Lapnurse-A Blended Learning Course for Nursing Education in Minimally Invasive Surgery: Design and Experts' Preliminary Validation of Its Online Theoretical Module.

BACKGROUND: The implantation of Minimally Invasive Surgery (MIS) leads to the specialization of nurses in this surgical field. However, there is no standard curriculum of MIS Nursing in Europe. Spanish and Portuguese nurses are inexperienced and have poor training in MIS. For that, a blended learning course for nursing education in MIS (Lapnurse) has been developed. This work aims to detail the course design and to preliminary validate by experts its online theoretical module. METHODS: Lapnurse consists of an online module with nine theoretical lessons and a face-to-face module with three practical lessons. The e-learning environment created to provide the online module, with didactic contents based on surgical videos and innovative 3D designs, has been validated by two technicians (functionality) and four nurses with teaching experience in MIS (usability and content). RESULTS: The E-learning platform meets all technical requirements, provides whole and updated multimedia contents correctly applied for educational purposes, incorporates interactivity with 3D designs, and has an attractive, easy-to-use and intuitive design. CONCLUSIONS: The lack of knowledge in MIS of Spanish and Portuguese nurses could be addressed by the blended learning course created, Lapnurse, where the e-learning environment that provides theoretical training has obtained a positive validation.

[Validity studies in laparoscopic simulation. Methodology and design considerations.] / Validación en simulación laparoscópica. Consideraciones metodológicas y de diseño.

OBJECTIVES: To describe a roadmap of the most representative milestones and considerations in the validation of surgical simulators, especially those of laparoscopic surgery. And additionally, help determine when in this process a simulator can be considered as validated. METHODS: A non-systematic review was carried out searching terms like simulation, validation, training, assessment, skills and learning curve, as well as providing the experience accumulated by our center. RESULTS: An ideal classical validation process should consist of the following steps: fidelity, verification/calibration/ reliability, subjective and objective strategies. Baseline tests of fidelity and verification/calibration/ technological reliability are not always detailed in the simulation literature. A simulator can be considered validated if, at least, satisfactorily completed any of the two main objective strategies, that is, constructive and/or criterion validity. CONCLUSIONS: The methodologies to validate simulators as useful and reliable for the improvement of psychomotor/ technical skills are widely analyzed, although there is a variety of approaches depending on the scientific reference consulted, not being implemented equally in all works. This apparent arbitrariness should be considered in advance because it can lead the researcher to misunderstandings, especially when the simulator will be regarded as valid.

OBJETIVOS: Describir una hoja de ruta de los hitos y consideraciones más representativos en la validación de simuladores quirúrgicos, especialmente los de cirugía laparoscópica. Y adicionalmente contribuir a determinar en qué momento de este proceso puede considerarse un simulador como validado.MÉTODOS: Se realizó una revisión no sistemática con los términos simulación, validación, formación, entrenamiento, evaluación, habilidades y curva de aprendizaje, además de aportar la experiencia acumulada por nuestro centro. RESULTADOS: Un proceso ideal clásico de validación debería constar de los siguientes pasos: Fidelidad, Verificación/ Calibración/Fiabilidad, estrategias subjetivas y objetivas. Las pruebas de inicio tanto de Fidelidad como de Verificación/Calibración/Fiabilidad tecnológica no siempre están descritas de manera explícita en los trabajos de validación de simuladores. Un simulador puede considerarse validado si al menos ha completado satisfactoriamente una validación de cualquiera de los dos grandes bloques de tipo objetivo, es decir, constructiva y/o de criterio. CONCLUSIONES: Los métodos que permiten validar simuladores como útiles y fiables para la mejora de habilidades de tipo psicomotor/técnico están ampliamente documentados aunque existe cierta variedad de enfoques en función de la referencia científica que se consulte, no aplicándose por igual en todos los trabajos. Esta aparente arbitrariedad debería ser conocida de antemano porque puede llevar al investigador a ciertos equívocos, especialmente a la hora de afirmar cuándo el simulador se considera plenamente validado.

Validación en simulación laparoscópica. Consideraciones metodológicas y de diseño / Validity studies in laparoscopic simulation. Methodology and design considerations

Objetivos: Describir una hoja de ruta de los hitos y consideraciones más representativos en la validación de simuladores quirúrgicos, especialmente los de cirugía laparoscópica. Y adicionalmente contribuir a determinar en qué momento de este proceso puede considerarse un simulador como validado. Métodos: Se realizó una revisión no sistemática con los términos simulación, validación, formación, entrenamiento, evaluación, habilidades y curva de aprendizaje, además de aportar la experiencia acumulada por nuestro centro. Resultados: Un proceso ideal clásico de validación debería constar de los siguientes pasos: Fidelidad, Verificación/ Calibración/Fiabilidad, estrategias subjetivas y objetivas. Las pruebas de inicio tanto de Fidelidad como de Verificación/Calibración/Fiabilidad tecnológica no siempre están descritas de manera explícita en los trabajos de validación de simuladores. Un simulador puede considerarse validado si al menos ha completado satisfactoriamente una validación de cualquiera de los dos grandes bloques de tipo objetivo, es decir, constructiva y/o de criterio. Conclusiones: Los métodos que permiten validar simuladores como útiles y fiables para la mejora de habilidades de tipo psicomotor/técnico están ampliamente documentados aunque existe cierta variedad de enfoques en función de la referencia científica que se consulte, no aplicándose por igual en todos los trabajos. Esta aparente arbitrariedad debería ser conocida de antemano porque puede llevar al investigador a ciertos equívocos, especialmente a la hora de afirmar cuándo el simulador se considera plenamente validado

Objectives: To describe a roadmap of the most representative milestones and considerations in the validation of surgical simulators, especially those of laparoscopic surgery. And additionally, help determine when in this process a simulator can be considered as validated. Methods: A non-systematic review was carried out searching terms like simulation, validation, training, assessment, skills and learning curve, as well as providing the experience accumulated by our center. Results: An ideal classical validation process should consist of the following steps: fidelity, verification/calibration/ reliability, subjective and objective strategies. Baseline tests of fidelity and verification/calibration/ technological reliability are not always detailed in the simulation literature. A simulator can be considered validated if, at least, satisfactorily completed any of the two main objective strategies, that is, constructive and/or criterion validity. Conclusions: The methodologies to validate simulators as useful and reliable for the improvement of psychomotor/ technical skills are widely analyzed, although there is a variety of approaches depending on the scientific reference consulted, not being implemented equally in all works. This apparent arbitrariness should be considered in advance because it can lead the researcher to misunderstandings, especially when the simulator will be regarded as valid

Formación en cirugía laparoscópica urológica básica y avanzada: evaluación de 30 años de experiencia de un programa de formación en España / Training in basic and advanced laparoscopy: Evaluation of a 30-year experience in a training program in Spain

La falta de unos estándares globalmente establecidos para el aprendizaje en laparoscopia urológica no ha impedido que las técnicas laparoscópicas se mantengan en continuo desarrollo y evolución. En la actualidad, la laparoscopia convive junto a la cirugía robótica, y en la última década han sido múltiples las técnicas que han sufrido un auge con el empleo de un abordaje laparoscópico (nefrectomía total y parcial, pieloplastia, colposacropexia, etc.). Pretendemos evaluar la incorporación progresiva de diferentes técnicas quirúrgicas en el programa de aprendizaje laparoscópico y, por otra parte, proyectamos analizar la evolución de los programas de formación en laparoscopia urológica para lograr introducir este tipo de técnicas en la actividad quirúrgica hospitalaria. Presentamos nuestra experiencia de 30 años en diferentes programas de formación en laparoscopia urológica, auspiciados por la Asociación Española de Urología (AEU), y que han sido sometidos a varios estudios de validez para determinar su capacidad para evaluar eficazmente las habilidades laparoscópicas básicas y avanzadas. Asimismo, destacaremos la tendencia actual y futura hacia modelos de capacitación basados en las competencias quirúrgicas donde es trascendental la formación individualizada, la acreditación y especialización de tutores y donde el incremento en la utilización de métodos de capacitación y evaluación basados en la simulación son cada vez más comunes (AU)

The lack of globally established standards for learning urological laparoscopy has not prevented laparoscopic techniques from evolution and continuous development. Laparoscopy coexists with robotic surgery today, and in the last decade there have been many techniques that have undergone a boom with the use of a laparoscopic approach (total and partial nephrectomy, pyeloplasty, colposacropexy, etc.). We intend to evaluate the progressive incorporation of different surgical techniques in the laparoscopic learning program and, on the other hand, to analyze the evolution of training programs in urological laparoscopy to bring this type of techniques within the hospital surgical activity.We describe our 30-years experience in different training programs in urological laparoscopy that have been sponsored by the Spanish Association of Urology (AEU), and have undergone several validity studies to assess their capacity in order to evaluate effectively basic and advanced laparoscopic skills.We will also highlight the current and future trend towards training models based on surgical competences where individualized training, accreditation and specialization of tutors is crucial, and where the increase in the use of training and evaluation methods based on the simulation are increasingly common (AU)

Evaluación de competencias en Urología. Esscolap® basic, como aproximación a la mejora de las capacidades de los urólogos / Evaluation of competencies in urology. Esscolap® basic, as aproximation to urologists skills improvement

Introducción: La Urología necesita de modelos de evaluación de capacidades, a pesar de que existe una variada oferta de herramientas que no están integradas en los programas de formación. Contexto: No existe un criterio universal para medir el nivel de competencia. Los programas de formación deben proporcionar conocimientos y destrezas, y deben considerar las habilidades cognitivas, la formación basada sobre simulación y modelo animal. La validez es un concepto complejo que hace referencia a la capacidad del instrumento de evaluación, por lo que es necesario establecer varios tipos de validación para asegurar la capacidad de un método, reforzarse con distintos test de fiabilidad y cálculo de consistencia interna entre evaluadores. Objetivo: A partir de un dossier estructurado de competencias quirúrgicas, clasificadas por grupos, se planteó el sistema ESSCOLAP® Basic con 5 ejercicios sobre simulador, para la evaluación de las competencias básicas en Laparoscopia. Una vez validado, en el CCMIJU, se planteó ampliar el alcance e implementación del mismo en otras localizaciones. Resultados: Nuestro sistema no ha demostrado aún su validez en el ámbito clínico real, porque no presenta una validez predictiva con datos clínicos de resultados en salud. Existe, además, un cierto rango de subjetividad, por lo que se requiere establecer criterios claros y definidos para cualquier situación. El número de evaluadores y de los ejercicios a evaluar, va a influir en los test de fiabilidad que miden el grado de acuerdo entre evaluadores, de modo que sólo obteniendo un elevado número de casos evaluados, podremos acercarnos a una mayor fiabilidad de nuestro sistema. Por último, asumimos que la incorporación de este tipo de herramientas implica un coste añadido a cargo de las instituciones públicas y privadas responsables, que sólo se considerará rentable cuando se demuestre su trazabilidad real y positiva en resultados sanitarios. Conclusiones: ESSCOLAP® Basic, con capacidad de implementación rápida y sencilla, ha sido validado y contrastado para la evaluación de las habilidades técnicas básicas en laparoscopia (AU)

Introduction: Urology needs models of competencies assessment, although there is a wide range of tools not yet integrated into the official training programs. Context: At present, there is no universal framework for measuring surgeons ́ level of competence. Urology training programs should provide and consider knowledge, pyschomotor/cognitive skills, and simulator, cadaver or animal models-based training. Validity is a complex concept that refers to the capacity of the evaluation tool, so it is necessary to demonstrate several types of validation to assure the capacity of a method, reinforced with different reliability tests and calculation of internal consistency between evaluators. Objective: Based on a structured dossier of surgical skills, classified by groups, the ESSCOLAP® Basic system was proposed with 5 simulator tasks to evaluate basic laparoscopic skills. Once validated in the JUMISC (Spain), the tool was proposed to extend its scope and implementation in other locations. Results: Our system has not yet demonstrated a full validity in the real clinical setting because a predictive validity needs to be demonstrated on the basis of clinical data. It also suffers from a certain range of subjectivity, thus implying clear and defined criteria for any situation. Factors like the number of evaluators and tasks to assess will influence the reliability tests that measure the degree of agreement between evaluators, so that a higher number of evaluated cases would imply a greater reliability of our system. Finally, we assume that the incorporation of this type of tools implies an added cost, charged to the public and private responsible institutions, which will only be considered cost-effective when it is demonstrated its real and positive traceability in health outcomes. Conclusions: ESSCOLAP® Basic, of quick and simple implementation capacity, has been validated and calibrated for the evaluation of basic technical skills in laparoscopy (AU)

[Evaluation of competencies in urology. Esscolap® basic, as aproximation to urologists skills improvement.] / Evaluación de competencias en Urología. Esscolap® basic, como aproximación a la mejora de las capacidades de los urólogos.

Urology needs models of competencies assessment, although there is a wide range of tools not yet integrated into the official training programs. CONTEXT: At present, there is no universal framework for measuring surgeons' level of competence. Urology training programs should provide and consider knowledge, pyschomotor/cognitive skills, and simulator, cadaver or animal models-based training. Validity is a complex concept that refers to the capacity of the evaluation tool, so it is necessary to demonstrate several types of validation to assure the capacity of a method, reinforced with different reliability tests and calculation of internal consistency between evaluators. OBJECTIVE: Based on a structured dossier of surgical skills, classified by groups, the ESSCOLAP® Basic system was proposed with 5 simulator tasks to evaluate basic laparoscopic skills. Once validated in the JUMISC (Spain), the tool was proposed to extend its scope and implementation in other locations. RESULTS: Our system has not yet demonstrated a full validity in the real clinical setting because a predictive validity needs to be demonstrated on the basis of clinical data. It also suffers from a certain range of subjectivity, thus implying clear and defined criteria for any situation. Factors like the number of evaluators and tasks to assess will influence the reliability tests that measure the degree of agreement between evaluators, so that a higher number of evaluated cases would imply a greater reliability of our system. Finally, we assume that the incorporation of this type of tools implies an added cost, charged to the public and private responsible institutions, which will only be considered cost-effective when it is demonstrated its real and positive traceability in health outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: ESSCOLAP® Basic, of quick and simple implementation capacity, has been validated and calibrated for the evaluation of basic technical skills in laparoscopy.

[Training in basic and advanced laparoscopy: Evaluation of a 30-year experience in a training program in Spain.] / Formación en cirugía laparoscópica urológica básica y avanzada: evaluación de 30 años de experiencia de un programa de formación en España.

The lack of globally established standards for learning urological laparoscopy has not prevented laparoscopic techniques from evolution and continuous development. Laparoscopy coexists with robotic surgery today, and in the last decade there have been many techniques that have undergone a boom with the use of a laparoscopic approach (total and partial nephrectomy, pyeloplasty, colposacropexy, etc.).We intend to evaluate the progressive incorporation of different surgical techniques in the laparoscopic learning program and, on the other hand, to analyze the evolution of training programs in urological laparoscopy to bring this type of techniques within the hospital surgical activity. We describe our 30-years experience in different training programs in urological laparoscopy that have been sponsored by the Spanish Association of Urology (AEU), and have undergone several validity studies to assess their capacity in order to evaluate effectively basic and advanced laparoscopic skills. We will also highlight the current and future trend towards training models based on surgical competences where individualized training, accreditation and specialization of tutors is crucial, and where the increase in the use of training and evaluation methods based on the simulation are increasingly common.

The reach of Spanish-language YouTube videos on physical examinations made by undergraduate medical students.

This study was conducted to evaluate the performance and reach of YouTube videos on physical examinations made by Spanish university students. We analyzed performance metrics for 4 videos on physical examinations in Spanish that were created by medical students at Miguel Hernández University (Elche, Spain) and are available on YouTube, on the following topics: the head and neck (7:30), the cardiovascular system (7:38), the respiratory system (13:54), and the abdomen (11:10). We used the Analytics application offered by the YouTube platform to analyze the reach of the videos from the upload date (February 17, 2015) to July 28, 2017 (2 years, 5 months, and 11 days). The total number of views, length of watch-time, and the mean view duration for the 4 videos were, respectively: 164,403 views (mean, 41,101 views; range, 12,389 to 94,573 views), 425,888 minutes (mean, 106,472 minutes; range, 37,889 to 172,840 minutes), and 2:56 minutes (range, 1:49 to 4:03 minutes). Mexico was the most frequent playback location, followed by Spain, Colombia, and Venezuela. Uruguay, Ecuador, Mexico, and Puerto Rico had the most views per 100,000 population. Spanish-language tutorials are an alternative tool for teaching physical examination skills to students whose first language is not English. The videos were especially popular in Uruguay, Ecuador, and Mexico.

[New technologies in minimally invasive surgery training: what do surgeons demand?]. / Nuevas tecnologías en formación de cirugía de mínima invasión: ¿qué demandan los cirujanos?

BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive surgery might greatly benefit from the Information and Communications Technologies. The objective of this work is to determine the better approach to include those technologies, in particular an e-Learning platform, into an in-person training course. METHODS: An online survey was sent to all participants in any of the laparoscopic training courses at Jesús Usón Minimally Invasive Surgery Centre. This survey included questions regarding new technologies used for training. Once all data were gathered, a descriptive analysis was performed. RESULTS: 382 questionnaires were sent of which 102 were correctly received back. This means a response rate equal to 30%. Current theoretical training means are watching surgical videos (85-83.3%) and assisting to in-person training courses (77-75.5%). Participants rated as useful the use of new technologies for training (4.1 ± 0.9) and they would mainly use it both before and after assisting to an in-person training course (80-78.4%). CONCLUSIONS: It is proposed a methodology that provides participants with didactic resources based on surgical videos, both before and after assisting to an in-person training course. Through the application of this methodology, an improvement and reduction of the time that surgeons expend in training is aimed.

Antecedentes: las tecnologías de la información y comunicación pueden aportar beneficios a la formación en cirugía de mínima invasión. Objetivo: determinar la manera más adecuada de incluir las tecnologías de la información y comunicación, en particular una plataforma de e-Learning, en un programa de formación presencial. Material y métodos: se realizó una encuesta en línea entre los asistentes al Centro de Cirugía de Mínima Invasión Jesús Usón, con preguntas relativas a las nuevas tecnologías aplicadas a la formación. Con los datos recopilados se efectuó un estudio descriptivo. Resultados: se enviaron 382 cuestionarios y se recibieron 102 (30%) correctamente respondidos. Los medios para formación teórica más empleados en la actualidad en la población estudiada son: visualización de videos quirúrgicos (85-83.3%) y la asistencia a cursos (77-75.5%). Los usuarios consideran útiles las nuevas tecnologías en formación (4.1 ± 0.9) y sobre todo usarían una plataforma de e-Learning personalizada antes y después de asistir a un curso de formación presencial (80-78.4%). Conclusiones: se propone una metodología de recursos didácticos basados en videos quirúrgicos antes y después que los alumnos asistan a un curso de formación presencial, para que mediante la aplicación de esta metodología se mejore y optimice el tiempo que los cirujanos dedican a su formación.

[Pyramid training model in laparoscopic surgery]. / Modelo de formación piramidal para la enseñanza de cirugía laparoscópica.

BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive surgery implementation requires a regulated and orderly learning process. METHODS: Jesús Usón Minimally Invasive Surgery Centre promotes a pyramid training model structured into four levels: training of basic and advanced skills in physical simulator (level 1), training of anatomical protocols and advanced skills with animal models (level 2) training advanced procedural skills with tele-surgical applications (level 3), and training in the operating room (level 4). Training provided at levels 1 and 2 is described and evaluated. RESULTS: 4284 participants have been trained in laparoscopy at our institution. 95.5% surgeons: 49% gastroenterologists, 30% urologists, and 14% gynecologist (14%). 77% of celebrated courses consisted of 20 hours training (8 at level 1 and 12 at level 2). 94.37% of participants considered pyramid model as highly suitable, scoring 9.5 on a scale 1-10 for the model and for the simulation quality. 82.7% perceived the improvement in their laparoscopic skills and 99.56% recommend this training program to other surgeons. DISCUSSION: There are no unified criteria between different training programs but most of them measure laparoscopic skills based on time of execution, quality or mistakes of the exercise, and the student satisfaction test. CONCLUSION: The pyramid training model lead to the acquisition of necessary laparoscopic skills to perform safely advanced minimally invasive techniques.

Antecedentes: la práctica de la cirugía de mínima invasión necesita que el aprendizaje sea estructurado y progresivo. Material y métodos: estudio prospectivo efectuado en el Centro de Cirugía de Mínima Invasión Jesús Usón que propone un modelo de formación piramidal con cuatro niveles: adquisición de habilidades básicas en simulador (nivel 1), desarrollo de técnicas quirúrgicas específicas en modelos animales (nivel 2), telemedicina y telementorización (nivel 3), y aplicación al paciente con supervisión experimentada (nivel 4). Objetivo: describir los niveles 1 y 2 que se practican en el Centro y evaluar la formación impartida. Resultados: 4,284 alumnos han recibido formación en cirugía laparoscópica: 95.5% médicos: cirujanos del aparato digestivo (49%), urólogos (30%) y ginecólogos (14%). En 77% de los cursos celebrados disponen de 20 horas de adiestramiento, 8 en el nivel 1, y 12 en el nivel 2. El 94.37% considera altamente apropiado el modelo de formación piramidal, calificándolo con 9.58 sobre 10 y con 9.5 a la calidad de la simulación. El 82.75% percibe que ha avanzado notablemente en sus destrezas y 99.56% recomendaría a otros cirujanos la realización de actividades en el Centro. Conclusión: el modelo de formación propuesto permite alcanzar las habilidades necesarias para efectuar correctamente procedimientos avanzados en cirugía de mínima invasión.