Prolonged healing of venous leg ulcers: the role of venous reflux, ulcer characteristics and mobility.

OBJECTIVE: To assess whether a difference in venous reflux pattern, ulcer size or duration, regular medications or the daily use of walking aids can predict the healing of a chronic venous leg ulcer (VLU). METHOD: In this prospective, randomised, single-centre study, 110 consecutive patients with chronic leg ulcers were assessed. Ninety-nine patients met the inclusion criteria and a controlled, conservative 3-month treatment period was initiated, in which 90 patients were managed with standardised local treatment combined with compression therapy. In this group, 62 VLUs healed within 12 weeks and 28 were still open after 12 weeks. The study group consisted of 22 patients with non-healed ulcers and a control group (n=28), which was selected randomly from the healers. In both groups, venous reflux profiles were assessed using colour-flow duplex imaging. RESULTS: The study and control groups did not differ in smoking habits, age, gender or daily oral medications. On average, the healing wounds were 5cm² before starting controlled treatment (range 1-80cm²) and had been open for 7 months (range 2-48 months); the non-healing wounds were on average 11.2cm² (range 1-31cm²) and had been open for 26 months (range 8-106 months). Venous disease severity scores were similar for both groups (12.6 vs. 13.4). Five patients (18%) with healed ulcers regularly used walking aids, the use of which was more frequent (36%) among non-healers (p<0.001). Venous reflux profiles differed significantly between the groups, with isolated superficial reflux noted in 64% of healers, compared with 36% of non-healers. In addition, isolated deep reflux was found in 14% of the healers, compared with 41% of non-healers (p=0.0002). The rate of popliteal reflux was significantly higher in non-healers (59% versus 21%; p=0.0004). CONCLUSION: Long duration of a chronic venous ulcer may predict a poor outcome. The presence of deep venous reflux, especially in the popliteal vein, is typically found in those legs with non-healed ulcers. .

Clinical and hemodynamical findings in legs with previous surgery of the great saphenous vein: role of the small saphenous vein.

AIM: To assess the role of small saphenous vein (SSV) reflux in patients with a long history of varicose disease and previous stripping of the great saphenous vein (GSV). METHODS: Consecutive patients with a history of GSV stripping 5-19 years earlier were enrolled in this prospective clinical study. A total of 101 legs of 75 consecutive patients fulfilled the study criteria: previous stripping of GSV from ankle to groin at least 5 years earlier, no history of thromboembolism and no previous surgery of deep veins or SSV. All patients were studied clinically using standardized classifications: clinical class, clinical disability score (CDS) and venous clinical scoring system (VCSS). Colour flow duplex imaging (CFDI) was used to assess reflux in deep and superficial veins. Details of prior surgery were evaluated. RESULTS: Overall, SSV reflux was noted in 28 (28%) of the legs, recurrent GSV (rGSV) in the thigh in 41 (41%), reflux in tributaries alone in 28 (28%) and a combination of SSV and rGSV reflux in 4 (3%). Segmental deep reflux was measured in 23 (23%) of the legs; the prevalence of deep reflux was significantly higher in complicated than in uncomplicated legs (12% versus 47%; P<0.05). Deep reflux was more frequently associated with SSV reflux than with rGSV reflux (50% versus 22%; P<0.05). The prevalence of SSV with or without deep reflux increased from 17% to 50% (P<0.05) when uncomplicated (C2-3) and complicated (C4-6) legs were compared. A similar increase was not seen in the legs with rGSV (39% versus 44%; P>0.05). SSV reflux without deep reflux was observed in 25% of the legs with complicated (C4-6) disease, whereas the prevalence of SSV reflux was low (9%) in uncomplicated (C2-3) legs. VCSS was higher in the legs with SSV reflux than in those with rGSV reflux. CDS scores tended to be higher in the SSV reflux group than in the legs with rGSV reflux or tributary reflux alone. After exclusion of deep reflux, the results remained at the same level. CONCLUSION: Small saphenous vein (SSV) reflux is common in legs with recurrent varicose veins and previous stripping of the GSV. SSV reflux alone is frequent in complicated legs, and SSV reflux is typically associated with segmental deep reflux. Clinical and hemodynamical findings stress the role of SSV reflux in this selected venous population.