ABSTRACT
Chronic neuropathic pain is often very difficult to treat effectively and constitutes a significant burden on both the affected patients and society. Invasive neuromodulation, electrical stimulation of specific nerve structures with implanted electrodes, can be a viable treatment option for patients suffering from severe, chronic neuropathic pain where conventional treatment has not provided sufficient pain relief. Careful patient selection is vital. This paper provides an overview of the treatment field in Denmark.
Subject(s)
Pain Management , Denmark , Electric Stimulation , Humans , Patient SelectionABSTRACT
Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) has proven an effective tool for the treatment of brain tumors, arteriovenous malformation, and functional conditions. However, radiation-induced therapeutic effect in viable cells in functional SRS is also suggested. Evaluation of the proposed modulatory effect of irradiation on neuronal activity without causing cellular death requires the knowledge of radiation dose tolerance at very small tissue volume. Therefore, we aimed to establish a porcine model to study the effects of ultra-high radiosurgical doses in small volumes of the brain. Five minipigs received focal stereotactic radiosurgery with single large doses of 40-100 Gy to 5-7.5 mm fields in the left primary motor cortex and the right subcortical white matter, and one animal remained as unirradiated control. The animals were followed-up with serial MRI, PET scans, and histology 6 months post-radiation. We observed a dose-dependent relation of the histological and MRI changes at 6 months post-radiation. The necrotic lesions were seen in the grey matter at 100 Gy and in white matter at 60 Gy. Furthermore, small volume radiosurgery at different dose levels induced vascular, as well as neuronal cell changes and glial cell remodeling.
Subject(s)
Brain/surgery , Necrosis , Radiation Injuries/pathology , Radiosurgery/adverse effects , Animals , Brain/pathology , Female , Imaging, Three-Dimensional/methods , Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography/methods , Radiation Injuries/diagnostic imaging , Radiation Injuries/etiology , Swine , Swine, MiniatureABSTRACT
Tumor treating fields (TTFields) are increasingly used to treat newly diagnosed and recurrent glioblastoma (GBM). Recently, the authors proposed a new and comprehensive method for efficacy estimation based on singular value decomposition of the sequential field distributions. The method accounts for all efficacy parameters known to affect anti-cancer efficacy of TTFields, i.e. intensity, exposure time, and spatial field correlation. In this paper, we describe a further development, which enables individual optimization of the TTFields activation cycle. The method calculates the optimal device settings to obtain a desired average field intensity in the tumor, while minimizing unwanted field correlation. Finite element (FE) methods were used to estimate the electrical field distribution in the head. The computational head model was based on MRI data from a GBM patient. Sequential field vectors were post-processed using singular value decomposition. A linear transformation was applied to the resulting field matrix to reduce fractional anisotropy (FA) of the principal field components in the tumor. Results were computed for four realistic transducer array layouts. The optimization method significantly reduced FA and maintained the average field intensity in the tumor. The algorithm produced linear gain factors to be applied to the transducer array pairs producing the sequential fields. FA minimization was associated with an increase in total current delivered through the head during a activation cycle. Minimized FA can be obtained for an unchanged total current level, albeit with a reduction in average field intensity. We present an algorithm for optimization of the TTFields activation cycle settings. The method can be used to minimize the spatial correlation between sequential TTFields, while adjusting the total current level and mean field intensity to a desired level. Future studies are needed to validate clinical impact and assess sensitivity towards model parameters.