Determining the association between polymorphisms of the DAT1 and DRD4 genes with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in children from Java Island.

Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is one of the most common neurobehavioural in the children. Genetic factor is known one of the factors which contributed in ADHD development. VNTR polymorphism in 3'UTR exon 15 of DAT1 gene and exon 3 of DRD4 gene are reported to be associated in ADHD. In this study we examine the association of ADHD with VNTR polymorphism of DAT1 and DRD4 gene in Indonesian children. Sixty-five ADHD children and 70 normal children (6-13 years of age), were included in the study, we matched by age and gender. ADHD was diagnosed by DSM-IV. We performed a casecontrol study to found the association between ADHD and VNTR polymorphism of DAT1 and DRD4 genes. The 10-repeat allele of DAT1 and 2-repeat allele of DRD4 were higher in Indonesian children. Although the frequency of these allele was higher, but it was similar both in ADHD and control groups. Neither DAT1 nor DRD4 gene showed showed significant difference in genotype distribution and frequency allele between both groups (p > 0.05). No association between ADHD and VNTR polymorphism of DAT1 and DRD4 genes found in Indonesian children. This data suggest that DAT1 and DRD4 do not contribute to etiology of ADHD in Indonesian children. Further studies are needed to clarify association between VNTR polymorphism of DAT1 and DRD4 genetic with ADHD of Indonesian children in larger sample size and family based study.

A Rapid, Accurate and Simple Screening Method for Spinal Muscular Atrophy: High-Resolution Melting Analysis Using Dried Blood Spots on Filter Paper.

BACKGROUND: Spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) is a common neuromuscular disorder caused by mutation of the survival of the motor neuron 1 (SMN1) gene. More than 95% of SMA patients carry a homozygous deletion of SMN1. SMA can be screened for by polymerase chain reaction and high-resolution melting analysis (PCR-HRMA) using DNA extracted from dried blood spots (DBSs) stored on filter paper. However, there are two major problems with this approach. One is the frequent poor quality/quantity of DNA extracted from DBSs on filter paper, and the other is the difficulty in designing primer sets or probes to separate allele-specific melting curves. In this study, we addressed these problems and established a rapid, accurate and simple screening system for SMA with PCR-HRMA using DNA extracted from DBSs on filter paper. METHODS: Seventy individuals were assayed in this study, 42 SMA patients and 28 controls, all of whom had been previously been screened for SMA by polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis (PCR-RFLP) using DNA extracted from freshly collected blood. In this study, the DNA of each individual was extracted from dried blood that had been spotted onto cards and stored at room temperature (20 - 25 degrees C) for between 1 and 8 years. PCR amplification of 30 or 45 cycles was performed using 50 ng of DNA and was immediately followed by HRMA. SMN1 and SMN2 products were co-amplified using a previously designed primer set (R111 and 541C770) containing two single nucleotide differences. RESULTS: The absorbance ratio at 260/280 of DNA extracted from DBSs ranged from 1.49 to 2.1 (mean ± SD; 1.66 ± 0.12), suggesting high-purity DNA. Thirty cycles of PCR amplification were insufficient to amplify the target alleles; PCR with 45 cycles was, however, successful in 69 out of 70 samples. PCR-HRMA using the R111/541C770 primer set enabled separation of the normalized melting curves of the samples with no SMN1 from those with SMN1 and SMN2. CONCLUSIONS: DBSs on filter paper can be a good source of DNA for the diagnosis of diseases and PCR-HRMA using DNA extracted from DBSs is an alternative method to detect the SMN1 deletion. These findings suggest that the SMA screening system using PCR-HRMA with DBSs on filter paper is practicable in a large population study over a long time period.

Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD): age related change of completion time and error rates of Stroop test.

BACKGROUND: Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) is a common neurobehavioral problem in children throughout the world. The Stroop test has been widely used for the evaluation of ADHD symptoms. However, the age-related change of the Stroop test results has not been fully clarified until now. METHODS: Sixty-five ADHD and 70 age-matched control children aged 6-13 years were enrolled in this study. ADHD was diagnosed based on DSM-IV criteria. We examined the completion time and error rates of the Congruent Stroop test (CST) and Incongruent Stroop test (IST) in ADHD and control children. RESULTS: No significant difference was observed in the completion time for CST or IST between the ADHD and control children at 6-9 years old. However, ADHD children at 10-13 years old showed significantly delayed completion time for the CST and IST compared with controls of the same age. As for the error rates of the CST and IST, ADHD and control children at 6-9 years old showed no difference. However, error rates of CST and IST in the ADHD children at 10-13 years were significantly higher than those of control of the same age. CONCLUSIONS: Age may influence the results of Stroop test in ADHD children. For the ages of 10-13 years old, the Stroop test clearly separates ADHD children from control children, suggesting that it may be a useful screening tool for ADHD among preadolescent children.

Two Japanese Patients With SMA Type 1 Suggest that Axonal-SMN May Not Modify the Disease Severity.

BACKGROUND: Spinal muscular atrophy is caused by survival motor neuron gene SMN1 mutations. SMN1 produces a full-length SMN1 protein isoform encoded by exons 1-7, and an axonal-SMN protein isoform encoded by exons 1-3 and intron 3. The axonal-SMN protein is expressed only in the embryonic period and plays a significant role in axonal growth. However, there has been no report on contribution of axonal-SMN to spinal muscular atrophy severity until now. PATIENTS: Two Japanese boys with spinal muscular atrophy type 1 in our study presented with generalized muscle weakness and respiratory insufficiency soon after birth and required an artificial ventilator from early infancy. Patient 1 was compound heterozygous for two SMN1 mutations, whole-gene deletion, and an intragenic mutation (c.819_820insT). He retained one copy of SMN1 producing the N-terminal part of SMN1 including axonal-SMN. On the other hand, patient 2 was homozygous for SMN1 deletion. Both of them showed the same copy number of spinal muscular atrophy-modifying genes, NAIP and SMN2. These findings suggested that the C-terminal domain of full-length SMN1 determined the severity, irrespective of presence or absence of axonal-SMN expression. CONCLUSION: In patient 1, the C-terminal domain of full-length SMN1 determined spinal muscular atrophy severity, rather than the axonal-SMN, one copy of which could be present and intact. The presence or absence of axonal-SMN may not impact disease severity in spinal muscular atrophy type 1 patients.

SMA screening system using dried blood spots on filter paper: application of COP-PCR to the SMN1 deletion test.

BACKGROUND: Spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) is a common neuromuscular disorder caused by mutations in SMN1. More than 95% of SMA patients carry homozygous SMN1 deletions. Thus, the SMN1 deletion test should be performed initially as part of the diagnostic process. However, SMN2, a highly homologous gene, hampers detection of SMN1 deletion. To differentiate between SMN1 and SMN2, many analysis methods have been developed yet they are not all available worldwide. AIM: To establish a simple but accurate SMN1-deletion detection system that can be used worldwide. METHODS: Fifty DNA samples (29 SMA patients and 21 controls) from dried blood spots (DBS) on filter paper were assayed. All participants had previously been screened for SMA by PCR-restriction fragment length polymorphism (PCR-RFLP) using DNA extracted from freshly collected blood. DNA was extracted from DBS that had been stored at room temperature (20-25℃) for between 1 and 8 years. Competitive oligonucleotide priming-PCR (COP-PCR) was performed to distinguish SMN1 and SMN2 exon7. RESULTS: DNA yield from an 11-mm diameter DBS circle was 21,171 ± 7,485 ng (mean ± SD), with an 260/280 OD ratio from 1.49 to 2.1(mean ± SD; 1.67 ±0.13). Nucleotide sequencing confirmed gene-specific amplification of SMN1 and SMN2 by COP-PCR. SMN1 and SMN2 COP-PCR results are completely consistent with those obtained by PCR-RFLP. CONCLUSION: We have combined DNA extraction from DBS on filter paper with COP-PCR that specifically detects SMN1 and SMN2, establishing a new SMN1-deletion detection system with practical application worldwide.

Trinucleotide insertion in the SMN2 promoter may not be related to the clinical phenotype of SMA.

BACKGROUND: More than 90% of spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) patients show homozygous deletion of SMN1 (survival motor neuron 1). They retain SMN2, a highly homologous gene to SMN1, which may partially compensate for deletion of SMN1. Although the promoter sequences of these two genes are almost identical, a GCC insertion polymorphism has been identified at c.-320_-321 in the SMN1 promoter. We have also found this insertion polymorphism in an SMN2 promoter in an SMA patient (Patient A) who has SMA type 2/3. PURPOSE: The aims of this study were to determine the frequency of the GCC insertion polymorphism in SMA patients, and to evaluate its effect on SMN transcription efficiency. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fifty-one SMA patients, including Patient A, were involved in this study. SMN2 transcript levels in white blood cells were measured by real-time polymerase chain reaction. Screening of the GCC insertion polymorphism was performed using denaturing high-pressure liquid chromatography. The transcription efficiency of the promoter with the insertion mutation was evaluated using a reporter-gene assay. RESULTS: All SMA patients in this study were homozygous for SMN1 deletion. Patient A retained two copies of SMN2, and showed only a small amount of SMN2 transcript in white blood cells. We detected a GCC insertion polymorphism at c.-320_-321 only in Patient A, and not in 50 other SMA patients. The polymorphism had a slight but significant negative effect on transcription efficiency. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: Patient A was judged to be an exceptional case of SMA, because the GCC insertion polymorphism rarely exists in SMN1-deleted SMA patients. The GCC insertion polymorphism did not enhance the transcriptional efficiency of SMN2. Thus, this GCC insertion polymorphism in the SMN2 promoter may not be associated with the milder phenotype of the patient. Patient A suggests that there are other unknown factors modifying the clinical phenotype of SMA.