ABSTRACT
Sixty-one patients with obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS), 26 of whom also had chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), received treatment by nasal continuous positive airways pressure (nCPAP). To evaluate the effects of this device on daytime lung function, we analyzed pulmonary function tests before treatment with nCPAP and after a mean follow-up period of 12 months (range: 2-22 months). In patients with both OSAS and COPD, we observed a significant decrease in PaCO2 (p < 0.007), in airways resistance (p < 0.002) and in residual volume (p < 0.01); for these same patients we recorded increases in forced vital capacity (p < 0.04) and maximum inspiratory pressure (p < 0.02). We saw no change in lung function in patients with OSAS only. PaO2 increased after treatment in the 15 patients who were initially hypoxemic (p < 0.001). We conclude that after treatment with nCPAP, the greatest changes in respiratory function occur in patients with both OSAS and COPD, who also experience slight decrease in body weight. These changes may be explained by a decrease in auto-PEEP and weight loss.
Subject(s)
Lung/physiopathology , Positive-Pressure Respiration , Sleep Apnea Syndromes/therapy , Adult , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Lung Diseases, Obstructive/physiopathology , Lung Diseases, Obstructive/therapy , Male , Middle Aged , Positive-Pressure Respiration/methods , Respiratory Function Tests , Sleep Apnea Syndromes/physiopathology , Time FactorsABSTRACT
This study analyzes the role of dehumidifiers in asthma prophylaxis. The efficacy of dehumidifiers in the reduction of Dermatophagoides in the bedrooms of 9 patients with specific allergies was evaluated, along with success in reducing in high concentrations of mite allergens (D. pteronissinus I). Results were compared with those for a control group of 8 patients with the same allergy. In the group in whose homes a dehumidifier was installed, there was a significant reduction in relative humidity in the bedroom (54.84 +/- 4.33% and 45.23 +/- 4.92%; p < 0.05) as well as a significant decreased in concentrations of D. pteronissinus I (2.313 +/- 1.831 to 0.42 +/- 0.44 microgram/g; p < 0.05). This was not the case of patients in the control group (51.15 +/- 7.38% to 60.5 +/- 6.15%; p < 0.05 and 3.28 micrograms/g +/- 4.46 to 4.24 +/- 5.10; p = NS).