ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: We aim to compare TRAK & TPS based isodose volumes in cervical cancer brachytherapy and assess the feasibility, accuracy and potential future implications of TRAK in this regard and as a newer emerging tool to assess treatment intensity in cervical cancer brachytherapy. METHODS: one hundred patients with histologically proven squamous cell carcinoma of cervix uteri were assessed for brachytherapy (after completion of external radiation) and prospectively enrolled for the study. 60 Gy, 75 Gy, and 85 Gy isodose volumes were obtained from the TPS (VTPS) for 50, 25 & 25 patients with Manchester, Fletcher & interstitial implant respectively, receiving various fractionation schedules by Ir192 HDR remote after-loading system. Using the formula Vpred=4965(TRAK/dref)3/2+170(TRAK/dref)-1.5 the TRAK based isodose surface volumes (Vpred) were derived. Reference doses (dref) were calculated based on accumulated EBRT and brachytherapy doses. The two sets of volume were compared with respect to applicator type, standard, and optimised plan. Surrogate point A dose was also correlated. RESULT: VTPS - Vpred were 5.24 ± 2.7%, all volumes being predicted within 10%. Correlation of TRAK vs VTPS60/ VTPS75/ VTPS85 showed R2 of 0.994, 0.987 and 0.971 respectively. There was no significant difference in predicted volumes with respect to applicator type. The surrogate point A showed mean volume and standard deviation of 7.44 ± 13.4%, 17.63 ± 16.38 and 3.5 ± 0.95 for Manchester optimised, Fletcher optimised and standard plans respectively. TRAK with point A (R2=0.5632), bladder (R2=0.2015) and rectal doses (R2=0.121) yielded no correlation. CONCLUSION: Volumes calculated by TRAK correlate with TPS obtained volumes significantly and the formula predicting isodose surface volumes within 10% accuracy for ICBT applications and not for pure interstitial implants. However, TRAK fails to correlate with surrogate point A, bladder and rectal doses hence has questionable utility as a marker for biological response & treatment intensity.
Subject(s)
Brachytherapy , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms , Female , Humans , Radiotherapy Dosage , Brachytherapy/methods , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted/methods , Dose Fractionation, RadiationABSTRACT
PURPOSE: To evaluate feasibility and safety of execution of optimized intra-cavitary brachytherapy (ICBT) plan of first fraction in subsequent fractions in high-volume, low-resource centers. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This non-randomized prospective study included 30 cervical cancer patients, who underwent 4 fractions of high-dose-rate (HDR)-ICBT in 2 applications, one week apart, 2 fractions per application delivered on two consecutive days. Computed tomography (CT) simulation was done before each fraction, organs at risk (OARs) were contoured on all sets of CT images. Optimized plans were generated for each set of CT images and executed for the treatment. Test treatment plans were retrospectively generated by applying first treatment fraction's dwell times adjusted for decay, and dwell positions of the applicator for subsequent treatment fractions paired t-test was performed to analyze D2cc dose variations of OARs among the paired sets of plans. RESULTS: Comparison between the plans showed daily plans provided lower D2cc to OARs than test plans. In intra-application plan comparison, there was a significant dose reduction to 2 cc sigmoid (p = 0.021) and bladder (p = 0.007) in daily plan. Mean D2cc of optimized and unoptimized plans were 361.35 ±114.01 and 411.70 ±152.73 for sigmoid, and 511.23 ±85.47 cGy and 553.57 ±111.23 cGy for bladder, respectively. In inter-application, D2cc rectum and sigmoid demonstrated a statistically significant dose variation (p = 0.002) and (p = 0.007), with mean D2cc rectum of optimized and unoptimized plans being 401.06 ±83.53 cGy and 452.46 ±123.97 cGy, and of 2 cc sigmoid 340.84 ±117.90 cGy and 387.79 ±141.36 cGy, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Fractionated HDR brachytherapy amounts to significant variation in OAR doses if re-simulation and re-plan is not performed for every fraction and ICBT application. Therefore, plan of the day with optimization of the doses to target and OARs must be followed for each fraction.
