Does Convergent Placement of Interlocking Iliosacral Screws into the Body of Vertebra S1 Prevent Screw Migration?

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY To compare the outcomes of parallel and convergent iliosacral screw insertion into the body of vertebra S1 in the treatment of posterior pelvic arch injuries. MATERIAL AND METHODS Radiographs of 120 patients (43 women, 77 men), aged between 14-79 years, treated with iliosacral screw fixation for posterior pelvic ring fractures between 1.1.2009 and 31.12.2019 were reviewed for inclusion in the study. In each case two screws were inserted into the body of vertebra S1. The screws were inserted in either parallel or convergent orientation. Convergent orientation allows the threads of both screws to be interconnected. In this technique, the first screw is inserted into the centre of the body of vertebra S1 as a compression screw. The second screw is inserted as a positioning screw and is placed so that the threads of both screws lock together. We believe that the interlocking of the threads of both screws and contact of the second screw with three cortices (two of the iliac bone and one of the sacrum) increase the stability of the fixation. Migration of loosened screws was measured on radiographs of the pelvis obtained at six weeks and at three, six and twelve months postoperatively. Migration of five millimetres or more within the first six weeks was considered to be clinically significant. Only patients after primary fracture treatment and with a complete one-year follow-up were included in the study. Cases of non-union and failure of osteosynthesis of the anterior pelvic arch and patients with incomplete follow-up were excluded. The incidence of significant screw migration between the two techniques was compared using Fisher's exact test with a 5% level of significance. RESULTS Sixty-three patients (23 women, 40 men) aged 17 to 79 years were included in the study. Parallel screws were used in 24 patients (8 women, 16 men) and convergent screws were used in 39 patients (15 women, 24 men). Clinically significant migration occurred in nine (38%) patients after parallel insertions. In two of these cases there was unstable fixation of the anterior pelvic arch. Migration of convergently placed iliosacral screws occurred in four (10%) cases. In three of these cases this was due to unstable fixation of the anterior pelvic arch. The difference in screw migration between the two groups was shown to be significant (p = 0.0219). DISCUSSION Iliosacral screws ensure sufficient stability of the posterior arch in type B and C pelvic fractures provided that the anterior pelvic arch is stable. Convergent insertion of iliosacral screws may increase the stability of fixation. Minimally invasive surgery with sufficient stability may be advantageous for early treatment of patients after multiple trauma and in elderly patients. The weaknesses of this study are its relatively small number of patients, which prevented reliable statistical analysis of screw migration according to the type of pelvic fractures. The second main limitation is the failure to perform densitometric examination of the skeleton in patients with X-ray proven screw migration for confirmation of osteoporosis as one of the possible causes of fixation failure. CONCLUSIONS The results of the study suggest that convergent insertion of iliosacral screws into S1 is associated with a lower risk of screw migration and subsequent failure of fixation of the posterior pelvic arch. Key words: pelvic fracture, pelvic injury, iliosacral screw, parallel screws, convergent screws, migration of iliosacral screws.

Heterotopic Ossifications after Fractures of the Anterior Pelvic Segment: Overview of Morphology and Clinical Correlations.

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY In certain patients after treated pelvic fractures, heterotopic ossifications can be observed in the area of the pubic bone, which protrude ventrally, and often also laterally and distally into surrounding soft tissues of the groin or even medially into the proximal thigh. These ossifications are shaped like sharp spikes of various lengths, which is why the authors refer to them as "spicules". In some patients, these ossifications are also associated with pain. The aim of this study was to provide an overview of the morphology of heterotopic ossifications of the anterior segment of the pelvis and to discuss the etiology of their origin, and further to determine the incidence, risk factors and clinical significance of these "spike-like" ossifications. MATERIAL AND METHODS X-ray images of patients treated for pelvic injuries between 2009 and 2018, in whom radiological documentation was available at least 12 months after the injury or surgery were evaluated. Patients with acetabular fractures or combined pelvic and acetabular injuries were not included in the study. Possible risk factors studied included gender, severity of injury, type of fracture according to the AO / ASIF classification, concomitant bladder injury, method of treatment and type of osteosynthesis of the anterior segment of the pelvis. The categorial data concerning risk factors for the observed "spicule" type ossifications was statistically evaluated using the chi-square test at the 5% level of significance. RESULTS The studied group consisted of 218 patients (121 women, 97 men) aged 13 to 92 years of age (mean age was 54 years, median age was 55 years). Heterotopic "spicule" type ossifications occurred in 21 patients (4 females, 17 males) aged 18 to 76 years (mean 39 years, median 41 years). Significant risk factors in the observed ossification group included male sex (p = 0.0004), severity of trauma (predominance of "spicules" was seen in multiple trauma patients, (p = 0.0024), unstable pelvic injury according to AO / ASIF classification (predominance of "spicules" in type B and C fractures over type A fractures, (p = 0.0013), concomitant bladder injury (p = 0.0009) and in patients undergoing surgical treatment of the fracture (p < 0.0001), where all the observed spicules were seen in patients undergoing anterior pelvic segment osteosynthesis. A statistically significant difference was also evident when comparing the osteosynthetic material used in the anterior segment (a increased incidence of ossifications was seen in patients undergoing plate fixation compared to patients in whom pubic screws were used, p = 0.0050). DISCUSSION Heterotopic ossifications are described as relatively common consequences of pelvic fractures, but are not considered a major problem because they usually do not produce any clinical correlations. The causes of post-traumatic and postoperative ossifications in the pelvic area include the effects of high energy traumas, extensive surgical procedures, prolonged artificial lung ventilation, and post-infectious states after complications of surgical treatment. CONCLUSIONS The study identified risk factors for heterotopic "spicule" type ossifications. The identified risk factors include male sex, severity of injury, unstable type of fracture, concomitant bladder injury, surgical treatment, and the use of massive implants. Only the effect of bladder injuries can be partially influenced by performing less invasive surgical techniques during combined pelvic and bladder injuries. Key words: pelvic fracture, pelvic injury, complications, heterotopic ossifications, multiple trauma, unstable pelvic trauma, urinary bladder injury.