Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Phys Med ; 46: 75-80, 2018 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29519413

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To develop a transit-dose portal dosimetry method based on a commercial collapsed-cone algorithm. METHODS: A Varian Clinac21EX (Varian Medical Systems, USA), equipped with an amorphous-silicon EPID aS1000, was used. Dose calculations were performed with the collapsed-cone algorithm of Pinnacle3 v8.0 m (Philips Medical Systems, USA). A model for the energy of 6 MV was made in Pinnacle3 and afterwards validated for clinical use. A virtual phantom with different densities was contoured and superimposed on the patient images, simulating the presence of the EPID during the treatment. Corrections for photon spectral variations were introduced using Matlab (Mathworks, USA). Transit dosimetry was verified with an anthropomorphic phantom, on which different treatment fields were simulated in locations of skull, thorax and pelvis. In addition, a prostate treatment with IMRT was administered thereon. Dose distributions were compared with gamma index. RESULTS: The dose differences at the central point did not exceed 2%, except for the 20 x 20 cm2 field size centered in the skull. The model presented in this work, assumes that the dimensions of the solid water phantom, are infinite, except for the thickness. The mean values for the gamma index pass rates were 85.62% for (3%, 3 mm), 91.73% (4%, 3 mm) and 95.68% (5%, 3 mm). CONCLUSIONS: The value of 95% for γ (5%, 3 mm) can be established as the value below which the origin of the discrepancies should be investigated. It should be considered that the proposed method is complementary and not a substitute for pre-treatment dosimetry.


Subject(s)
Electrical Equipment and Supplies , Radiometry/instrumentation , Humans , Phantoms, Imaging
2.
Sci Total Environ ; 598: 657-668, 2017 Nov 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28454038

ABSTRACT

Electromagnetic radiowave exposure is a major concern in most countries due to possible adverse health effects. Over the last 10years, many technological changes (digital television, mobile technologies, wireless networks…) have led to variations in the electromagnetic field (EMF) levels. A large number of studies devoted to the analysis of EMF levels with personal dosimeters or computer models of the exposure of mobile stations have been conducted. However, the study of the exposure values, taking into account all the existing sources, and their evolution in a wide area, using measurements, has rarely been performed. In this paper, we provide a comparison of the EMF exposure levels for the city of Alcalá de Henares (Spain) over a ten-year period using a broadband isotropic probe in the range from 100kHz to 3GHz. A statistical and spatial analysis of the measurements and their variations are also presented for the study of the global and local variations. The measured values in the period from 2006 to 2015 were ranging from 0.02 to 2.05V/m. Our global results show a moderate increase from 2006 to 2010 and they are almost invariant from 2010 to 2015. Although the whole dataset does not have relevant statistical difference, we have found marked local differences. In the city areas where the population density has remained unaltered, we have measured lower exposure levels. Conversely, new urban and industrial developments have demanded new resources, which have potentially contributed to the observed increase in the measured electric field levels within these areas.


Subject(s)
Electromagnetic Fields , Environmental Exposure/analysis , Radio Waves , Cities , Humans , Spain
3.
Med Phys ; 44(1): 333-341, 2017 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28102946

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Amorphous silicon electronical portal imaging devices (EPIDs) are widely used for dosimetric measurements in Radiation Therapy. The purpose of this work was to determine if a portal dose prediction method can be utilized for dose map calculations based on the linear accelerator model within a commercial treatment planning system (Pinnacle3 v8.0 m). METHODS: The method was developed for a 6 MV photon beam on the Varian Clinac 21-EX, at a nominal dose rate of 400 MU/min. The Varian aS1000 EPID was unmounted from the linear accelerator and scanned to acquire CT images of the EPID. The CT images were imported into Pinnacle3 and were used as a quality assurance phantom to calculate dose on the EPID setup at a source to detector distance of 105 cm. The best match of the dose distributions was obtained considering the image plane located at 106 cm from the source to detector plane. The EPID was calibrated according to the manufacturer procedure and corrections were made for output factors. Arm-backscattering effect, based on profile correction curves, has been introduced. Five low-modulated and three high-modulated clinical planned treatments were predicted and measured with the method presented here and with MatriXX (IBA Dosimetry, Schwarzenbruck, Germany). RESULTS: A portal dose prediction method based on Pinnacle3 was developed without modifying the commissioned parameters of the model in use in the clinic. CT images of the EPID were acquired and used as a quality assurance phantom. The CT images indicated a mean density of 1.16 g/cm3 for the sensitive area of the EPID. Output factor measured with the EPID were lower for small fields and larger for larger fields (beyond 10 × 10 cm2 ). Arm-backscatter correction showed a better agreement at the target side of the EPID. Analysis of Gamma index comparison (3%, 3 mm) indicated a minimum of 97.4% pass rate for low modulated and 98.3% for high modulated treatments. Pass rates were similar for MatriXX measurements. CONCLUSIONS: The method developed here can be easily implemented into clinic, as neither additional modeling of the clinical energy nor an independent image prediction algorithm are necessary. The main advantage of this method is that portal dose prediction is calculated with the same algorithm and beam model used for patient dose distribution calculation. This method was independently validated with an ionization chamber matrix.


Subject(s)
Algorithms , Electrical Equipment and Supplies , Particle Accelerators , Radiometry/instrumentation , Calibration , Humans , Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted , Tomography, X-Ray Computed
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...