ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: As the choice of treatment in patients with cervical carcinoma depends on cancer stage at diagnosis, accurate staging is essential. PURPOSE: To compare three different combinations of magnetic resonance (MR) sequences for preoperative staging. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Fifty-seven consecutive patients with biopsy proven cervical carcinoma underwent MR imaging (MRI) staging followed by primary surgical treatment. Thirty-two of 57 patients had had a cone biopsy prior to MRI. Three MR pulse sequence combinations were retrospectively reviewed by two experienced radiologists. The first imaging protocol consisted of pre-contrast sagittal and transverse images (protocol A), the second protocol included additionally oblique high-resolution T2-weighted (T2W) MR images of the cervix (protocol A+B), and the third included also contrast-enhanced sequences (protocol A+B+C). The imaging findings in the three steps (A, A+B, A+B+C) were recorded. The TNM stage was used for comparison between preoperative imaging and histopathology. Histopathology, together with surgical findings, served as gold standard. RESULTS: In 4/57 (7%) patients, the MR assessment of tumor stage (mrT) was altered when oblique sequences were added to the standard two plane imaging protocol (A+B). The mrT stage was altered in 1/57 (2%) patient when contrast-enhanced sequences were added to standard and oblique sequences (protocol A+B+C). The correlation between visible tumor on MRI and presence of tumor in the resected specimen did not change by adding oblique or contrast-enhanced images. CONCLUSION: It is not necessary to perform oblique and contrast-enhanced sequences in small cervical carcinomas, i.e. without parametrial invasion. To avoid erroneous interpretation, information on previous cone biopsy is essential.
ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: To describe and analyze results from the fine-needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) technique, used as a diagnostic tool, in patients with orbital lesions. DESIGN: Retrospective case series. METHODS: setting: Institutional (Karolinska Hospital, Stockholm). STUDY POPULATION: 207 patients with 210 orbital lesions. INTERVENTION: 225 FNABs of the orbit. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Successful diagnosis from FNAB. RESULTS: Of the 210 orbital lesions evaluated with FNAB, a successful cytologic diagnosis was achieved in 176 (84%). In more than half of the orbital lesions (54%), the FNAB diagnosis in addition to imaging appearance, clinical appearance, and clinical history provided sufficient information for treatment, and the patient did not require an incisional or excisional biopsy. Ninety-seven patients underwent additional excisional or incisional biopsy; FNAB diagnoses and the histopathologic diagnoses corresponded in 87% of the cases with an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.84 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.76-0.90). The difference was statistically significant between the ability to make a successful cytologic FNAB diagnosis in palpable lesions vs nonpalpable lesions (successful diagnosis in 90% [CI = 85%-95%] vs 75% [CI = 66%-84%]; P < .01). Neither the orbital quadrant location, nor the radiologic appearance (diffuse vs encapsulated), nor size of the lesion affected the success of FNAB diagnoses (all P > .7). There was a complication in 6 cases (3%). All complications were temporary and none led to permanent damage. CONCLUSIONS: FNAB proved effective and exceedingly safe. With the current healthcare climate of minimally invasive surgery and cost control, FNAB should be considered as a valid alternative to open surgery in the evaluation and management of orbital lesions.
