[Circulating tumor cells: a new challenge for laboratory medicine]. / Les cellules tumorales circulantes : un nouveau challenge pour la biologie clinique oncologique.

Circulating tumor cells (CTCs) can be detected in the blood of patients with nearly all types of locally and metastatic adenocarcinomas. CTCs are epithelial cells whose release from a primitive tumor or a metastatic localization may be mediated by an epithelial-mesenchymal transition. Their pro-metastatic potential is still under debate because their phenotypes may be very heterogeneous, even within the same patient (expression of stem-cells markers, apoptotic status...). They often exhibit discrepancies with the primitive tumor, especially concerning the molecular basis of sensitivity/resistance to targeted therapies (expression of HER2 and hormone receptors, mutations responsible for resistance to tyrosine-kinase inhibitors). Many methods for CTCs analysis are commercially available but very few are evaluated and standardized enough for clinical applications. The CellSearch device is the only one which is validated by the FDA for managing metastatic breast, prostate and colo-rectal cancer. It was used in most of the studies having demonstrated the prognostic and predictive value of CTCs in many tumoral localizations. Other studies are wanted to assess the ability of CTCs to optimize the therapeutic choices, to monitor drug efficiency in real-time as well as to become a surrogate end-point for evaluation of new therapies. Beyond CTCs enumeration, their biological features will need to be investigated.

Urinary cystatin C can improve the renal safety follow-up of tenofovir-treated patients.

A receiver operating curve analysis was performed to assess the predictive value of the urinary cystatin C to urinary creatinine ratio for the renal monitoring of tenofovir. Urinary cystatin C to urinary creatinine ratio was measured in 37 samples from patients referred for suspected tenofovir-induced Fanconi syndrome. The best threshold (14 microg/mmol) was associated with sensitivity, 90.9%; specificity, 88.5%; positive predictive value, 76.9%; and negative predictive value, 95.8%. Urinary cystatin C to urinary creatinine ratio allows to rule out a Fanconi syndrome in most cases; thus, it should be used for the safety follow-up of nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitor-treated patients.

Population pharmacokinetics and pharmacogenetics of imatinib in children and adults.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to explore the effect of several demographic, biological, and pharmacogenetic covariates on the disposition of imatinib and its main metabolite (CGP74588) in both adults and children. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Thirty-three children with solid malignancies included in a phase II exploratory study and 34 adults with gastrointestinal stromal tumors received 340 mg/m(2) and 400 mg imatinib, respectively. Plasma imatinib and CGP74588 concentrations observed on day 1 and at steady-state were analyzed by a population pharmacokinetic method (NONMEM) to evaluate the effect of age, body weight, age, sex, albuminemia, plasma alpha1-acid glycoprotein (AGP), and eight polymorphisms corresponding to ABCB1, ABCG2, CYP3A4, CYP3A5, and AGP (pharmacogenetic data available for 46 of 67 patients). RESULTS: Analysis of the whole data set in 67 patients showed that apparent clearance (CL/F) of imatinib was positively correlated with body weight and albuminemia and negatively with AGP. By considering these three covariates, the interindividual variability on CL/F decreased from 47% to 19%. The apparent clearance of CGP74588 was similarly dependent on both body weight and AGP and significantly lower (30% reduction) at steady-state. By adding genotype status to the final covariate imatinib model, a 22% reduction in CL/F was observed in heterozygous compared with wild-type patients corresponding to ABCG2 c.421C>A (P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: By considering morphologic and biological covariates, a unique covariate model could be used to accurately describe imatinib pharmacokinetics in patients ages 2 to 84 years. Morphologic and biological characteristics have a stronger influence than pharmacogenetics on imatinib pharmacokinetics.

Cystatin C: current position and future prospects.

Cystatin C is a low-molecular-weight protein which has been proposed as a marker of renal function that could replace creatinine. Indeed, the concentration of cystatin C is mainly determined by glomerular filtration and is particularly of interest in clinical settings where the relationship between creatinine production and muscle mass impairs the clinical performance of creatinine. Since the last decade, numerous studies have evaluated its potential use in measuring renal function in various populations. More recently, other potential developments for its clinical use have emerged. This review summarises current knowledge about the physiology of cystatin C and about its use as a renal marker, either alone or in equations developed to estimate the glomerular filtration rate. This paper also reviews recent data about the other applications of cystatin C, particularly in cardiology, oncology and clinical pharmacology.

Modeling the variability of creatinine measurements improves estimates of the glomerular filtration rate.

BACKGROUND: The precision of the formulae used to estimate glomerular filtration rate (GFR) decreases when the serum creatinine (SCr) assay is biased compared with the assay used during the development of the formulae. METHODS: For 100 children referred for 51Cr-EDTA clearance (CLEDTA), SCr was measured with a JAFFE (classic Jaffe colorimetric creatinine assay), a compensated Jaffe (COMP), an enzymatic (ENZ) and an HPLC assay. A population pharmacokinetics approach based on a non-linear mixed effects model (NONMEM) was used to model the relationships between the CLEDTA and physiopathological/analytical variables. RESULTS: Unlike JAFFE values, COMP and ENZ SCr gave a high bias using the Schwartz formula for the GFR calculation (median +27.0% and +39.1%, respectively). The best equation obtained from the analysis of the curves of [51Cr-EDTA]plasma vs. time was (n=67): CLEDTA (mL/min)=61.9 x [SCr (microM)/Theta]Psi x [age (years)/13.4]0.522 x (weight (kg)/44.2)0.233. The SCr assay-related coefficients and exponents were Theta=97.4, Psi=-0.757 (-0.922; -0.592) for JAFFE; Theta=85.3, Psi=-0.579 (-0.681; -0.477) for COMP; and Theta=82.6, Psi=-0.560 (-0.659; -0.460) for ENZ. When applied to 33 children, this equation estimated CL(EDTA) without any significant bias: +3.1% (-11.8; +11.4) for COMP and +5.3% (-7.2; +16.4) for ENZ. CONCLUSIONS: As long as there is no standardization of SCr measurements, population pharmacokinetics may be a powerful tool to model inter-assay variability.

[Interest of cystatin C for individual dosing of anticancer drugs cleared by the kidneys]. / Intérêt de la cystatine C pour l'adaptation de posologie des médicaments anticancéreux à élimination rénale.

Cystatin C is a protein freely filtered in the renal glomerulus, then reabsorbed and completely metabolised within the tubular cells. The possibility to predict the clearance of compounds eliminated by the kidneys (and then to control their interindividual variability) was evaluated for two cytotoxic drugs (carboplatin and topotecan) in adults and EDTA (ethylene diamine tetraacetic acid), a compound used to determine the glomerular filtration rate in children. The population pharmacokinetic approach based on NONMEM program was used. For each of the three compounds, the cystatin C serum level was better predictive of clearance than that of creatinine. Moreover, for carboplatin and EDTA, the best equation between clearance and patients' characteristics included both cystatin C and creatinine level. A generalisation of cystatin C assay would contribute to standardise the clinical practices in Oncology.

Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic relationships of imatinib and its main metabolite in patients with advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumors.

PURPOSE: This study explored factors affecting the pharmacokinetic variability of imatinib and CGP 74588, and the pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic correlations in patients with advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumors. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Thirty-five patients with advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumors received 400 mg of imatinib daily. Six blood samples were drawn: before intake, during 1- to 3- and 6- to 9-hour intervals after intake on day 1, and before intake on days 2, 30, and 60. Plasma imatinib and CGP 74588 concentrations were quantified by reverse-phase high-performance liquid chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry, and analyzed by the population pharmacokinetic method (NONMEM program). The influence of 17 covariates on imatinib clearance (CL) and CGP 74588 clearance (CLM/fm) was studied. These covariates included clinical and biological variables and occasion (OCC = 0 for pharmacokinetic data corresponding to the first administration, or OCC = 1 for the day 30 or 60 administrations). RESULTS: The best regression formulas were: CL (L/h) = 7.97 (AAG/1.15)(-0.52), and CLM/fm (L/h) = 58.6 (AAG/1.15)(-0.60) x 0.55(OCC), with the plasma alpha1-acid glycoprotein (AAG) levels indicating that both clearance values decreased at a higher AAG level. A significant time-dependent decrease in CLM/fm was evidenced with a mean (+SD) CGP 74588/imatinib area under the curve (AUC) ratio of 0.25 (+/-0.07) at steady state, compared with 0.14 (+/-0.03) on day 1. Hematologic toxicity was correlated with pharmacokinetic variables: the correlation observed with the estimated unbound imatinib AUC at steady-state (r = 0.56, P < 0.001) was larger than that of the total imatinib AUC (r = 0.32, NS). CONCLUSIONS: The plasma AAG levels influenced imatinib pharmacokinetics. A protein-binding phenomenon needs to be considered when exploring the correlations between pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics.

GFR is better estimated by considering both serum cystatin C and creatinine levels.

Serum cystatin C (cysC) is a potential marker of the glomerular filtration rate (GFR) that has generated conflicting reports in children. A prospective study was conducted to assess the benefit of considering cysC together with serum creatinine (SCr) and demographic and morphologic characteristics to better estimate the 51Cr-ethylenediaminetetraacetate (EDTA) clearance (CL), i.e., the GFR. Plasma 51Cr-EDTA data from 100 children or young adults (range: 1.4-22.8 years old) were analyzed according to the population pharmacokinetic approach by using the nonlinear mixed effects model (NONMEM) program. The actual CL was compared to the CL predicted according to different covariate equations. The best covariate equation (+/-95% confidence interval) was: GFR (ml/min)=63.2(+/-3.4) . [(SCr (microM)/96)(-0.35 (+/-0.20))] . [(cysC (mg/l)/1.2)(-0.56 (+/-0.19))] . [(body weight (kg)/45)(0.30 (+/-0.17))] . [age (years)/14)(0.40 (+/-0.16))]. This equation was associated with a less biased and more precise estimation than the Schwartz equation. CysC improves the estimation of the GFR in children if considered with other covariates within the mathematical formula.

Contribution of the MDRD equation and of cystatin C for renal function estimates in cancer patients.

BACKGROUND: Serum creatinine (SCr) and Cockcroft-Gault creatinine clearance (CG CrCL) are used to estimate glomerular filtration rate (GFR). Other markers have been proposed including serum cystatin C (cysC) and the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) study equation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We have compared the diagnostic performances of SCr, cysC, CG CrCL, and the MDRD equation in 144 cancer patients. For reference we used either the measured or the predicted carboplatin clearance, which is around the GFR + 25 mL/min. RESULTS: CysC was more sensitive than SCr (70.1% vs 13.4%) but was not very specific (61% for a cut-off = 0.95 mL). CysC values were higher in 40 cancer patients vs 40 healthy controls with a similar and normal mean CG CrCL (1.08 vs 0.71 mg/L; p < 0.001). CG and the MDRD equations gave similar values for Pearson's coefficient, ROC-plot AUC, and precision, except for patients with poor general status, where the MDRD equation was better (MAPE: 12.4% vs 19.6%, p < 0.001; R: 0.908 vs 0.813). CONCLUSIONS: In cancer patients, cysC is a more sensitive indicator of the glomerular filtration rate than SCr, but its diagnostic performance is lower than for CG CrCL. There may be no advantage in replacing the CG equation by the MDRD equation except for patients with severe malnutrition and/or inflammation.

Cystatin C as a new covariate to predict renal elimination of drugs: application to carboplatin.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The individual dosing of drugs that are mainly eliminated unchanged in the urine is made possible by assessing renal function. Most of the methods used are based on serum creatinine (SCr) levels. Cystatin C (CysC) has been proposed as an alternative endogenous marker of the glomerular filtration rate (GFR). Carboplatin is one of the drugs for which elimination is most dependent on the GFR. A prospective clinical trial including 45 patients was conducted to assess the value of serum CysC as a predictor of carboplatin clearance (CL). METHODS: The patients were receiving carboplatin as part of established protocols. Carboplatin was administered as a daily 60-minute infusion at doses ranging from 290 to 1700mg. A population pharmacokinetic analysis was performed using the nonlinear mixed effect modelling NONMEM program according to a two-compartment pharmacokinetic model. RESULTS: Data from 30 patients were used to test the relationships between carboplatin CL and morphological, biological and demographic covariates previously proposed for prediction of the GFR. The interindividual variability of carboplatin CL decreased from 31% (no covariate) to 14% by taking into account five covariates (SCr, CysC, bodyweight [BW], age and sex). Prospective evaluation of these relationships using the data from the other 15 patients confirmed that the best equation to predict carboplatin CL was based on these five covariates, with a mean absolute percentage error of 13% as an assessment of precision. NONMEM analysis of the whole dataset (n = 45 patients) was performed. The best covariate equation corresponding to the overall analysis was: CL (mL/min) = 110 x (SCr/75)-0.512 x (CysC/1.0)-0.327 x (BW/65)0.474 x (age/56)-0.387 x 0.854sex, with SCr in micromol/L, CysC in mg/L, BW in kilograms, age in years and sex = 0 if male and 1 if female. To put the value of CysC as an endogenous marker of the GFR into perspective, covariate equations without SCr were also evaluated; a better prediction was obtained by considering CysC together with age and BW (interindividual variability of 16.6% vs 23.3% for CysC alone). CONCLUSION: CysC is a marker of drug elimination that is at least as good as SCr for predicting carboplatin CL. The model based on five covariates was superior to those based on only four covariates (with BW, age and sex combined with either SCr or CysC), indicating that CysC and SCr are not completely redundant to each other. Further pharmacokinetic evaluation is needed to determine whether SCr or CysC is the better marker of renal elimination of other drugs.

Impact of standardized calibration on the inter-assay variation of 14 automated assays for the measurement of creatinine in human serum.

PURPOSE: The aim of our study was to measure the inter-assay variation and accuracy of serum creatinine assays and to assess the effect of standardized calibration procedures on this variability. METHODS: We analyzed 30 human sera and three reference materials, using 17 creatinine assays (12 colorimetric, 4 enzymatic and 1 HPLC). We compared two standardized calibration procedures, using either a reference material or secondary standards, to that recommended by the manufacturers. RESULTS: For assays calibrated according to the manufacturers' recommendations, the median inter-assay coefficient of variation (CV) was 14.2% for 20 low samples (45-150 microM), and 7.7% for 10 high samples (250-350 microM). The CV was significantly influenced by the calibration procedure, but none of the standardized calibration procedures significantly improved the inter-assay variability. However, a significant decrease in CV was noted within each type of assay method (colorimetric or enzymatic) when the standardized calibration used standards of level(s) close to the concentrations to be measured. Only the compensated Jaffe technique and the amido-hydrolase assay showed bias of less than 10%. CONCLUSIONS: Standardizing calibration procedures is unlikely to decrease the analytical variability of creatinine assays enough to allow uniform and reliable use of the equations for estimation of glomerular filtration rate.

Serum cystatin C is a better marker of topotecan clearance than serum creatinine.

PURPOSE: To evaluate plasma cystatin level as a covariate to predict topotecan pharmacokinetics. Cystatin C, a member of the cystatin superfamily of cysteine proteinase inhibitors, has been recently proposed as an alternative endogenous marker of glomerular filtration. Renal function is known as a key factor of topotecan clearance. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Data were obtained from 59 patients who underwent drug monitoring for individual dosing of topotecan. Topotecan plasma concentrations versus time were analyzed using a nonlinear mixed effect model according to a two-compartment pharmacokinetic model and a first-order conditional estimation method. A proportional error model was used for residual and interpatient variabilities. Data-splitting was done randomly to create a model-building data set (44 patients) and a model validation data set (15 patients). RESULTS: Using the building data set, four covariates significantly decreased the objective function value and interindividual variability on topotecan clearance (CL) when tested individually: ideal body weight (IBW), serum creatinine, age, and cystatin C level. The best model was: CL (L/hour) = 20.2 [cystatin C (mg/L) / 1.06](-0.60) [IBW (kg) / 57](0.95). Prospective evaluation using the validation data set confirmed that the model based on cystatin C had a better predictive value than the models based on serum creatinine or body surface area. CONCLUSION: Cystatin C is a marker of drug elimination which is superior to serum creatinine for topotecan. It deserves to be further explored as a promising covariate for drug dosing as well as selection criteria for clinical studies of drugs eliminated mainly or partially by the kidney.

A recombinant cell bioassay for measurement of overall estrogenic activity of serum: preliminary results in women with breast cancer.

The estrogenic status of patients with breast cancer may influence the prognosis and the response to treatment and is currently assessed by immunological measurement of serum estradiol. This does not account for estrogenic or anti-estrogenic activity related to growth factors able to activate the estrogen receptor, to anti-estrogenic drugs or to exogenous supply of estrogen-like compounds. We developed a recombinant bioassay based on a mammary cell line expressing luciferase in an estrogen receptor-dependent way. In a human serum matrix the MELN system was able to detect the transcriptional activity of estradiol, growth factors (epidermal growth factor (EGF), insulin at insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1)-like concentrations), xeno-estrogens (diethylstilbestrol, phytoestrogens) and tamoxifen in a dose-dependent manner. The intra- and inter-assay variations were < 6% and < or = 15%, respectively, whatever the estradiol concentration; the functional sensitivity was < 10 pmol/l equivalents of estradiol. We assessed the overall estrogenic activity of serum (OEAS) in 16 healthy women and in 24 women with advanced breast cancer. The correlation between OEAS and serum log10 17-beta-estradiol (E2) was good for healthy women (r2=0.8568) but poor for patients (r2=0.0563). Assessment of the OEAS/E2 ratio as a prognostic and predictive factor would be of interest in clinical prospective trials involving ER+ breast cancer patients.

Epoetin alfa and intravenous iron sucrose to treat severe anemia in a patient with chronic radiation enteropathy: a case report.

We report the case of a patient with a severe chronic radiation enteropathy. She had been dependent on red cell transfusions for many years. On admission, she displayed anemia (8.6 g/dL) resulting from both inadequate EPO production and a functional iron deficiency. A 3-wk IV iron sucrose treatment (200 mg once weekly) resulted in an increased reticulocyte count, but did not raise the hemoglobin (Hb) level. The adjunction of epoetin alpha (10,000 IU three times a week) made it possible to reach the normal range (12.9 g/dL) after a 17-wk treatment. As the anti-anemic treatment discontinued, the Hb level decreased to 11.1 g/dL within 2 wk. Giving EPO again (10,000 IU twice a week) failed to maintain the Hb level, which dropped under basal values (7.8 g/dL). In contrast, a second combination EPO/iron sucrose did restore a normal Hb level and maintained it. This case report supports the combination of EPO and IV iron supplementation in patients with anemia of chronic disease and either an impaired iron absorption or intolerance to oral iron.