ABSTRACT
Body Dysmorphic Disorder (BDD) is a psychiatric condition involving a preoccupation with physical appearance disproportionate to physical findings, which are often absent altogether. Previously published data has estimated its prevalence at 11.3-11.9% approximately, across various medical specialties. No recent systematic reviews strictly related to dermatology clinics and the prevalence of BDD have been published. The goal of the review was to gather a pooled prevalence of BDD in outpatient dermatology clinics around the world and further underline the importance of its recognition and appropriate treatment. Twenty-one articles tackling BDD in outpatient cosmetic and general dermatology clinics were selected. Studies were graded based on the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) and the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences software (SPSS) was used to a calculate a mean for the pooled prevalence, yielding a weighted mean prevalence of 12.5% among general dermatology patients and 25.01% among cosmetic dermatology patients. The mean prevalence of BDD among general dermatology patients fell within previously reported numbers. It was, however, markedly higher than previously reported in cosmetic dermatology patients, which we postulate could be due to dermatologists being at the forefront of non-invasive cosmetic procedures. As such, we conclude that given the high prevalence of BDD among dermatology patients, we highlight the importance of keeping a high index of suspicion of BDD among dermatologists, ways to uncover it in a clinical setting, and additional data showcasing the importance of psychiatric treatment of these patients for better outcomes, all while avoiding unnecessary interventions.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: To date, there has been a dearth of research on health literacy in the Eastern Mediterranean Region and in particular Lebanon. OBJECTIVES: This cross-sectional study assessed the levels and correlates of health literacy in Lebanese adults. METHODS: A total of 587 participants (54.5% women) were recruited from the outpatient clinics of five health facilities in Beirut. The questionnaire consisted of the Arabic version of the Functional Health literacy Scale, the Arabic short version of the European Health Literacy Survey, and questions on sociodemographic and health-related factors. Descriptive and inferential statistics were performed to assess the association of these factors with functional health literacy (FHL) and comprehensive health literacy (CHL) levels. KEY RESULTS: About 65.8% had inadequate or problematic FHL and 43.8% had inadequate or problematic CHL. Although FHL was negatively correlated with long-term illness, it was positively correlated with ability to pay and health status. CHL was positively correlated with education, income, ability to pay for treatment, health status, and FHL level, whereas it was negatively correlated with long-term illness. Binary logistic regression showed that low education, low socioeconomic status, and being a widow were predictive of inadequate FHL. Moreover, having inadequate FHL and low income increased the likelihood of having inadequate CHL. CONCLUSION: This study has identified those with risk factors for inadequate health literacy and unfavorable health outcomes. A national action plan can guide the promotion of health literacy and its embeddedness in society to instill competencies and the environment that would eliminate health inequities and sustain health in Lebanon. [HLRP: Health Literacy Research and Practice. 2021;5(4):e295-e309.] Plain Language Summary: This study examined health literacy levels and correlates in 587 Lebanese adults using two recognized screening tools. The first tool measured functional health literacy (FHL), which represents the ability of a person to acquire information on health through reading or writing. The second tool assessed comprehensive health literacy (CHL), which encompasses the ability of a person to use their social skills to acquire health information from different media and make appropriate health decisions based on this information. Close to two-thirds of the participants had inadequate or problematic FHL. More specifically, low education, low socioeconomic status, and widowhood were predictive of inadequate FHL. Nearly one-half of the participants had inadequate or problematic CHL with an increased likelihood of inadequate levels in people with low FHL and low income.
