Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
1.
Int Immunopharmacol ; 122: 110626, 2023 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37459785

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Accurate and rapid laboratory diagnosis of COVID-19 infection and its deterioration is one of the milestones of pandemic control. Therefore, this study aimed to compare the diagnostic and prognostic accuracy of the mainly used laboratory biomarkers (WBCS, neutrophil and lymphocyte percentages, CRP, ferritin, IL-6, D-dimer, procalcitonin, and LDH) in the sera of severe COVID-19 Egyptian patients to assess the most appropriate biomarker used in severe COVID-19 patients. METHODS: A total of 180 unvaccinated severe COVID-19 patients were enrolled in our study. Demographic data, hospitalization time, medical history, oxygen saturation, respiratory rate, oxygen supply, laboratory findings, and thorax tomography of the patients were obtained retrospectively from the hospital's electronic information system. RESULTS: Our results revealed that the levels of neutrophil percentage, CRP, IL-6, PCT, and LDH were significantly increased while lymphocyte percentage was significantly decreased among nonsurvival severe COVID-19 patients when compared with survival ones. By using ROC curve analysis, IL-6, and LDH are the most sensitive and specific markers for the prediction of bad prognosis and mortality among severe COVID-19 patients with 100% and 93% sensitivity and 93.7% specificity; respectively. IL-6 and LDH showed significant correlations with the other parameters, which suggested their association with the severity of COVID-19. CONCLUSION: By using survival severe COVID-19 patients as a control group, our results showed that blood neutrophil percentage, serum CRP, IL-6, PCT, and LDH were significantly increased in non-survivors as compared to survivors. As biomarkers, our results revealed that IL-6 and LDH are good predictors of mortality among severe COVID-19 patients.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Humans , Interleukin-6 , Retrospective Studies , Biomarkers , Lactate Dehydrogenases , C-Reactive Protein/analysis , L-Lactate Dehydrogenase
2.
Drug Chem Toxicol ; 46(3): 482-490, 2023 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35361025

ABSTRACT

N-acetyl cysteine (NAC) is a nutritional supplement and greatly applied as an antioxidant in vivo and in vitro. Therefore, this study aimed to assess the metabolic and antioxidant protective effect of NAC against selenium (Se) toxicity and gamma irradiation in rats by measuring biochemical and molecular parameters. This study was conducted on sixty rats divided into six equal different groups; control, NAC, Rad, Se, Rad + NAC, and Se + NAC groups. Oxidative/nitrosative makers (LPO, NO, and NOS), antioxidants status markers (GSH, GPx, and SOD), liver metabolic markers (LDH, SDH, and ATP), and plasma metabolic markers (Glucose, total cholesterol, and total proteins) were measured using commercial colorimetric kits while plasma corticosterone concentration was measured using commercial ELISA kit. Also, Levels of NR3C1 and Glut-2 genes expression using reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction were done. Our results revealed that Se toxicity and gamma irradiation induced significant increases in oxidative/nitrosative stress markers and a significant decrease in antioxidant status markers in the liver and adrenal tissues. Moreover, metabolic disorders were recorded as manifested by elevation of plasma ALT, Albumin, glucose and cholesterol, and decrease in protein levels associated with a significant increase in corticosterone concentration. This was also accompanied by a significant decrease in SDH activity and ATP production in the hepatic tissue. Molecular analysis showed a marked increase in NR3C1 mRNA and decrease in Glut-2 mRNA in liver tissue. However, NAC supplementation attenuated the changes induced by these toxins. Finally, we could conclude that, oral supplementation of NAC can modulate the metabolic disturbances and has protective effects in rats exposed to Se toxicity and gamma irradiation.


Subject(s)
Acetylcysteine , Antioxidants , Gamma Rays , Liver , Selenium , Animals , Rats , Acetylcysteine/metabolism , Acetylcysteine/pharmacology , Adenosine Triphosphate/metabolism , Antioxidants/pharmacology , Antioxidants/metabolism , Cholesterol/metabolism , Cholesterol/pharmacology , Corticosterone/metabolism , Corticosterone/pharmacology , Liver/drug effects , Liver/metabolism , Liver/radiation effects , Oxidative Stress , Selenium/toxicity , Gamma Rays/adverse effects , Adrenal Glands/drug effects , Adrenal Glands/metabolism , Adrenal Glands/radiation effects
3.
BMC Cardiovasc Disord ; 17(1): 234, 2017 08 24.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28836953

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Recently, transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has become the procedure of choice in high surgical risk patients with aortic stenosis (AS). However, its value is still debated in operable AS cases. We performed this meta-analysis to compare the safety and efficacy of TAVR to surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) in low-to-moderate surgical risk patients with AS. METHODS: A systematic search of five authentic databases retrieved 11 eligible studies (20,056 patients). Relevant Data were pooled as risk ratios (RRs) or standardized mean differences (SMD), with their 95% confidence interval, using Comprehensive Meta-Analysis and RevMan software for windows. RESULTS: At one-year of follow-up, the pooled effect-estimates showed no significant difference between TAVR and SAVR groups in terms of all-cause mortality (RR 1.02, 95% CI [0.83, 1.26], stroke (RR 0.83, 95%CI [0.56, 1.21]), myocardial infarction (RR 0.82, 95% CI [0.57, 1.19]), and length of hospital stay (SMD -0.04, 95% CI [-0.34, 0.26]). The incidence of major bleeding (RR 0.45, 95% CI [0.24, 0.86]) and acute kidney injury (RR 0.52, 95% CI [0.30, 0.88]) was significantly lower in the TAVR group, compared to the SAVR group. However, TAVR was associated with a higher risk of permanent pacemaker implantation (RR 2.57, 95% CI [1.36, 4.86]), vascular-access complications at 1 year (RR 1.99, 95%CI [1.04, 3.80]), and paravalvular aortic regurgitation at 30 days (RR 3.90, 95% CI [1.25, 12.12]), compared to SAVR. CONCLUSIONS: Due to the comparable mortality rates in SAVR and TAVR groups and the lower risk of life-threatening complications in the TAVR group, TAVR can be an acceptable alternative to SAVR in low-to-moderate risk patients with AS. However, larger trials with longer follow-up periods are required to compare the long-term outcomes of both techniques.


Subject(s)
Aortic Valve Stenosis/surgery , Aortic Valve/surgery , Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation , Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Aortic Valve/diagnostic imaging , Aortic Valve/physiopathology , Aortic Valve Stenosis/diagnostic imaging , Aortic Valve Stenosis/mortality , Aortic Valve Stenosis/physiopathology , Chi-Square Distribution , Female , Heart Valve Prosthesis , Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation/adverse effects , Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation/instrumentation , Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation/mortality , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Odds Ratio , Patient Selection , Prosthesis Design , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors , Time Factors , Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement/adverse effects , Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement/instrumentation , Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement/mortality , Treatment Outcome
4.
CNS Neurol Disord Drug Targets ; 16(7): 789-799, 2017.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27978795

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: There is an unmet need to develop better treatments for acute ischemic stroke (AIS). Desmoteplase is a vampire bat saliva-derived analogue of human tissue plasminogen activator. It has higher fibrin selectivity and a longer half-life, compared to alteplase. We performed this metaanalysis to investigate the safety and efficacy of desmoteplase in AIS. METHOD: A computer literature search (PubMed, EMBASE, CENTRAL, Scopus, Web of science, and clinicaltrials.gov) was carried out. Data were extracted from eligible records and analyzed using RevMan software (version 5.3 for windows). Safety and efficacy endpoints were pooled as odds ratios (ORs) for the two groups. RESULT: Five randomized trials (n=821 patients) were pooled in the final analysis. The overall effect size favored desmoteplase over placebo in terms of reperfusion 4 to 24 hours posttreatment (OR 1.49, 95% CI [1.02, 2.19]). However, the pooled effect size did not favor either of the two groups in terms of good clinical outcome at 90 days (OR 1.16, 95% CI [0.86, 1.55]). Neither of the primary safety outcomes differed significantly between the two groups (symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage: OR 1.29, 95% CI [0.53, 3.16] and mortality within 90 days: OR 1.20, 95% CI [0.73, 1.97]). CONCLUSION: Current evidence suggests a favorable reperfusion effect for desmoteplase within 3 to 9 hours after AIS. Further large randomized trials, using a moderate dose between 90 µg/kg and 125 µg/kg, are required to translate this successful reperfusion into better clinical and quality of life outcomes for AIS patients.


Subject(s)
Brain Ischemia/drug therapy , Plasminogen Activators/therapeutic use , Stroke/drug therapy , Brain Ischemia/complications , Humans , Plasminogen Activators/adverse effects , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Stroke/complications , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...