ABSTRACT
No disponible
Subject(s)
Humans , Coronavirus Infections/prevention & control , Pneumonia, Viral/prevention & control , Pandemics , Checklist/standards , Patient Isolators/standardsABSTRACT
Objetivos: Comparar la autoextracción (AE) frente a la AE con collarines en sujetos con bajo riesgo de lesión cervical. Método: Estudio de simulación mediante análisis biomecánico con sensores inerciales, determinando la desalineación de la columna cervical durante la AE con y sin collarines cervicales. Resultados: El desequilibrio fue 3,12 (DE 34,62) grados mayor con el collarín STIFNECK (SN) (IC al 95% de -15,33 a 21,57; p =0,7234) que con AE y también 5,95 (DE 31,76) grados mayor con collarín X-COLLAR (XC) (IC al 95% de -10,98 a 22,87; p = 0,4654) que con AE. Cuando comparamos la AE con los diferentes tipos de collarines, observamos que con el collarín XC se produjeron 2,83 (DE 12,10) grados de desalineación más que con el collarín SN (IC al 95% de -3,62 a 9,27; p = 0,3650). Conclusiones: La desalineación de la columna cervical mediante la AE es similar a la provocada cuando se aplican collarines cervicales
Objective: To compare self-extraction with and without a cervical collar in subjects at low risk of cervical spine injuries. Methods: Simulation study analyzing biomechanical data from inertial sensors to detect misalignment of the cervical spine during self-extraction with and without a cervical collar. Results: Misalignment was a mean (SD) 3.12 (34.62) degrees greater during self-extraction with a Stiffneck collar in place (95% CI, -15.33 to 21.57 degrees; P=.7234) than during extraction without a collar. Misalignment was also greater, by 5.95 (31.76) degrees, with an X-collar in place (95% CI, -10.98 to 22.87; P=.4654) than without a collar. The between-collar comparison of differences showed that misalignment was 2.83 (12.10) degrees greater with the X-collar (95% CI, -3.62 to 9.27 degrees; P=.3650). Conclusion: Misalignment of the cervical spinal column is similar during self-extraction with or without a cervical collar in place
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Adult , Middle Aged , Accidents, Traffic , Cervical Vertebrae/injuries , Neck Injuries/prevention & control , Spinal Injuries/prevention & control , Restraint, Physical/instrumentation , Protective Devices , Biomechanical Phenomena , Healthy Volunteers , Neck Injuries/etiology , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Spinal Injuries/etiology , RiskABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: To compare self-extraction with and without a cervical collar in subjects at low risk of cervical spine injuries. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Simulation study analyzing biomechanical data from inertial sensors to detect misalignment of the cervical spine during self-extraction with and without a cervical collar. RESULTS: Misalignment was a mean (SD) 3.12 (34.62) degrees greater during self-extraction with a Stiffneck collar in place (95% CI, -15.33 to 21.57 degrees; P=.7234) than during extraction without a collar. Misalignment was also greater, by 5.95 (31.76) degrees, with an X-collar in place (95% CI, -10.98 to 22.87; P=.4654) than without a collar. The between-collar comparison of differences showed that misalignment was 2.83 (12.10) degrees greater with the X-collar (95% CI, -3.62 to 9.27 degrees; P=.3650). CONCLUSION: Misalignment of the cervical spinal column is similar during self-extraction with or without a cervical collar in place.
OBJETIVO: Comparar la autoextracción (AE) frente a la AE con collarines en sujetos con bajo riesgo de lesión cervical. METODO: Estudio de simulación mediante análisis biomecánico con sensores inerciales, determinando la desalineación de la columna cervical durante la AE con y sin collarines cervicales. RESULTADOS: El desequilibrio fue 3,12 (DE 34,62) grados mayor con el collarín STIFNECK (SN) (IC al 95% de 15,33 a 21,57; p =0,7234) que con AE y también 5,95 (DE 31,76) grados mayor con collarín X-COLLAR (XC) (IC al 95% de 10,98 a 22,87; p = 0,4654) que con AE. Cuando comparamos la AE con los diferentes tipos de collarines, observamos que con el collarín XC se produjeron 2,83 (DE 12,10) grados de desalineación más que con el collarín SN (IC al 95% de 3,62 a 9,27; p = 0,3650). CONCLUSIONES: La desalineación de la columna cervical mediante la AE es similar a la provocada cuando se aplican collarines cervicales.
Subject(s)
Accidents, Traffic , Cervical Vertebrae/injuries , Neck Injuries/prevention & control , Protective Devices , Restraint, Physical/instrumentation , Spinal Injuries/prevention & control , Adult , Biomechanical Phenomena , Female , Healthy Volunteers , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Neck Injuries/etiology , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Risk , Spinal Injuries/etiologyABSTRACT
No disponible
