Variation of Corrosion Rate, Vcorr, during the Carbonation-Induced Corrosion Propagation Period in Reinforced Concrete Elements.

The structural systems of residential buildings in many developed countries have widely utilized reinforced concrete as the most common solution in construction systems since the early 20th century. The durability of reinforced concrete columns and beams is compromised, in most cases, by pathologies caused by the corrosion of their reinforcements. This study analyses the corrosion processes induced by carbonation in 25 buildings with reinforced concrete structures. The models estimate the service life of reinforced concrete elements by differentiating between the initiation period and the propagation period of damage, considering two possible stages: the time of corrosion propagation until the cracking of the concrete cover, and the time of propagation until a loss of section is considered unacceptable for structural safety. However, the mathematical expressions that model the propagation periods consider the same corrosion rate in both cases. This research has found that the average corrosion rate in elements with an unacceptable loss of reinforcement section was in the order of 8 times higher than the corrosion rate in cracked columns and beams without a loss of reinforcement. This opens up a path to improve the definition of the different stages experienced by a reinforced concrete element suffering corrosion of its reinforcements due to carbonation, because once the concrete has cracked, the corrosion rate increases significantly.

Report of RILEM TC 281-CCC: outcomes of a round robin on the resistance to accelerated carbonation of Portland, Portland-fly ash and blast-furnace blended cements.

Many (inter)national standards exist to evaluate the resistance of mortar and concrete to carbonation. When a carbonation coefficient is used for performance comparison of mixtures or service life prediction, the applied boundary conditions during curing, preconditioning and carbonation play a crucial role, specifically when using latent hydraulic or pozzolanic supplementary cementitious materials (SCMs). An extensive interlaboratory test (ILT) with twenty two participating laboratories was set up in the framework of RILEM TC 281-CCC 'Carbonation of Concrete with SCMs'. The carbonation depths and coefficients determined by following several (inter)national standards for three cement types (CEM I, CEM II/B-V, CEM III/B) both on mortar and concrete scale were statistically compared. The outcomes of this study showed that the carbonation rate based on the carbonation depths after 91 days exposure, compared to 56 days or less exposure duration, best approximates the slope of the linear regression and those 91 days carbonation depths can therefore be considered as a good estimate of the potential resistance to carbonation. All standards evaluated in this study ranked the three cement types in the same order of carbonation resistance. Unfortunately, large variations within and between laboratories complicate to draw clear conclusions regarding the effect of sample pre-conditioning and carbonation exposure conditions on the carbonation performance of the specimens tested. Nevertheless, it was identified that fresh and hardened state properties alone cannot be used to infer carbonation resistance of the mortars or concretes tested. It was also found that sealed curing results in larger carbonation depths compared to water curing. However, when water curing was reduced from 28 to 3 or 7 days, higher carbonation depths compared to sealed curing were observed. This increase is more pronounced for CEM I compared to CEM III mixes. The variation between laboratories is larger than the potential effect of raising the CO2 concentration from 1 to 4%. Finally, concrete, for which the aggregate-to-cement factor was increased by 1.79 in comparison with mortar, had a carbonation coefficient 1.18 times the one of mortar. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1617/s11527-022-01927-7.

Quantification of Chlorides and Sulphates on Concrete Surfaces Using Portable X-ray Fluorescence. Optimization of the Measurement Method Using Monte Carlo Simulation.

A correct assessment of the pathologies that can affect a reinforced concrete structure is required in order to define the repair procedure. This work addresses the challenge of quantifying chlorides and sulphates directly on the surface of concrete. The quantification was carried out by means of X-ray fluorescence analysis on the surface of concrete specimens at different points with portable equipment. Concrete prisms were made with different amounts of NaCl and Na2SO4. To avoid the influence of coarse aggregate, a qualitative estimate of the amount of coarse aggregate analyzed has been made, although the results show that there is no significant influence. Monte Carlo simulations were carried out in order to establish the necessary number of random analyses of the mean value to be within an acceptable range of error. In the case of quantifying sulphates, it is necessary to carry out six random analyses on the surface, and eight measurements in the case of quantifying chlorides; in this way, it is ensured that errors are below 10% in 95% of the cases. The results of the study highlight that a portable XRF device can be used in situ to obtain concentrations of chlorides and sulphates of a concrete surface with good accuracy. There is no need to take samples and bring them to a laboratory, allowing lower overall costs in inspection and reparation works.

Use of a Handheld X-ray Fluorescence Analyser to Quantify Chloride Ions In Situ: A Case Study of Structural Repair.

To ensure that a structure will last throughout its service life, repairing reinforced concrete entails, among others, correctly marking off the area affected by aggressive agents that may deteriorate both the concrete and the steel. Chloride, the most damaging source of reinforcement corrosion, may diffuse to a greater or lesser distance from the surface depending on the ease of penetration. In this study, we calibrated a handheld X-ray fluorescence analyser (hXRF) and used it to quantify the chloride concentration in cement-based materials. The findings were verified against a series of samples of known concentration to establish a suitable correction factor. Chloride ions were quantified precisely and accurately with the hXRF instrument, and we calculated a correction factor of 1.16. The instrument and the information recorded were used to quantify the chloride ion content in different parts of an existing structure. The analyser identified apparently healthy areas that could, nonetheless, pose oxidation problems in the near future due to significant chloride concentration. Chloride quantification data at different depths can be used to draw diffusion or penetration profiles and to determine whether ion concentration around the reinforcement is within the recommended limits. The method developed can be applied in situ to quickly locate the most critical areas.

Musculoskeletal ultrasound: an effective tool to help medical students improve joint inflammation detection?

AIM: The objective of this study was to evaluate whether musculoskeletal (MS) ultrasound (US) can be useful in helping medical students to detect joint inflammation through physical examination. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study was performed by two groups of four 6th year medical students. None had received any previous training in the clinical examination of joints or the use of ultrasound. Students were put through a 5-session training programme on the clinical detection of either knee [group 1] or metacarpophalangeal (MCP) [group 2] inflammation. After an initial training session on physical examination of normal and inflamed joints, the students examined 170 joints from 41 patients attending the hospital outpatient clinic in 4 separate sessions. The same joints were assessed for synovitis with US with the ensuing data compared to that of the students and analyzed for concordance with Cohen's unweighted kappa. RESULTS: In total 60 knees [group 1] and 110 MCP [group 2] were evaluated. The agreement between the presence of arthritis detected by the students in the four sessions and the presence of synovitis detected by US improved from the session I to sessions III with a marked improvement in the last session. CONCLUSIONS: MSUS may be an effective technique for helping students to acquire the ability to detect joint inflammation.