Experiences with abortion counselling in Mexico City and Colombia: addressing women's fears and concerns.

Despite liberalised abortion laws in Colombia and Mexico City, ongoing abortion-related stigma and lack of knowledge of abortion laws can impede access to care. Organisations offering abortion services may support women seeking services by providing counselling and information. We conducted 30 in-depth interviews with women in Colombia and Mexico City after their abortion to understand their feelings of stigma, fears and concerns before accessing services, and how abortion counselling addressed those concerns. Women in both regions cited concerns about abortion safety, fears of judgement from community members and some reported self-judgement or guilt. Before arriving to care, women in Colombia were unsure if they qualified for legal abortion under the current law, and many reported fearing legal or social repercussions for seeking an abortion, whereas women in Mexico knew they could access a legal abortion in Mexico City. Women in all clinics reported satisfaction with the counselling services and felt most of their concerns were addressed. However, most women said they continued to fear judgement from members of the community after their procedure. Service-delivery organisations can provide supportive services and decrease women's fears and concerns, although interventions in communities are also needed to reduce stigma and improve information.

Experience obtaining legal abortion in Uruguay: knowledge, attitudes, and stigma among abortion clients.

BACKGROUND: The abortion law in Uruguay changed in 2012 to allow first trimester abortion on request. Implementation of the law in Uruguay has been lauded, but barriers to care, including abortion stigma, remain. This study aimed to assess women's experiences seeking abortion services and related attitudes and knowledge following implementation of the law in Uruguay. METHODS: We interviewed 207 eligible women seeking abortion services at a high-volume public hospital in Montevideo in 2014. We generated univariate frequencies to describe women's experiences in care. We conducted regression analysis to examine variations in experiences of stigma by women's age and number of abortions. RESULTS: Most of the women felt that abortion was a right, were satisfied with the services they received, and agreed with the abortion law. However, 70% found the five-day waiting period unnecessary. Women experienced greater self-judgement than worries about being judged by others. Younger women in the sample (ages 18-21) reported being more worried about judgment than women 22 years or older (1.02 vs. 0.71 on the ILAS sub-scale). One quarter of participants reported feeling judged while obtaining services. Women with more than one abortion had nearly three times the odds of reporting feeling judged. CONCLUSIONS: These findings highlight the need to address abortion stigma even after the law is changed. Some considerations from Uruguay that may be relevant to other jurisdictions reforming abortion laws include: the need for strategies to reduce judgmental behavior from staff and clinicians towards women seeking abortions, including training in counseling skills and empathic communication; addressing stigmatizing attitudes about abortion through community outreach or communications campaigns; mitigating the potential stigma that may be perpetuated through policies to prevent "repeat" abortions; ensuring that younger women and those with more than one abortion feel welcome and are not mistreated during care; and assessing the necessity of a waiting period. The rapid implementation of legal, voluntary abortion services in Uruguay can serve in many ways as an exemplar, and these findings may inform the process of abortion law reform in other countries.