Prevalence of bilateral vestibulopathy among older adults above 65 years on the indication of vestibular impairment and the association with Dynamic Gait Index and Dizziness Handicap Inventory.

PURPOSE: To estimate the prevalence of bilateral vestibulopathy (BV) and evaluate the association with, and concurrent validity of the Dynamic Gait Index (DGI) and the Dizziness Handicap Inventory (DHI) in diagnosing BV based on video head impulse test (vHIT) among older adults ≥65 years referred to a geriatric falls clinic on suspicion of vestibular impairment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The vHIT was applied as a reference standard of BV to estimate diagnostic parameters for optimal cut-off scores of DGI and DHI applied separately and in combination. RESULTS: Two-hundred medical records were reviewed (70% women, mean age 79.4 years). The prevalence of BV was 9%. DGI was weakly associated with BV: Odds Ratio (OR) 1.15 (95% confidence interval (CI): 1.01; 1.31), with a 93% sensitivity and 47% specificity of a cut-off score of 16. The total score of DHI showed no association with BV: OR 1.01 (95% CI: 0.98; 1.04). The concurrent validity for BV and DGI and/or DHI were found to be inadequate. CONCLUSIONS: A prevalence of 9% underlines the relevance for assessment of BV. Only a weak association between DGI and/or DHI and BV was found. Thus, vHIT remains the preferred test for detecting BV in geriatric fall assessments.IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATIONBilateral vestibulopathy (BV) has numerous negative consequences for older adults and the prevalence is high among older adults referred to a geriatric falls clinic on suspicion of vestibular impairment.The Dynamic Gait Index (DGI) and the Dizziness Handicap Inventory (DHI) are not valid alternatives to the Video Head Impulse Test (vHIT) when assessing BV among geriatric outpatients.

The reliability and agreement of scores in a novel balance measure for older adults: Specific Training According to BaLance Evaluation (STABLE).

PURPOSE: Falls are the leading cause of injury and premature death among community dwelling elderly but can be prevented through comprehensive balance rehabilitation which ideally targets the patient's specific needs. In this study, we evaluate the reliability and agreement of six novel clinical measures of different balance domains which applied in a patient-specific balance profile guides exercise prescription in balance rehabilitation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The intra-rater reliability and agreement of the six measures were evaluated on the same day in six different cohorts of elderly with balance disability (n = 65-100). Further, the inter-day intra-rater and inter-rater and test-retest reliability and agreement of the measures and the balance profile were evaluated (n = 100). RESULTS: The intra-day intra-rater reliability and agreement was moderate to excellent (ICC2.1 = 0.525-0.968, with SDC% = 6.5-284.9%) but poor to good for the inter-day conditions (ICC2.1 = 0.123-0.832, with SDC% = 6.6-229.2%). The reliability of classifying the lower domain in the balance profile was fair, with kappa = 0.56 (95%CI 0.36-0.76). CONCLUSIONS: Five of the six measures may reliably be applied to measure balance disability and to guide rehabilitation.Implications for rehabilitationBalance disability is the primary reason for accidental falls among elderly but can be prevented through comprehensive individualized balance rehabilitation.Specific Training According to BaLance Evaluation (STABLE) is a novel approach for designing effective balance exercises based on clinical measurements.Five of the six measures are reliable when applied in a patient-specific balance profile to guide rehabilitation following the STABLE approach.

The responsiveness and predictive validity of the de Morton Mobility Index in geriatric rehabilitation.

INTRODUCTION: The de Morton Mobility Index (DEMMI) is a unidimensional clinical instrument proven reliable and valid for measuring mobility in the elderly, but its responsiveness has not been evaluated when applying the methodology recommended by COSMIN. PURPOSE: To evaluate the responsiveness and the predictive validity of the DEMMI. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Elderly people, referred for municipality-based rehabilitation, were consecutively included. Eight hypotheses regarding the relationship between the change scores in the DEMMI and other functional measures of mobility were tested by assessing the participants before and after rehabilitation. Three months after completing the rehabilitation, the participants' functional status was evaluated. RESULTS: 250 elderly people (mean age 85 years, 63% women) were included. The change scores in the DEMMI and the other measures correlated (r = 0.422 to 0.547), but only three out of the eight hypotheses were confirmed. A DEMMI score of less than 48 and less than 67 can predict inability of ambulating close to the participant's residence and using public transport, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: We found a moderate responsiveness and a high predictive validity of the DEMMI score. The DEMMI appears to be an appropriate instrument for monitoring change in mobility and predicting functional status among elderly patients undergoing rehabilitation.Implications for rehabilitationThe de Morton Mobility Index (DEMMI) is a clinical instrument for measuring mobility.This study shows that the DEMMI was responsive to change in mobility and predicted disability among a diverse group of elderly individuals referred to rehabilitation after hospital discharge.The DEMMI is applicable as an outcome measure in trials investigating the effect of rehabilitation and for clinical decision-making concerning geriatric rehabilitation.

Fully versus conventionally guided implant placement by dental students: A randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: To compare fully guided with conventionally guided implant surgery performed by dental students in terms of deviation of actual implant position from an ideal implant position. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-five patients in need of 26 straightforward implant-supported single crowns were randomly allocated to a fully guided (FG, n = 14) or a conventionally guided (CG, n = 12) implant surgery. In the preoperative CBCTs, 3 experienced investigators placed a virtual implant in the ideal position, twice, allowing deviational analysis in the facio-lingual (coronal) and mesio-distal (sagittal) planes for 7 parameters. Facio-lingual crestal deviation, facio-lingual apical deviation, facio-lingual angular deviation, mesio-distal crestal deviation, mesio-distal apical deviation, mesio-distal angular deviation, and vertical deviation between the ideal, virtually placed position and actual implant position for the FG and CG groups were compared statistically (p < .05). RESULTS: Statistically significant differences between ideal and actual implant position were only seen for the facio-lingual apical deviation (p = .047) and for the facio-lingual angular deviation (p = .019), where the CG group deviated more from the ideal position than the FG group. The 5 other examined variables did not show any significant differences, and none of the implants in the FG group and CG group were placed in conflict with the clinical guidelines. CONCLUSIONS: The present study reported no difference in 5 out of 7 deviational parameters concerning actual implant position in relation to ideal implant position between a FG and CG implant placement protocol performed by dental students. Facio-lingual angular deviation and apical deviation were lower, when a FG protocol was followed. All implants were positioned according to clinical guidelines.

Interrater reliability of the Volume-Viscosity Swallow Test; screening for dysphagia among hospitalized elderly medical patients.

BACKGROUND: Oropharyngeal dysphagia (OD) is prevalent among medical and geriatric patients admitted due to acute illness and it is associated with malnutrition, increased length of stay and increased mortality. A valid and reliable bedside screening test for patients at risk of OD is essential in order to detect patients in need of further assessment. The Volume-Viscosity Swallow Test (V-VST) has been shown to be a valid screening test for OD in mixed outpatient populations. However, as reliability of the test has yet to be investigated in a population of medical and geriatric patients admitted due to acute illness, we aimed to determine the interrater reliability of the V-VST in this clinical setting. Reporting in this study is in accordance with proposed guidelines for the reporting of reliability and agreement studies (GRRAS). METHODS: In three Danish hospitals (CRD-BFH, CRD-GH, NDR-H) 11 skilled occupational therapists examined an unselected group of 110 patients admitted to geriatric or medical wards. In an overall agreement phase raters reached ≥80% agreement before data collection phase was commenced. The V-VST was applied to patients twice within maximum one hour by raters who administrated the test in an order based on randomization, blinded to each other's results. Agreement, Kappa values, weighed Kappa values and Kappa adjusted for bias and prevalence are reported. RESULTS: The interrater reliability of V-VST as screening test for OD in patients admitted to geriatric or medical wards was substantial with an overall Kappa value of 0.77 (95% CI 0.65-0.89) however interrater reliability varied among hospitals ranging from 0.37 (95% CI -0.01 to 0.41) to 0.85 (95% CI 0.75-1.00). Interrater reliability of the accompanying recommendations of volume and viscosity was moderate with a weighted kappa value of 0.55 (95% CI 0.37-0.73) for viscosity and 0.53 (95% CI 0.36-0.7) for volume. The overall prevalence of OD was 34.5%, ranging from 8% to 53.6% across hospitals. The prevalence and bias adjusted Kappa value (PABAK) was 0.76 (range 0.6-0.85). Mean time to perform the test was 13.1 min (SD 6.924). CONCLUSIONS: The V-VST seems to be a moderately reliable screening tool for detecting OD among medical and geriatric patients. However, the recommendations of volume and viscosity add limited clinical value to the test.