabolite in urine (6- beta-hydroxy-cortisol/cortisol). Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) has been performed using HPLC-MS/MS. RESULTS: Our study revealed the statistically significant results in terms of the treatment efficacy evaluation (HAMA scores at the end of the treatment course): (GG) 3.0 [2.0; 5.0] and (GA) 4.0 [4.0; 5.0], p = 0.007; at the same time, the statistical significance in the safety profile was not obtained (the UKU scores): (GG) 3.0 [2.0; 3.8] and (GA) 3.0 [1.5; 4.0], p = 0.650. We revealed a statistical significance for concentration/dose indicator of alprazolam in patients with different genotypes: (GG) 1.583 [0.941; 2.301] and (GA) 2.888 [2.305; 4.394], p = 0.001). Analysis of the results of the pharmacotranscriptomic part of the study didn't show the statistically significant difference in the miR-27b plasma levels in patients with different genotypes: (GG) 25.6 [20.4; 28.8], (GA) 25.7 [19.7; 33.1], p = 0.423. At the same time, correlation analysis revealed a statistically significant relationship between the alprazolam efficacy profile evaluated by changes in HAMA scale scores and the miR-27b plasma concentration: rs = 0.20, p = 0.042. Also, we didn't reveal the correlation between the miRNA concentration and safety profile: rs = 0.15, p = 0.127. In addition, we revealed the relationship between the CYP3A enzymatic activity (as evaluated by 6-beta-hydroxycortisol/ cortisol ratio measurement) and the miR-27b plasma concentration: rs = -0.27, p = 0.006. At the same time, correlation analysis revealed a statistically significant relationship between the alprazolam concentration and the miR-27b plasma concentration: rs = 0.28, p = 0.003. CONCLUSION: The effect of genetic polymorphism of the CYP3A4 gene on the efficacy and safety profiles of alprazolam was demonstrated in a group of 105 patients with anxiety disorders comorbid with alcohol use disorder. At the same time, miR-27b remains a promising biomarker for assessing the level of CYP3A4 expression, because it correlates with the encoded isoenzyme's activity.

Genotyping and phenotyping CYP3A4\CYP3A5: no association with antiplatelet effect of clopidogrel.

The objective of this study was to determine the impact of polymorphism of CYP3A subfamily isoenzymes (allelic variants of CYP3A4*22 and CYP3A5*3) on the efficacy clopidogrel in patients with an acute coronary syndrome (ACS), who have undergone percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Platelet activity was determined on a VerifyNow P2Y12 test system in 81 patients with ACS aged 37-91 who had PCI. The activity of CYP3A4/5 was expressed as the ratio of the concentrations of cortisol and 6ß-hydroxycortisol was performed by using high performance liquid chromatography. Genotyping was performed by using real-time polymerase real-time chain reaction. The frequencies for the CYP3A5 gene, rs 776746, were identified as follows: 77 (95.1%)-CC, 4 (4.9%)-CT; the allele frequencies by loci for the CYP3A4, rs rs35599367, were as follows: 78 (96.3%)-GG, 3 (3.7%)-AG. There was no statistically significant genotype-dependent difference between the presence of a minor T and G alleles and the presence of clopidogrel resistance (OR 3.53; 95% CI 0.46-26.94; p = 0.233 and p = 0.443, respectively). The average level of the metabolic relationship (6ß-hydroxycortisol/cortisol) between the clopidogrel-resistant group and the normal platelet reactivity group was not statistically significantly different: 3.3 ± 2.8 versus 3.2 ± 3.2; p = 0.947. So, the activity of CYP3A4/5 was not related to platelet aggregation rates in this model. Genotyping and phenotyping CYP3A4\CYP3A5 does not predict the antiplatelet effect of clopidogrel. More extensive research is required to establish their clinical relevance.

Effects of CYP2D6 activity on the efficacy and safety of mirtazapine in patients with depressive disorders and comorbid alcohol use disorder.

The objective of the study was to investigate the effects of CYP2D6 activity on the efficacy and safety of mirtazapine in patients with depressive disorders and comorbid alcohol use disorder who received mirtazapine. The study included 109 Russian patients who received mirtazapine at a dose of 30.0 [15.0; 45.0] mg per day. Genotyping of CYP2D6*4 (1846G > A, rs3892097) was performed using real-time polymerase chain reaction with allele-specific hybridization. The activity of CYP2D6 was evaluated by determining the concentration of endogenous substrate of the enzyme and its urinary metabolite - pinoline to 6-hydroxy-1,2,3,4-tetrahydro-beta-carboline ratio, using high-performance liquid chromatography - mass spectrometry. The statistically significant differences between the scores on the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD) in patients with different genotypes were revealed by day 16: (GG) 5.0 [3.0; 6.0], (GA) 1.5 [1.0; 3.2] (p < 0.001), and for the The UKU Side Effects Rating Scale (UKU): (GG) 6.0 [6.0; 7.0], (GA) 8.5 [8.0; 10.0] (p < 0.001). The calculation of correlation coefficients between the differences in scale scores and metabolic rate showed the presence of statistically significant weak inverse correlation with the efficacy indicator evaluated by HAMD (r = -0.278, p < 0.05), but not by UKU (r = 0.274, p > 0.05). This study demonstrated that an increased CYP2D6 activity reduces the efficacy of treatment with mirtazapine.

[Pharmacogenetic approaches to predicting the efficiency and safety of amlodipine in patients with arterial hypertension]. / Farmakogeneticheskie podkhody v prognozirovanii éffektivnosti i bezopasnosti amlodipina u bol'nykh arterial'noi gipertenziei.

An open, non-comparative, prospective clinical study was conducted to evaluate the antihypertensive efficacy and tolerability of amlodipine, a calcium antagonist, in patients with arterial hypertension (AH) I-II stages, depending on the genotype for the polymorphic marker C3435T of the ABCB1 gene. The study included 100 patients with AH I-II stages, aged from 45 to 58 years. The initial dose of amlodipine was 5 mg, duration of treatment was 12 weeks. General clinical examination methods, office measurement and daily blood pressure monitoring, tolerance evaluation, and genotyping using the ABCB1 polymorphic marker C3435T by the PCR-RFLP method (polymerase chain reaction and restriction fragment length polymorphism) were used. The statistical analysis of results was carried out using the Mann-Whitney U test for quantitative variables, Kruskal-Wallis one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) for three independent groups of quantitative data. Excellent antihypertensive efficacy with the CC genotype was found in 11.8% patients, with CT - 33.9%, with TT - 43.3%; good - 35.3%, 32.1%, and 33.3% respectively, satisfactory - 52.9%, 34,0% and 23.4% respectively. Six patients with the CT genotype and nine patients with the CC genotype required the increase in the dose to 10 mg. The number of patients with Adverse drug reactions (ADR) were found in 35.3% of patients with the CC genotype, 6.7% with the TT genotype and 11.3% with the CT genotype. The Kruskal-Wallis test revealed significant differences between CC and TT genotypes in the degree of decrease in SBP (p=0.02), antihypertensive efficacy parameter (p=0.02), an increase in dose requirements (p = 0.04) and the incidence of ADR(p=0.05). In AH patients (I-II stage) with the TT genotype of the C3435T gene polymorphism one can expect higher rates of antihypertensive efficacy of amlodipine in combination with a good safety profile and the lowest ADR percentage, while patients with the CC genotype more likely to develop ADR and lower antihypertensive responsiveness.