CD8+ T cell responses to human immunodeficiency viruses type 2 (HIV-2) and type 1 (HIV-1) gag proteins are distinguishable by magnitude and breadth but not cellular phenotype.

The mechanisms underlying the relatively slow progression of human immunodeficiency virus type 2 (HIV-2) compared with HIV-1 infection are undefined and could be a result of more effective immune responses. We used HIV-2 and HIV-1 IFN-gamma enzyme-linked immunospot assays to evaluate CD8(+) T cell responses in antiretroviral-naive HIV-2- ('HIV-2(+)') and HIV-1-infected ('HIV-1(+)') individuals. Gag-specific responses were detected in the majority of HIV-2(+) and HIV-1(+) subjects. Overlapping gag peptide analysis indicated a significantly greater magnitude and breadth of responses in the HIV-1(+) cohort, and this difference was attributable to low responses in HIV-2(+) subjects with undetectable viral load (medians 2107 and 512 spot-forming units per 10(6) PBMC, respectively, p=0.007). We investigated the phenotype of viral epitope-specific CD8(+) T cells identified with HLA-B53- and HLA-B58-peptide tetramers (8 HIV-2(+), 11 HIV-1(+) subjects). HIV-2-specific CD8(+) T cells were predominantly CD27(+) CD45RA(-), and only a minority expressed perforin. The limited breadth and low frequency of CD8(+) T cell responses to HIV-2 gag in aviremic HIV-2(+) subjects suggests that these responses reflect antigen load in plasma, as is the case in HIV-1 infection. Immune control of HIV-2 does not appear to be related to the frequency of perforin-expressing virus-specific CD8(+) T cells.

Greater CD8+ TCR heterogeneity and functional flexibility in HIV-2 compared to HIV-1 infection.

Virus-specific CD8(+) T cells are known to play an important role in the control of HIV infection. In this study we investigated whether there may be qualitative differences in the CD8(+) T cell response in HIV-1- and HIV-2-infected individuals that contribute to the relatively efficient control of the latter infection. A molecular comparison of global TCR heterogeneity showed a more oligoclonal pattern of CD8 cells in HIV-1- than HIV-2-infected patients. This was reflected in restricted and conserved TCR usage by CD8(+) T cells recognizing individual HLA-A2- and HLA-B57-restricted viral epitopes in HIV-1, with limited plasticity in their response to amino acid substitutions within these epitopes. The more diverse TCR usage observed for HIV-2-specific CD8(+) T cells was associated with an enhanced potential for CD8 expansion and IFN-gamma production on cross-recognition of variant epitopes. Our data suggest a mechanism that could account for any possible cross-protection that may be mediated by HIV-2-specific CD8(+) T cells against HIV-1 infection. Furthermore, they have implications for HIV vaccine development, demonstrating an association between a polyclonal, virus-specific CD8(+) T cell response and an enhanced capacity to tolerate substitutions within T cell epitopes.

Plasma viral load, CD4 cell percentage, HLA and survival of HIV-1, HIV-2, and dually infected Gambian patients.

OBJECTIVE: To examine baseline plasma viral loads according to the CD4 cell percentage (CD4%) in HIV-1, HIV-2 and dually infected patients (HIV-D), and to relate these measurements to survival. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 119 HIV-1, 137 HIV-2 and 81 HIV-D-infected patients attending the Medical Research Council clinic in The Gambia were recruited from 1991 according to baseline CD4%, and followed until death or the end of December 2000. HIV-1 and HIV-2 RNA levels were measured by in-house reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction assays. RESULTS: The plasma viral load, which varied inversely with CD4%, was similar in HIV-1 singly and dually infected patients, but was significantly higher in HIV-1 than in HIV-2 singly infected patients, except in those with a CD4% less than 14%. HIV-2 plasma viral load in dually infected patients did not vary significantly with CD4%, but was significantly lower than in HIV-2 singly infected patients with CD4% less than 14%. Multivariate analysis showed that only CD4% was independently associated with survival in HIV-1 and HIV-D infections; whereas both CD4% and plasma viral load were independently associated with survival in HIV-2 infections. The mortality rate of HIV-D-infected patients was not significantly different from that of HIV-1-infected patients, but was significantly higher in the absence of HLA B58. CONCLUSION: HIV-2 infection does not alter HIV-1 replication or prolong survival in dually infected patients. In a clinical setting in Africa, where many patients present with advanced disease, CD4% may be a more important predictor of prognosis than plasma viral load.