Respiratory-gated 18F-FDG PET imaging in lung cancer: effects on sensitivity and specificity.

BACKGROUND: Respiratory motion is known to deteriorate positron emission tomography (PET) images and may lead to potential diagnostic errors when a standardized uptake value (SUV) cut-off threshold is used to discriminate between benign and malignant lesions. PURPOSE: To evaluate and compare ungated and respiratory-gated 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose PET/computed tomography (CT) methods for the characterization of pulmonary nodules. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The list-mode acquisition during respiratory-gated PET was combined with a short breath-hold CT scan to form the CT-based images. We studied 48 lesions in 43 patients. PET images were analyzed in terms of the maximum SUV (SUV(max)) and the lesion location. RESULTS: Using receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curves, the optimal SUV cut-off thresholds for the ungated and CT-based methods were calculated to be 2.0 and 2.2, respectively. The corresponding sensitivity values were 83% and 92%, respectively, with a specificity of 67% for both methods. The two methods gave equivalent performance levels for the upper and middle lobes (sensitivity 93%, specificity 62%). They differed for the lower lobes, where the CT-based method outperformed the ungated method (sensitivity values of 90% and 70%, respectively, and a specificity of 73% with both methods) - especially for lesions smaller than 15 mm. CONCLUSION: The CT-based method increased sensitivity and did not diminish specificity, compared with the ungated method. It was more efficient than the ungated method for imaging the lower lobes and smallest lesions, which are most affected by respiratory motion.

Initial clinical results for breath-hold CT-based processing of respiratory-gated PET acquisitions.

PURPOSE: Respiratory motion causes uptake in positron emission tomography (PET) images of chest structures to spread out and misregister with the CT images. This misregistration can alter the attenuation correction and thus the quantisation of PET images. In this paper, we present the first clinical results for a respiratory-gated PET (RG-PET) processing method based on a single breath-hold CT (BH-CT) acquisition, which seeks to improve diagnostic accuracy via better PET-to-CT co-registration. We refer to this method as "CT-based" RG-PET processing. METHODS: Thirteen lesions were studied. Patients underwent a standard clinical PET protocol and then the CT-based protocol, which consists of a 10-min List Mode RG-PET acquisition, followed by a shallow end-expiration BH-CT. The respective performances of the CT-based and clinical PET methods were evaluated by comparing the distances between the lesions' centroids on PET and CT images. SUV(MAX) and volume variations were also investigated. RESULTS: The CT-based method showed significantly lower (p = 0.027) centroid distances (mean change relative to the clinical method = -49%; range = -100% to 0%). This led to higher SUV(MAX) (mean change = +33%; range = -4% to 69%). Lesion volumes were significantly lower (p = 0.022) in CT-based PET volumes (mean change = -39%: range = -74% to -1%) compared with clinical ones. CONCLUSIONS: A CT-based RG-PET processing method can be implemented in clinical practice with a small increase in radiation exposure. It improves PET-CT co-registration of lung lesions and should lead to more accurate attenuation correction and thus SUV measurement.

The usefulness of 99mTc sulfur colloid bone marrow scintigraphy combined with 111In leucocyte scintigraphy in prosthetic joint infection.

AIM: To assess the extent to which bone marrow scintigraphy (BMS) makes the interpretation of leucocyte scintigraphy (LS) easier and improves its diagnostic value. METHODS: Seventy-three 111In LSs, 99mTc hydroxymethylene diphosphonate bone scintigraphies (BSs) and 99mTc sulfur colloid BMSs were performed in 60 patients with suspected infection related to a hip prosthesis or knee prosthesis, either in situ (+group, n = 43) or after removal for septic loosening (-group, n = 30). Bacteriological samples were obtained from all patients. LS was interpreted together with BS (LS-BS) or with BMS (LS-BMS) by three independent readers. RESULTS: The concordance among readers, estimated by the kappa test, was average with LS-BS (kappa/kappam coefficients = 0.58, 0.58 and 0.46, respectively, for the three pairs of readers) and excellent with LS-BMS (kappa/kappam coefficients = 1.00 for the three pairs of readers). With LS-BS, 64/219 interpretations were equivocal whereas only one was equivocal with LS-BMS. Sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of LS-BMS were, respectively, 80%, 94% and 91% in the +group, and 33%, 100% and 93% in the -group. CONCLUSION: We conclude that (1) the interpretation of the results for LS-BMS is very easy, in contrast to LS-BS; (2) the diagnostic value of LS-BMS for detecting infected joint prostheses is good; and (3) additional data are needed to assess the accuracy of LS-BMS when the prosthesis has been removed.