Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
Add more filters










Publication year range
1.
Nefrología (Madrid) ; 44(1): 61-68, ene.- feb. 2024. tab, graf
Article in Spanish | IBECS | ID: ibc-229422

ABSTRACT

El hiperaldosteronismo primario (HAP) es una causa importante de hipertensión arterial (HTA) secundaria. El estudio del mismo precisa de una alta sospecha clínica, además de un estudio hormonal que confirme la hipersecreción hormonal. Es importante iniciar el tratamiento adecuado una vez se confirma el diagnóstico, y para ello es preciso demostrar si la hipersecreción hormonal es unilateral (pacientes que podrían ser tributarios a tratamiento quirúrgico) o bilateral (pacientes que son tributarios a tratamiento únicamente farmacológico). En el Hospital del Mar desde el año 2016 existe un equipo de trabajo multidisciplinar en el que participan nefrólogos, endocrinólogos, radiólogos y cirujanos para evaluar los casos con sospecha de hiperaldosteronismo y consensuar el mejor abordaje diagnóstico-terapéutico de estos pacientes, incluyendo la necesidad de cateterismo venoso adrenal, que es una técnica que en los últimos años se ha erigido como gold standard para el estudio del HAP. En el presente estudio recogemos la experiencia de nuestro centro en la realización de cateterismo venoso adrenal y en la utilidad de este para el manejo de tales pacientes (AU)


Primary hyperaldosteronism (PAH) is an important cause of secondary hypertension (HTN). The study of the same requires a high clinical suspicion in addition to a hormonal study that confirms hormonal hypersecretion. It is important to start the appropriate treatment once the diagnosis is confirmed, and for this is necessary to demonstrate whether the hormonal hypersecretion is unilateral (patients who could be candidates for surgical treatment) or bilateral (patients who are candidates for pharmacological treatment only). At the Hospital del Mar since 2016 there has been a multidisciplinary work team in which Nephrologists, Endocrinologists, Radiologists and Surgeons participate to evaluate cases with suspected hyperaldosteronism and agree on the best diagnostic-therapeutic approach for these patients, including the need for adrenal vein sampling, which is a technique that in recent years has become the gold standard for the study of PAH. In the present study we collect the experience of our center in performing adrenal vein catheterization and its usefulness for the management of these patients (AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Adult , Middle Aged , Aged , Hyperaldosteronism/therapy , Catheterization/methods , Treatment Outcome
2.
Nefrologia (Engl Ed) ; 44(1): 61-68, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37150672

ABSTRACT

Primary hyperaldosteronism (PAH) is an important cause of secondary hypertension (HTN). The study of the same requires a high clinical suspicion in addition to a hormonal study that confirms hormonal hypersecretion. It is important to start the appropriate treatment once the diagnosis is confirmed, and for this is necessary to demonstrate whether the hormonal hypersecretion is unilateral (patients who could be candidates for surgical treatment) or bilateral (patients who are candidates for pharmacological treatment only). At the Hospital del Mar since 2016 there has been a multidisciplinary work team in which Nephrologists, Endocrinologists, Radiologists and Surgeons participate to evaluate cases with suspected hyperaldosteronism and agree on the best diagnostic-therapeutic approach for these patients, including the need for adrenal vein sampling, which is a technique that in recent years has become the gold standard for the study of PAH. In the present study we collect the experience of our centre in performing AVC and its usefulness for the management of these patients.


Subject(s)
Hyperaldosteronism , Hypertension , Humans , Adrenal Glands/blood supply , Hyperaldosteronism/complications , Hyperaldosteronism/diagnosis , Hypertension/complications
3.
J Am Coll Surg ; 237(4): 596-604, 2023 10 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37326320

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: To assess the 5-year outcomes of patients undergoing Collis-Nissen gastroplasty for type III-IV hiatal hernia with short esophagus. STUDY DESIGN: From a prospective observational cohort of patients who underwent antireflux surgery for type III-IV hiatal hernia between 2009 and 2020, those with short esophagus (abdominal length <2.5 cm) in whom a Collis-Nissen procedure was performed and reached at least 5 years of follow-up were identified. Hernia recurrence, patients' symptoms, and quality of life were assessed annually by barium meal x-ray, upper endoscopy, and validated symptoms and Quality of Life in Reflux and Dyspepsia (QOLRAD) questionnaires. RESULTS: Of the 114 patients with Collis-Nissen gastroplasty, 80 patients who completed a 5-year follow-up were included (mean age 71 years). There were no postoperative leaks or deaths. Recurrent hiatal hernia (any size) was identified in 7 patients (8.8%). Heartburn, regurgitation, chest pain, and cough were significantly improved at each follow-up interval (p < 0.05). Preoperative dysphagia disappeared or improved in 26 of 30 patients, while new-onset dysphagia occurred in 6. Mean postoperative QOLRAD scores significantly improved at all dimensions (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Collis gastroplasty combined with Nissen fundoplication provides low hernia recurrence, good control of symptoms, and improved quality of life in patients with large hiatal hernia and short esophagus.


Subject(s)
Deglutition Disorders , Gastroesophageal Reflux , Gastroplasty , Hernia, Hiatal , Laparoscopy , Humans , Aged , Hernia, Hiatal/surgery , Hernia, Hiatal/etiology , Gastroesophageal Reflux/diagnosis , Gastroplasty/adverse effects , Deglutition Disorders/etiology , Quality of Life , Treatment Outcome , Laparoscopy/methods , Fundoplication/methods , Hernia
4.
Int J Surg ; 51: 164-169, 2018 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29409791

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To assess the minimally invasive surgery into the step-up approach procedures as a standard treatment for severe acute pancreatitis and comparing its results with those obtained by classical management. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study comparative with two groups treated over two consecutive, equal periods of time were defined: group A, classic management with open necrosectomy from January 2006 to June 2010; and group B, management with the step-up approach with minimally invasive surgery from July 2010 to December 2014. RESULTS: In group A, 83 patients with severe acute pancreatitis were treated, of whom 19 underwent at least one laparotomy, and in 5 any minimally invasive surgery. In group B, 81 patients were treated: minimally invasive surgery was necessary in 17 cases and laparotomy in 3. Among operated patients, the time from admission to first interventional procedures was significantly longer in group B (9 days vs. 18.5 days; p = 0.042). There were no significant differences in Intensive Care Unit stay or overall stay: 9.5 and 27 days (group A) vs. 8.5 and 21 days (group B). Mortality in operated patients and mortality overall were 50% and 18.1% in group A vs 0% and 6.2% in group B (p < 0.001 and p = 0.030). CONCLUSIONS: The combination of the step-up approach and minimally invasive surgery algorithm is feasible and could be considered as the standard of treatment for severe acute pancreatitis. The mortality rate deliberately descends when it is used.


Subject(s)
Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures/methods , Pancreatitis/surgery , Acute Disease , Humans , Laparotomy/methods , Length of Stay , Pancreatitis/mortality , Retrospective Studies
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...