ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Visual impairment is frequent and highly disabling in Parkinson's disease (PD); however, few studies have comprehensively evaluated its impact on vision-related quality of life. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the relationship between visual function tests and the visual impairment perceived by PD patients in daily living activities. METHODS: We cross-sectionally evaluated 62 PD patients and 33 healthy controls (HC). Visual disability was measured with a comprehensive battery of primary visual function and visual cognition tests (visual outcomes), and vision-related quality of life was evaluated with the National Eye Institute 25-Item Visual Function Questionnaire (NEI VFQ-25). The relationship between visual outcomes and NEI VFQ-25 sub-scores was analyzed with Pearson's correlations and stepwise linear regression. RESULTS: In PD patients, and not in HC, most NEI VFQ-25 sub-scores were significantly correlated with Cube Analysis and Dot Counting from Visual Object and Space Perception (VOSP) battery (visual perception), Clock Drawing Test (visuoconstructive capacity) and Trail Making Test part-A (visual attention and processing speed) and to a lesser extent with high- and low-contrast visual acuity. Dot Counting (VOSP) was the test primarily associated with most NEI VFQ-25 sub-scores (5 out of 12). Roth-28 color test was the one that best explained the variance of Peripheral Vision (R2: 0.21) and Role Difficulties (R2: 0.36) sub-scores of NEI VFQ-25, while photopic contrast sensitivity explained 41% of Driving sub-score variance. CONCLUSION: Vision-related quality of life in PD is mainly influenced by alterations in visual perception, visuoconstructive capacity and visual attention and processing speed. Future studies are warranted to confirm and further extend our findings.
Subject(s)
Parkinson Disease , Quality of Life , Humans , Parkinson Disease/complications , Sickness Impact Profile , Surveys and Questionnaires , Vision Disorders/etiology , Visual AcuityABSTRACT
INTRODUCCIÓN: El test de aprendizaje verbal de Hopkins revisado (HVLT-R) se creó originalmente con el objetivo de proporcionar un test de aprendizaje y memoria verbal corto y con seis versiones paralelas que permitieran su readministración. OBJETIVO: Obtener datos normativos y estandarizados para el HVLT-R adaptado a las características sociodemográficas de la población española actual. Sujetos y métodos: El estudio se enmarca dentro del proyecto Normacog, para el cual se evaluó a 700 participantes (rango de edad: 18-90 años). Se analizó el efecto de la edad, el nivel educativo y el sexo sobre el rendimiento del HVLT-R, y se crearon los percentiles y las puntuaciones escalares ajustadas por edad y nivel educativo. RESULTADOS: Se observó un efecto significativo de la edad y el nivel educativo sobre las variables analizadas del test, que explicaba entre el 15 y el 29% de la varianza (ensayo 1, recuerdo total, ensayo 4, índice de discriminación). Como era de esperar, a mayor edad y menor nivel educativo, el rendimiento en el HVLT-R fue menor en todas las variables analizadas. Sin embargo, el sexo presentó un efecto significativo únicamente en las variables ensayo 1, recuerdo total e índice de discriminación. CONCLUSIÓN: Este estudio presenta baremos estandarizados y normalizados para el HVLT-R para población española, y ofrece normas actuales para los clínicos e investigadores. Los resultados confirman la influencia de la edad y la educación en todos los indicadores del test, por lo que se aportan datos que permiten corregir el HVLT-R teniendo en cuenta dichas características
INTRODUCTION: The Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-revised (HVLT-R) was originally created with the objective of providing a short verbal memory and learning test with six alternative forms that allow the re-administration. AIM: To obtain normative and standardized data for the HVLT-R taking into account the sociodemographic characteristics of the current Spanish population. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: The study is part of the Normacog Project. Seven hundred participants (18 to 90 years old) were assessed. The effect of age, level of education and gender on the performance of HVLT-R were analyzed, and percentiles and scalar scores adjusted by age and level of education were created. RESULTS: A significant effect of age and educational level on the analyzed variables of the test was observed, explaining from 15% to 29% of the variance (trial 1, total recall, trial 4, discrimination index). As expected, the older and less educated obtained lower performance in all the analyzed variables of the HVLT-R. However, sex only had a significant effect on the variables trial 1, total recall and discrimination index. CONCLUSION. This study provides standardized and normalized data for the HVLT-R for the Spanish population, offering current norms to clinicians and researchers. The results confirm the influence of age and level of education on all the indicators of the test, so normative data are provided to correct the HVLT-R taking into account these characteristics
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Adolescent , Young Adult , Adult , Middle Aged , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Verbal Learning/physiology , Educational Measurement/standards , Cognitive Dysfunction/therapy , Memory/physiology , Neuropsychological Tests/standards , Educational Status , Spain , Reference Standards , 28599 , Analysis of Variance , Mental Recall/physiologyABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a chronic autoimmune disease. Its most prevalent manifestation is neuropsychiatric SLE (NP-SLE), which is characterized by increased involvement of the nervous system, with relevant symptoms, such as marked cognitive deficits, which are directly involved in subsequent functional disability. The objective of this study is to identify and compare the profile of cognitive deficits in patients with NP-SLE and patients with non-neuropsychiatric SLE (nonNP-SLE) by means of a systematic review and meta-analysis. METHODS: We performed a systematic literature search based on the key words "cogn* OR neurocogn* AND lupus AND neuropsychiatry*" and included articles published between April 1999 and December 2016. A total of 244 articles were retrieved. We excluded reviews and meta-analyses, experiments not performed in humans, and single case reports. We included studies that used standardized cognitive measures and had included at least the subgroups NP-SLE and non NP-SLE. RESULTS: The meta-analysis was finally based on six studies, and 10 neuropsychological variables were examined. Significant differences were observed between the groups for six variables. In the remaining four variables, we observed marked heterogeneity between the groups or a low number of studies. CONCLUSIONS: The data obtained indicate greater cognitive impairment among NP-SLE patients than among nonNP-SLE patients, at least for the cognitive domains of visuomotor coordination, attention, executive function, visual learning and memory, and phonetic fluency. The identification and definition of cognitive deficits in SLE patients is necessary to develop adequate cognitive remediation programs to improve functional outcomes. (JINS, 2018, 24, 629-639).
