ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: The retention of cardiopulmonary resuscitation skills and the ideal frequency of retraining remain unanswered. This study investigated the retention of cardiopulmonary resuscitation skills by medical students for up to 42 months after training. METHODS: In a cross-sectional study, 205 medical students received 10 hours of training in basic life support in 3 practical classes, during their first semester at school. Then, they were divided into 4 groups, according to the time elapsed since the training: 73 after 1 month, 55 after 18 months, 41 after 30 months, and 36 after 42 months. Nineteen cardiopulmonary resuscitation skills and 8 potential technical errors were evaluated by mannequin-based simulation and reviewed using filming. RESULTS: The mean retention of the skills was 90% after 1 month, 74% after 18 months, 62% after 30 months, and 61% after 42 months (P < 0.001). The depth of chest compressions had the greatest retention over time (87.8%), with no significant differences among groups. Compressions performed greater than 120 per minute were less likely to be done with adequate depth. Ventilation showed a progressive decrease in retention from 93% (n = 68) after 1 month to 19% (n = 7) after 42 months (P < 0.001). All 205 students were able to turn the automated external defibrillator on and deliver the shock. CONCLUSIONS: The depth of chest compressions and the use of an automated external defibrillator were the skills with the highest retention over time. Based on a skills retention prediction curve, we suggest that 18 to 24 months as the minimum retraining interval to maintain at least 70% of skills.
Subject(s)
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation/education , Clinical Competence , Retention, Psychology , Students, Medical , Adolescent , Adult , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Patient Simulation , Time Factors , Young AdultSubject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Adult , Middle Aged , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Clinical Medicine , Internship and ResidencyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: A few recent studies have evaluated diagnostic accuracy by comparison between clinical and autopsy diagnoses in a hospital specialising in cardiology. METHODS: 406 consecutive autopsy cases during 2 years were studied. Patients were aged 47.4+/-28.4 years; 236 (58.1%) were men and 170 (41.9%) women. Diagnostic comparison was categorised in classes I to V (I, II, III and IV: discrepancy in decreasing order of importance regarding therapy and prognosis; V: concordance). Categorisation was ranked on the basis of the highest degree of discrepancy. Statistical analysis was performed with the Chi(2) test and stepwise logistic regression. RESULTS: Each age increase of 10 years added 16.2% to the risk of the diagnostic comparison to be categorised in classes I and II (major discrepancy) in comparison to classes III, IV and V (OR 1.16, 95% CI 1.07 to 1.27, p<0.001). By contrast, admission to intensive care units decreased the risk of categorisation in classes I and II by 47% (OR 0.53, 95% CI 0.32 to 0.85, p = 0.009). The most frequent diagnostic discrepancy occurred for pulmonary embolism: 30 out of 88 (34.1%) diagnoses in classes I and II. The concordance rate was 71.1% for acute myocardial infarction, 75% for aorta dissection, 73.1% for infective endocarditis and 35.2% for pulmonary embolism. CONCLUSION: Age and hospital ward influenced the distribution of diagnostic discrepancy or concordance between clinical and autopsy diagnoses. The lower discrepancy rate for myocardial infarction and infective endocarditis may be related to the fact that the study was carried out in a specialist hospital.
