Unloading, ablation, bridging and transplant: different indications and treatments using the Impella 5.5 as longer-term circulatory support in one patient-an interdisciplinary case report.

Background: In patients with cardiogenic shock the clinical treatment often involves temporary mechanical circulatory support for initial haemodynamic stabilization to enable further assessment of therapeutic strategies. The surgically implanted Impella 5.5 can be used for several indications like ventricular unloading, haemodynamic support during high-risk interventions, and as a bridge-to-transplant strategy.We present an interdisciplinary managed case of using Impella 5.5 for multiple indications and treatment strategies in one patient. Case summary: A 66-year-old patient with known dilated cardiomyopathy was admitted with non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction and underwent urgent coronary bypass grafting. His native heart function did not recover and he experienced recurrent episodes of sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT) and electrical storm. He was evaluated for heart transplantation (OHT) and received a VT-ablation. However, he suffered an in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA) with subsequent implantation of an extracorporeal life support system (ECLS). After surgical placement of an Impella 5.5 due to left ventricular distension and pulmonary congestion, the ECLS was successfully weaned. He showed good neurological outcomes and underwent another high-risk VT-ablation. The patient was further stabilized under Impella 5.5 support in a bridge-to-transplant strategy. After 34 days he underwent a successful OHT. Discussion: In this interdisciplinary case report the surgically implanted Impella 5.5 as temporary mechanical circulatory support was used for multiple different indications and treatment strategies like ventricular unloading, haemodynamic support during high-risk interventions, and as bridge-to-transplant strategy in one patient.

Temperature control in adults after cardiac arrest: a survey of current clinical practice in Germany.

BACKGROUND: Temperature control is recommended after out of hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) by international guidelines. This survey aimed to investigate current clinical practice and areas of uncertainty. METHODS: Online survey targeting members of three medical emergency and critical care societies in Germany (April 21-June 6, 2022) assessing post-cardiac arrest temperature control management. RESULTS: Of 341 completed questionnaires 28% (n = 97) used temperature control with normothermic target and 72% (n = 244) temperature control with hypothermic target. The definition of fever regarding patients with cardiac arrest ranged from ≥ 37.7 to 39.0 °C. Temperature control was mainly started in the ICU (80%, n = 273) and most commonly core cooling (74%, n = 254) and surface cooling (39%, n = 134) with feedback were used. Temperature control was maintained for 24 h in 18% (n = 61), 48 h in 28% (n = 94), 72 h in 42% (n = 143) and longer than 72 h in 13% (n = 43). 7% (n = 24) were using different protocols for OHCA with initial shockable and non-shockable rhythm. Additional 14% (n = 48) were using different temperature control protocols after in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA) compared with OHCA. Overall, 37% (n = 127) changed practice after the publication of the ERC-2021 guidelines and 33% (n = 114) after the recent publication of the revised ERC-ESICM guideline on temperature control. CONCLUSIONS: One-third of the respondents changed clinical practice since recent guideline update. However, a majority of physicians further trusts in temperature control with a hypothermic target. Of interest, 14% used different temperature control strategies after IHCA compared with OHCA and 7% for shockable and non-shockable initial rhythm. A more individualized approach in post resuscitation care may be warranted.

Clinical characteristics, causes and predictors of outcomes in patients with in-hospital cardiac arrest: results from the SURVIVE-ARREST study.

INTRODUCTION: In-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA) is acutely life-threatening and remains associated with high mortality and morbidity. Identifying predictors of mortality after IHCA would help to guide acute therapy. METHODS: We determined patient characteristics and independent predictors of 30-day in-hospital mortality, neurological outcome, and discharge/referral pathways in patients experiencing IHCA in a large tertiary care hospital between January 2014 and April 2017. Multivariable Cox regression model was fitted to assess predictors of outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 368 patients with IHCA were analysed (median age 73 years (interquartile range 65-78), 123 (33.4%) women). Most patients (45.9%) had an initial non-shockable rhythm and shockable rhythms were found in 20.9%; 23.6% of patients suffered from a recurrent episode of cardiac arrest. 172/368 patients died within 30 days (46.7%). Of 196/368 patients discharged alive after IHCA, the majority (72.9%, n = 143) had a good functional neurological outcome (modified Rankin Scale ≤ 3 points). In the multivariable analysis, return of spontaneous circulation without mechanical circulatory support (hazard ratio (HR) 0.36, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.21-0.64), invasive coronary angiography and/or percutaneous intervention (HR 0.56, 95% CI 0.34-0.92), and antibiotic therapy (HR 0.87, 95% CI 0.83-0.92) were associated with a lower risk of 30-day in hospital mortality. CONCLUSION: In the present study, IHCA was survived in ~ 50% in a tertiary care hospital, although only a minority of patients presented with shockable rhythms. The majority of IHCA survivors (~ 70%) had a good neurological outcome. Recovery of spontaneous circulation and presence of treatable acute causes of the arrest are associated with better survival. Clinical Characteristics, Causes and Predictors of Outcomes in Patients with In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: Results from the SURVIVE-ARREST Study. ABBREVIATIONS: CPR, cardiopulmonary resuscitation; IHCA, In-hospital cardiac arrest; MCS, mechanical circulatory support; PCI, percutaneous coronary intervention; ROSC, return of spontaneous circulation; SBP, systolic blood pressure.

Temperature Control After In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

BACKGROUND: This study was conducted to determine the effect of hypothermic temperature control after in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA) on mortality and functional outcome as compared with normothermia. METHODS: An investigator initiated, open-label, blinded-outcome-assessor, multicenter, randomized controlled trial comparing hypothermic temperature control (32-34°C) for 24 h with normothermia after IHCA in 11 hospitals in Germany. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality after 180 days. Secondary end points included in-hospital mortality and favorable functional outcome using the Cerebral Performance Category scale after 180 days. A Cerebral Performance Category score of 1 or 2 was defined as a favorable functional outcome. RESULTS: A total of 1055 patients were screened for eligibility and 249 patients were randomized: 126 were assigned to hypothermic temperature control and 123 to normothermia. The mean age of the cohort was 72.6±10.4 years, 64% (152 of 236) were male, 73% (166 of 227) of cardiac arrests were witnessed, 25% (57 of 231) had an initial shockable rhythm, and time to return of spontaneous circulation was 16.4±10.5 minutes. Target temperature was reached within 4.2±2.8 hours after randomization in the hypothermic group and temperature was controlled for 48 hours at 37.0°±0.9°C in the normothermia group. Mortality by day 180 was 72.5% (87 of 120) in hypothermic temperature control arm, compared with 71.2% (84 of 118) in the normothermia group (relative risk, 1.03 [95% CI, 0.79-1.40]; P=0.822). In-hospital mortality was 62.5% (75 of 120) in the hypothermic temperature control as compared with 57.6% (68 of 118) in the normothermia group (relative risk, 1.11 [95% CI, 0.86-1.46, P=0.443). Favorable functional outcome (Cerebral Performance Category 1 or 2) by day 180 was 22.5% (27 of 120) in the hypothermic temperature control, compared with 23.7% (28 of 118) in the normothermia group (relative risk, 1.04 [95% CI, 0.78-1.44]; P=0.822). The study was prematurely terminated because of futility. CONCLUSIONS: Hypothermic temperature control as compared with normothermia did not improve survival nor functional outcome at day 180 in patients presenting with coma after IHCA. The HACA in-hospital trial (Hypothermia After Cardiac Arrest in-hospital) was underpowered and may have failed to detect clinically important differences between hypothermic temperature control and normothermia. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www. CLINICALTRIALS: gov; Unique Identifier: NCT00457431.

Single-dose of adrecizumab versus placebo in acute cardiogenic shock (ACCOST-HH): an investigator-initiated, randomised, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, multicentre trial.

BACKGROUND: Cardiogenic shock has a high mortality on optimal therapy. Adrenomedullin is released during cardiogenic shock and is involved in its pathophysiological processes. This study assessed treatment with the humanised, monoclonal, non-neutralising, adrenomedullin antibody adrecizumab, increasing circulating concentrations of adrenomedullin in cardiogenic shock. METHODS: In this investigator-initiated, placebo-controlled, double-blind, multicentre, randomised trial (ACCOST-HH), patients were recruited from four university hospitals in Germany. Patients were eligible if they were 18 years old or older and hospitalised for cardiogenic shock within the last 48 h. Exclusion criteria were resuscitation for longer than 60 min and cardiogenic shock due to sustained ventricular tachycardia or bradycardia. Adult patients in cardiogenic shock were randomly assigned (1:1) to intravenous adrecizumab (8 mg/kg bodyweight) or placebo using an internet-based software. A block randomisation procedure was applied with stratification by age (older vs younger than 65 years), sex (male vs female), and type of underlying cardiogenic shock (acute myocardial infarction vs other entities). Investigators, patients, and medical staff involved in patient care were masked to group assignment. The primary endpoint was number of days up to day 30 without the need for cardiovascular organ support, defined as vasopressor therapy, inotropes, or mechanical circulatory support (or both) assessed in the intention-to-treat population. Safety outcomes included therapy-emergent serious adverse events, severe adverse events, adverse events, suspected unexpected serious adverse reactions, study drug-related mortality, and total mortality. The trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03989531, and EudraCT, 2018-002824-17, and is now complete. FINDINGS: Between April 5, 2019, and Jan 13, 2021, 150 patients were enrolled: 77 (51%) were randomly assigned to adrecizumab and 73 (49%) to placebo. All patients received the allocated treatment. The number of days without the need for cardiovascular organ support was not different between patients receiving adrecizumab or placebo (12·37 days [95% CI 9·80-14·94] vs 14·05 [11·41-16·69]; adjusted mean difference -1·69 days [-5·37 to 2·00]; p=0·37). Serious adverse events occurred in 59 patients receiving adrecizumab and in 57 receiving placebo (odds ratio 0·92 [95% CI 0·43-1·98]; p=0·83). Mortality was not different between groups at 30 days (hazard ratio 0·99 [95% CI 0·60-1·65]; p=0·98) or 90 days (1·10 [0·68-1·77]; p=0·71). INTERPRETATION: Adrecizumab was well tolerated in patients with cardiogenic shock but did not reduce the need for cardiovascular organ support or improve survival at days 30 and 90. FUNDING: Adrenomed AG and University Hospital of Hamburg.

Cardiac perforation due to delayed migration of a chronic dialysis catheter: a case report.

BACKGROUND: Tunnelled haemodialysis catheters are commonly used to perform haemodialysis. Rare complications of these catheters include perforations of major blood vessels or the heart. Albeit rare, these complications can lead to significant morbidity and mortality. CASE SUMMARY: We present a case of late migration of a tunnelled haemodialysis catheter causing a right atrial perforation with subsequent pericardial tamponade, haemodynamic shock, and cardiac arrest. A 51-year-old female patient with end-stage renal disease presented with hypotension and lactate acidosis, indicating circulatory shock, during ambulatory intermittent haemodialysis. Dialysis was performed through a tunnelled haemodialysis catheter that had been implanted more than 1 year ago. Upon admission to the hospital, initial diagnostics, including transthoracic echocardiography and computed tomography scan, showed a circumferential pericardial effusion which was not haemodynamically significant and no other pathological findings. After being transferred to the intensive care unit, the patient again showed signs of haemodynamic shock at the start of another dialysis session which deteriorated to cardiac arrest. Ultimately, using multi-modality imaging, migration of the catheter tip through the right atrial wall into the pericardial space was diagnosed. Emergency sternotomy and surgical extraction of the tunnelled haemodialysis catheter were performed and the patient recovered completely. DISCUSSION: Migration and perforation of a tunnelled haemodialysis catheter can occur late after implantation and lead to circulatory shock, thus requiring immediate diagnostic workup and surgical therapy. Routine diagnostic procedures may be insufficient for making a correct diagnosis. More specific approaches, such as multi-modality imaging including contrast echocardiography, should be implemented upon clinical suspicion.

[Organ donation: A treatment option in end-of life intensive care?] / Die Organspende als Option in der intensivmedizinischen Behandlung am Lebensende.

A newly issued policy statement of the German Medical Association considers organ donation as an integral part of end-of-life intensive care in patients with devastating brain afflictions. Hence, patients' wishes towards organ donation and medical suitability should be evaluated when prognosis is considered futile and goals of treatment need to be reconsidered. Continuation of intensive care treatment towards the (mandatory) diagnosis of "brain death" and subsequently towards organ donation has to be legitimatized by patients' explicit wishes (organ donor card, advanced directive) or by surrogate decisions makers. Intensive care facilitating organ donation should be goal-directed and follow established guidelines. Thus, a potential recovery of transplantable organs is supported by appropriate intensive care treatment. Decisions to employ extended intensive care options (like extracorporeal circulatory support or cardiopulmonary resuscitation) in potential organ donors should be carefully outbalanced with patients' wishes, organ donation being considered an achievable goal and even potential frictions in medical teams.

Characteristics and Risk Factors for Intensive Care Unit Cardiac Arrest in Critically Ill Patients with COVID-19-A Retrospective Study.

The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) causing the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) led to an ongoing pandemic with a surge of critically ill patients. Very little is known about the occurrence and characteristic of cardiac arrest in critically ill patients with COVID-19 treated at the intensive care unit (ICU). The aim was to investigate the incidence and outcome of intensive care unit cardiac arrest (ICU-CA) in critically ill patients with COVID-19. This was a retrospective analysis of prospectively recorded data of all consecutive adult patients with COVID-19 admitted (27 February 2020-14 January 2021) at the University Medical Centre Hamburg-Eppendorf (Germany). Of 183 critically ill patients with COVID-19, 18% (n = 33) had ICU-CA. The median age of the study population was 63 (55-73) years and 66% (n = 120) were male. Demographic characteristics and comorbidities did not differ significantly between patients with and without ICU-CA. Simplified Acute Physiological Score II (SAPS II) (ICU-CA: median 44 points vs. no ICU-CA: 39 points) and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score (median 12 points vs. 7 points) on admission were significantly higher in patients with ICU-CA. Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) was present in 91% (n = 30) with and in 63% (n = 94) without ICU-CA (p = 0.002). Mechanical ventilation was more common in patients with ICU-CA (97% vs. 67%). The median stay in ICU before CA was 6 (1-17) days. A total of 33% (n = 11) of ICU-CAs occurred during the first 24 h of ICU stay. The initial rhythm was non-shockable (pulseless electrical activity (PEA)/asystole) in 91% (n = 30); 94% (n = 31) had sustained return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC). The median time to ROSC was 3 (1-5) minutes. Patients with ICU-CA had significantly higher ICU mortality (61% vs. 37%). Multivariable logistic regression showed that the presence of ARDS (odds ratio (OR) 4.268, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.211-15.036; p = 0.024) and high SAPS II (OR 1.031, 95% CI 0.997-1.065; p = 0.077) were independently associated with the occurrence of ICU-CA. A total of 18% of critically ill patients with COVID-19 suffered from a cardiac arrest within the intensive care unit. The occurrence of ICU-CA was associated with presence of ARDS and severity of illness.

Temporal trends in incidence, causes, use of mechanical circulatory support and mortality in cardiogenic shock.

AIM: The management of cardiogenic shock remains a clinical challenge even in well-developed healthcare systems, best illustrated by its high mortality despite numerous innovative proposals for management. The aim of this study was to describe temporal trends in incidence, causes, use of mechanical circulatory support, and mortality in cardiogenic shock in Germany. METHODS AND RESULTS: Data on all cardiogenic shock patients treated in German hospitals between 2005 and 2017 were obtained from the Federal Bureau of Statistics. The data set comprised 441 696 patients with cardiogenic shock, mean age 71 (±13.8) years, 171 383 (39%) female patients. Incidence rates increased from 33.1/100 000 population in 2005 (27 246 cases) to 51.7/100 000 population in 2017 (42 779 cases). Acute myocardial infarction was the most common cause of cardiogenic shock in 2005-07 (43 422 of 82 037 cases, 52.9%), but the proportion of cases caused by it decreased until 2014-17 (73 274 of 165 873 cases, 44.2%). Over time, intra-aortic balloon pump (2005: 5104; 2017: 973 cases) was used less frequently, whereas use of extracorporeal-membrane-oxygenation (2007: 35; 2017: 2414 cases) and percutaneous left ventricular assist devices (2005: 27; 2017: 1323 cases) increased. Mortality remained high at around 60% without relevant temporal trends in patients without acute myocardial infarction and slightly decreased in patients with acute myocardial infarction. CONCLUSIONS: In this large, nation-wide study, annual incidence of cardiogenic shock was growing, its causes were changing, and mortality was high despite a shift towards use of novel mechanical circulatory support devices. This highlights the need to address the evidence gap in this field, in particular for cardiogenic shock caused by diseases other than acute myocardial infarction.

Effects of COVID-19 on in-hospital cardiac arrest: incidence, causes, and outcome - a retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2), an emerging virus, has caused a global pandemic. Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), caused by SARS-CoV-2, has led to high hospitalization rates worldwide. Little is known about the occurrence of in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA) and high mortality rates have been proposed. The aim of this study was to investigate the incidence, characteristics and outcome of IHCA during the pandemic in comparison to an earlier period. METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis of data prospectively recorded during 3-month-periods 2019 and 2020 at the University Medical Centre Hamburg-Eppendorf (Germany). All consecutive adult patients with IHCA were included. Clinical parameters, neurological outcomes and organ failure/support were assessed. RESULTS: During the study period hospital admissions declined from 18,262 (2019) to 13,994 (2020) (- 23%). The IHCA incidence increased from 4.6 (2019: 84 IHCA cases) to 6.6 (2020: 93 IHCA cases)/1000 hospital admissions. Median stay before IHCA was 4 (1-9) days. Demographic characteristics were comparable in both periods. IHCA location shifted towards the ICU (56% vs 37%, p < 0.01); shockable rhythm (VT/VF) (18% vs 29%, p = 0.05) and defibrillation were more frequent in the pandemic period (20% vs 35%, p < 0.05). Resuscitation times, rates of ROSC and post-CA characteristics were comparable in both periods. The severity of illness (SAPS II/SOFA), frequency of mechanical ventilation and frequency of vasopressor therapy after IHCA were higher during the 2020 period. Overall, 43 patients (12 with & 31 without COVID-19), presented with respiratory failure at the time of IHCA. The Horowitz index and resuscitation time were significantly lower in patients with COVID-19 (each p < 0.01). Favourable outcomes were observed in 42 and 10% of patients with and without COVID-19-related respiratory failure, respectively. CONCLUSION: Hospital admissions declined during the pandemic, but a higher incidence of IHCA was observed. IHCA in patients with COVID-19 was a common finding. Compared to patients with non-COVID-19-related respiratory failure, the outcome was improved.

Massive pulmonary embolism with intra-hospital cardiac arrest and full recovery of right ventricular function after veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation therapy: a case report.

BACKGROUND: Massive pulmonary embolism (PE) with shock constitutes a life-threatening disease, challenging physicians with the need for fast decision-making in an emergency situation. While thrombolytic treatment or thrombectomy are considered the treatment of choice in high-risk PE, these strategies might not be able to unload the right ventricle (RV) fast enough in some patients with severe cardiogenic shock. CASE SUMMARY: We present a case of a patient with massive bilateral central PE who presented in cardiogenic shock, rapidly deteriorating to cardiac arrest. After successful re-establishing spontaneous circulation, the patient remained highly unstable, necessitating a treatment strategy ensuring a quick stabilization of the circulation. Therefore, we decided to use veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (vaECMO) as a supportive strategy allowing for autolysis of the lung to dissolve the thrombi (bridge to recovery). We were able to wean the patient from vaECMO support within 4 days and documented a complete recovery of right ventricular in echocardiography before hospital discharge. DISCUSSION: The concept of vaECMO treatment alone might be a valuable alternative in selected patients with massive PE and cardiogenic shock, in whom thrombolytic therapy might not unload the RV fast enough.

Epidemiology of intensive care unit cardiac arrest: Characteristics, comorbidities, and post-cardiac arrest organ failure - A prospective observational study.

BACKGROUND: Critically ill patients in intensive care units can frequently suffer from cardiac arrest (ICU-CA), the incidence of ICU-CA is associated with high mortality. Most studies on ICU-CA focused on risk factors and intra-arrest determinants. However, there is a lack of data on organ failure after ICU-CA and its clinical implications for outcome. This study aimed to investigate ICU-CA incidence, outcome and the occurrence of organ failure after ICU-CA. METHODS: We conducted a prospective observational study over a 1-year at 12 intensive care units of a tertiary care university hospital. We included all consecutive adult patients suffering cardiac arrest (CA) during the ICU stay. Incidence, clinical and neurological outcome, as well as organ failure and support were assessed. RESULTS: Out of 7690 patients, 176 (2%) with ICU-CA were identified during the study period. Male patients comprised 63% and the median age was 70 (58-78) years. The median ICU stay before ICU-CA was 3 (1-8) days. The initial cardiac rhythm was shockable (VT/VF) in 23% of patients; defibrillation during CPR was performed in 19%. The presumed cause of CA was cardiac in 24%, and sustained ROSC was observed in 80% of patients. Before CA 57% (n = 100) of patients were sedated, 63% (n = 110) mechanically ventilated, 70% needed vasopressor therapy and renal replacement therapy was necessary in 27% (n = 48) of patients. Organ failure after ICU-CA was common, 70% suffered from post-CA cardiac failure, renal replacement therapy was newly initiated in 26% of patients and liver failure occurred in 24% of patients. Mortality at ICU-discharge and at hospital discharge was 66 % and 68 %, respectively. Multivariate regression analysis identified the SOFA score [HR 1.09, 95% CI (0.92-3.18); p < 0.05] and liver failure [HR 2.44, 95% CI (1.39-4.26); p < 0.001] after ICU-CA as independent predictors of mortality. CONCLUSION: The incidence of ICU-CA is rare in critically ill patients. Organ failure before and after ICU-CA is common; liver failure incidence and severity of illness after ICU-CA are independent predictors of mortality and should be considered in further decisions on ICU therapy.

Switching to Impella 5.0 decreases need for transfusion in patients undergoing temporary mechanical circulatory support.

PURPOSE: Various options of temporary mechanical circulatory support (tMCS) exist for the treatment of cardiogenic shock, however, all forms of tMCS carry a risk of complications. The aim of this study was to compare bleeding complications and thromboembolic events under extracorporeal life support + Impella 2.5/CP (ECMELLA) and isolated Impella 5.0 therapy in the same patient cohort. MATERIAL: We retrospectively analyzed data of patients who underwent ECMELLA implantation and subsequent Impella 5.0 therapy. Implantation strategy and anticoagulation protocol were comparable in both groups. RESULTS: We included 15 patients (mean age 57.2 years; 80% of male patients) who were weaned from ECMELLA undergoing subsequent Impella 5.0 implantation. Mean duration of ECMELLA and Impella 5.0 therapy (10.5 vs. 11.2 days) did not differ significantly (p = .731). The average number of transfused packed red blood cells (PRBC) and thrombocyte concentrates (TC) was significantly decreased during Impella 5.0 treatment (PRBC: 30.3 vs 12.3, p = .001; TC: 5.9 vs 2.2, p = .045). Additionally, the transfusion rates per day were significantly reduced under Impella 5.0 support. CONCLUSIONS: The need for transfusions is significantly lower in the phase of Impella 5.0 therapy compared to the initial phase on ECMELLA. Therefore, we recommend replacing ECMELLA by an Impella 5.0 device early, if possible.

Impella 5.0 therapy as a bridge-to-decision option for patients on extracorporeal life support with unclear neurological outcomes.

OBJECTIVES: Peripheral venoarterial extracorporeal life support (ECLS) for the treatment of cardiogenic shock has shown to improve survival but is associated with complications. However, if the patient cannot be weaned from ECLS, their therapy options are limited. Although durable left ventricular assist device implantation might be an option in such cases, an unclear neurological outcome is often a contraindication. We hypothesize that Impella 5.0 therapy provides sufficient circulatory support while avoiding ECLS-related complications, thereby allowing for an adequate evaluation of a patient's neurological state and facilitating further treatment options. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed data from 22 ECLS patients (mean age 56.5 ± 10.7 years) with an unclear neurological status who underwent Impella 5.0 implantation between January 2016 and July 2018 in our institution. Neurological status was evaluated on a daily basis using the cerebral performance category score and the modified Rankin scale. RESULTS: Sixteen patients (72.7%) were resuscitated before ECLS implantation and 13 patients (59.1%) had acute myocardial infarction. The mean duration on ECLS before Impella 5.0 implantation was 9.3 ± 1.7 days. All patients were successfully weaned from ECLS by Impella 5.0 implantation via the axillary artery. The mean duration on Impella 5.0 was 16.3 ± 4.7 days. In surviving patients, both quantitative measurements of cerebral performance improved after 30 days compared to the baseline (P < 0.01). Six patients (27.3%) were bridged to a durable left ventricular assist device. In 9 patients (40.9%), myocardial function recovered during Impella 5.0 support and the device was successfully explanted. The 30-day survival rate was 68.2%. CONCLUSIONS: Impella 5.0 support provides a bridge-to-decision option for patients following ECLS implantation and leads to left ventricular unloading. It allows further evaluation of a patient's neurological situation and facilitates further therapy. About two-thirds of patients survived with acceptable neurological outcomes.

Neuron-specific-enolase as a predictor of the neurologic outcome after cardiopulmonary resuscitation in patients on ECMO.

BACKGROUND: Neuron-specific-enolase (NSE) is frequently used to predict the neurologic outcome in persistently unconscious patients after cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). However, its predictive value is unclear in the setting of veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation therapy (ECMO). Aim of this project is to evaluate the predictive value of NSE in ECMO patients. METHODS: NSE was measured after 24, 48, and 72 h in post-CPR ECMO patients. Neurologic status was evaluated using the best Cerebral Performance Categories Score (CPC) during the hospital stay. Patients who deceased within the first 24 h and patients who were awake during the first 24 h were excluded. ROC curves were calculated to assess the discriminative ability of single NSE measurements. Trajectories of serial NSE values were investigated using latent class mixed models. RESULTS: The derivation cohort consisted of 65 patients, 30-day all-cause mortality was 47.7% and a poor neurological outcome with a CPC score of 4-5 was seen 30.7%. NSE measurement after 48 h showed the best discrimination for poor neurological outcome (AUC of 0.87 in the ROC curve; cut-off value of 70 µg/L). Specificity was highest if using serial NSE measurements at all three time points. These results could be validated in an external cohort of 64 patients. CONCLUSION: In post-CPR patients on ECMO, NSE can be used to assess the neurologic outcome. Importantly, specificity was highest if using serial NSE measurements. Further research using prospective datasets is needed to verify these findings.

Unloading of the Left Ventricle During Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Therapy in Cardiogenic Shock.

OBJECTIVES: This report relates the authors' ongoing experience with percutaneous left ventricular (LV) unloading by using a transaortic LV assist device in combination with venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) and provides an in-depth analysis of the hemodynamic benefit of this approach. BACKGROUND: VA-ECMO is increasingly used in cases of severe cardiogenic shock. However, increase in afterload with subsequent LV overload is a major drawback of VA-ECMO. METHODS: Consecutive patients were treated with a transaortic LV assist device in addition to VA-ECMO for cardiogenic shock. The primary endpoint was 30-day all-cause mortality. Additional endpoints included weaning from VA-ECMO and safety endpoints. RESULTS: Between September 2013 and January 2018, 106 patients were treated with percutaneous LV unloading, using a transaortic LV assist device in combination with VA-ECMO. Successful weaning from VA-ECMO support was achieved in 51.9% of all patients. In the overall cohort, survival at day 30 was 35.8%, which was higher than predicted by the SAVE score (20%) or by the SAPS-II score (6.9%). Right heart catheterization indicated a marked decrease of PCWP after addition of the device to VA-ECMO. CONCLUSIONS: The strategy of percutaneous LV unloading using a transaortic LV assist device in combination with VA-ECMO improved outcome in an all-comers cohort compared to established risk scores. A prospective, randomized study is needed to further investigate this approach.

Severe ischaemic cardiogenic shock with cardiac arrest and prolonged asystole: a case report.

BACKGROUND: Extracorporeal life support (ECLS) by veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) is a valuable treatment option during severe cardiogenic shock and during cardiac arrest unresponsive to conventional management. It is applied to bridge the first critical days until the patient recovers or a destination therapy is established.1 Prolonged episodes without cardiac electrical activity during VA-ECMO are a major problem, as they may cause pulmonary oedema and severe left ventricular (LV) thrombosis.2 Here, we report a case of a 50-year-old man who presented with a 30-h episode of complete absence of electromechanical activity during ECLS and finally recovered with favourable neurological outcome. CASE SUMMARY: A 50-year-old man with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest was transferred to a peripheral hospital after initial successful cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). In the emergency room, he presented with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and cardiogenic shock with third-degree atrioventricular block. After immediate insertion of a temporary pacemaker, he received percutaneous coronary intervention of the left anterior descending artery and the circumflex artery. Due to worsening cardiogenic shock, ECLS with VA-ECMO and an Impella® pump was established. Cumulative time of CPR (out of hospital and in hospital) was 41 min. After transfer to our institution's intensive care unit, both the heart's mechanical and electrical activity ceased for more than 24 h and recovered slowly thereafter. After showing promising neurological outcome, epicardial pacemaker leads, an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator, and finally, a LV assist device were implanted. He was dismissed into rehabilitation with only minor neurological residua 6 weeks later. DISCUSSION: Impella® implantation on top of VA-ECMO may be considered beneficial in the therapy of prolonged cardiac arrest.3 While VA-ECMO ensures oxygenation and organ perfusion, Impella® vents the left ventricle and enhances coronary perfusion. In the presented case, a favourable outcome was reached despite an 'untreated' prolonged absence of cardiac electromechanical activity. Under specific circumstances during ECLS with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and Impella®, waiving of temporary pacing may be considered in absent cardiac electromechanical activity to avoid further complications.

Irreversible Total Loss of Brain Function and Organ Donation in Patients with Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage.

OBJECTIVE: Aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) is a life-threatening disease with an often fatal clinical course leading to irreversible loss of brain function (ILBF) (i.e., brain death). The purpose of this study was to assess the prevalence and characteristics of patients with aSAH who became organ donors after diagnosis of ILBF. METHODS: Anonymized clinical data sets of 395 patients treated for aSAH at a university medical center from January 2011 to December 2016 were retrospectively analyzed. Prevalence of consent for organ donation and clinical characteristics, including parameters for diagnosis of irreversible loss of brain function, were assessed. RESULTS: After initial admission to the intensive care unit, 18.0% of patients (n = 71) died (Glasgow Outcome Scale score 1). Intracerebral hemorrhage occurred in 42.3% of patients who died, aneurysmal rebleeding occurred in 19.7%, and intraventricular hemorrhage occurred in 87.3%. In 50.7% of patients who died (n = 36), ILBF was diagnosed, and 32.4% (n = 23) of these patients became organ donors. In 55.6%, additional diagnostic electroencephalography was performed. Male patients significantly more often became organ donors than female patients (P = 0.008). ILBF with subsequent organ donation was predominantly seen in patients <60 years old. A total 85 of organs were explanted for donation, including 42 kidneys, 21 livers, 3 pancreas, 11 hearts and 8 lungs. CONCLUSIONS: ILBF in the setting of fatal aSAH is a prevalent diagnosis with complex demands for neurointensive care physicians. We demonstrated the clinical characteristics and epidemiologic factors of patients with aSAH converting to organ donors.

[Pulmonary embolism]. / Lungenembolie.

Acute pulmonary embolism is an important differential diagnosis of acute chest pain. The clinical signs are often non-specific. However, diagnosis and therapy must be done quickly in order to reduce morbidity and mortality. The new (2014) European guidelines for acute pulmonary embolism (PE) focus on risk-adapted diagnostic algorithms and prognosis adapted therapy concepts. According to the hemodynamic presentation the division in a high-risk group (unstable patient with persistent hypotension or shock) or in non-high-risk groups (hemodynamically stable) was proposed. In the high-risk group the immediate diagnosis is usually done by multidetector spiral computed tomography (MDCT) and primarily the medical therapy of right ventricular dysfunction and thrombolysis is recommended.In the non-high-risk group, this is subdivided into an intermediate-risk group and low-risk group, the diagnosis algorithm based on the PE-pretest probability--determined by validated scores. Moreover, the diagnosis is usually secured by MDCT--the new gold standard in the PE-diagnosis, scores, or it can be primarily ruled out due to the high negative predictive value of D-dimer determination. To improve the prognostic risk stratification in non-high-risk group patients the additional detection of right ventricular dysfunction (MDCT, echocardiography), cardiac biomarkers (troponin, NT proBNP) and validated scores (e.g. Pulmonary Embolism Severity Index) is recommended. Therefore, the intermediate-risk group can be further subdivided. For treatment of non-high-risk group patients, the initial anticoagulation (except those with severe renal insufficiency) using low molecular weight heparin/fondaparinux and conversion to vitamin-K antagonists or alternatively with direct oral anticoagulants (DOAK) is recommended. Hemodynamically stable patients with right ventricular dysfunction and myocardial ischemia (Intermediate-high-risk group patients) but with clinically progressive hemodynamic decompensation may benefit from systemic thrombolysis as well. Due to the high risk of bleeding in the PEITHO study, however, a critical individual risk-benefit evaluation should be done. A dose reduced systemic or local ultrasound-assisted thrombolysis could gain importance in the future. For very selected patients in the low-risk group early outpatient treatment could be considered.The diagnosis and treatment of pulmonary embolism remains complex. Improved algorithms support the diagnosis procedures and therapy decisions. Direct oral anticoagulants are a new first-line therapy alternative for hemodynamically stable non-high-risk patients.