Cochlear Implantation in Sporadic Intralabyrinthine Schwannomas with Single-Sided Deafness: Implications for Binaural Hearing.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Intralabyrinthine schwannomas (ILSs) may have detrimental effects on ipsilateral hearing, commonly leading to single-sided deafness (SSD). Cochlear implantation in patients with ILSs is an option to partly restore ipsilateral hearing; however, the available literature fails to account for the binaural hearing benefits of a cochlear implant (CI) for ILSs. METHODS: We prospectively evaluated SSD patients with sporadic ILS undergoing cochlear implantation with simultaneous tumor resection (n = 10) or with tumor observation (n = 1). Patients completed the Speech, Spatial and Qualities Questionnaire (SSQ12) and the Nijmegen Cochlear Implant Questionnaire (NCIQ) pre- and postoperatively, as well as the Bern Benefit in Single-Sided Deafness (BBSSD) questionnaire postoperatively. Patients were also tested postoperatively with and without their CI to measure the effect on localization ability and binaural summation, squelch, and head shadow. RESULTS: Evaluation was completed for nine and six patients (subjective and objective data, respectively). The CI significantly improved the speech reception threshold (SRT) in the head shadow condition where the target signal was presented to the CI side and the noise to the front (SCIN0). On the other hand, the SRTs in the colocated condition (S0N0) and the condition where the target signal was presented to the front and the noise to the CI side (S0NCI) were unaffected by the CI. The mean localization error decreased significantly from 102° to 61° (p = 0.0031) with the addition of a CI. The scores from SSQ12 demonstrated nonsignificant changes. For NCIQ, the self-esteem and the social interaction domains increased significantly but insignificantly for the remaining domains. The BBSSD responses ranged from +0.5 to +3.5 points. CONCLUSION: After implantation, patients achieved significantly better scores across some of the patient-reported and objective parameters. In addition to reporting on a number of ILS cases where implantation was performed, the study is the first of its kind to document patient-reported and objective binaural hearing improvement after cochlear implantation in patients with ILS and, thereby, lends support to the active management of ILS.

Evaluation of a Fast Method to Measure High-Frequency Audiometry Based on Bayesian Learning.

This study aimed to assess the validity of a high-frequency audiometry tool based on Bayesian learning to provide a reliable, repeatable, automatic, and fast test to clinics. The study involved 85 people (138 ears) who had their high-frequency thresholds measured with three tests: standard audiometry (SA), alternative forced choice (AFC)-based algorithm, and Bayesian active (BA) learning-based algorithm. The results showed median differences within ±5 dB up to 10 kHz when comparing the BA with the other two tests, and median differences within ±10 dB at higher frequencies. The variability increased from lower to higher frequencies. The BA showed lower thresholds compared to the SA at the majority of the frequencies. The results of the different tests were consistent across groups (age, hearing loss, and tinnitus). The data for the BA showed high test-retest reliability (>90%). The time required for the BA was shorter than for the AFC (4 min vs. 13 min). The data suggest that the BA test for high-frequency audiometry could be a good candidate for clinical screening. It would add reliable and significant information without adding too much time to the visit.