Impact of sex differences on the feasibility and safety of distal radial access for coronary procedures: a multicenter prospective observational study.

BACKGROUND: Conventional transradial access in women is associated with a lower success rate and a higher incidence of spasm compared to men. To date, the effect of sex on the performance of distal radial access (DRA) has not been fully elucidated. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of sex on catheterization success and other performance parameters of DRA procedures. METHODS: This is a prospective three-center observational study. From August 2020 to September 2022, data from all consecutive patients who underwent DRA for coronary procedures were collected. RESULTS: A total of 868 procedures were registered and stratified into two groups according to sex: women (n = 258) and men (n = 610). Female patients had less favorable baseline characteristics than male patients in terms of absent or weak pulse (29% vs. 17%; P  < 0.001), distal radial diameter (2.2 ±â€…0.3 vs. 2.4 ±â€…0.4 mm; P  < 0.001) and proximal radial diameter (2.5 ±â€…0.7 vs. 2.7 ±â€…0.7 mm; P  = 0.001). No differences in success rates were found in women compared to men (94.2% vs. 96.6%; P  = 0.135), with a higher presence of arterial spasm in women (5.8% vs. 3.0%; P  = 0.044). The preprocedural ultrasound evaluation was the only predictor of DRA success [odds ratio = 20.0 (4.739-83.333); P  < 0.001]. CONCLUSION: In patients undergoing coronary procedures, the success rate of DRA was high regardless of sex, with a higher incidence of arterial spasm in women.

Arteritis de Takayasu: iluminando su afección coronaria / Illuminating coronary artery involvement in takayasu arteritis

No disponible

Long-term prognostic value of peak exercise echocardiogram in patients hospitalized with acute chest pain.

INTRODUCTION: Peak exercise echocardiogram (EEcho) has shown reasonable sensitivity and specificity in detecting significant coronary artery disease (CAD). The objective was to evaluate the prognostic value of EEcho in patients hospitalized for acute chest pain (CP) and its additional prognostic information regarding exercise electrocardiogram test (EECG). METHODS: Prospective observational study performed between May 2011 and September 2013, including 250 patients consecutively admitted for acute CP with normal cardiac biomarkers and nondiagnostic electrocardiogram. All patients were prospectively followed for 1 year, and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) were recorded: cardiac death, nonfatal myocardial infarction (MI), or angina with coronary revascularization. RESULTS: EEcho was positive in 16%. Patients with positive EEcho had a higher incidence of hypertension and higher TIMI risk score, showing significant CAD in 66%. We observed contradictory results (EECG-EEcho) in 20%. Patients with positive EEcho and negative EECG had significant CAD in the 66%, and patients undergoing coronary angiography with negative EEcho and positive EECG did not show significant coronary artery disease. Only positive EEcho (P<.001, HR 0.169; 95% CI, 0.088-0.250) and atrial fibrillation (P<.025, HR 0.125; 95% CI, 0.016-0.233) were independently associated with MACE during follow-up. In patients with negative EEcho, the presence of MACE was 2%. CONCLUSIONS: EEcho in patients hospitalized for acute chest pain presents good ability to diagnose acute coronary syndrome, while providing additional information when combined with an EECG in up to 20% of cases. Moreover, a negative EEcho in this cohort seems to provide prognostic information beyond the acute event to predict long-term MACE.

Insuficiencia aórtica sistólica. ¿Un emergente marcador pronóstico en pacientes con insuficiencia cardiaca? / Systolic aortic regurgitation. A new prognostic marker in heart failure patients?

No disponible