Breakthrough Cancer Pain: Preliminary Data of The Italian Oncologic Pain Multisetting Multicentric Survey (IOPS-MS).

INTRODUCTION: An ongoing national multicenter survey [Italian Oncologic Pain multiSetting Multicentric Survey (IOPS-MS)] is evaluating the characteristics of breakthrough cancer pain (BTP) in different clinical settings. Preliminary data from the first 1500 cancer patients with BTP enrolled in this study are presented here. METHODS: Thirty-two clinical centers are involved in the survey. A diagnosis of BTP was performed by a standard algorithm. Epidemiological data, Karnofsky index, stage of disease, presence and sites of metastases, ongoing oncologic treatment, and characteristics of background pain and BTP and their treatments were recorded. Background pain and BTP intensity were measured. Patients were also questioned about BTP predictability, BTP onset (≤10 or >10 min), BTP duration, background and BTP medications and their doses, time to meaningful pain relief after BTP medication, and satisfaction with BTP medication. The occurrence of adverse reactions was also assessed, as well as mucosal toxicity. RESULTS: Background pain was well controlled with opioid treatment (numerical rating scale 3.0 ± 1.1). Patients reported 2.5 ± 1.6 BTP episodes/day with a mean intensity of 7.5 ± 1.4 and duration of 43 ± 40 min; 977 patients (65.1%) reported non-predictable BTP, and 1076 patients (71.7%) reported a rapid onset of BTP (≤10 min). Higher patient satisfaction was reported by patients treated with fast onset opioids. CONCLUSIONS: These preliminary data underline that the standard algorithm used is a valid tool for a proper diagnosis of BTP in cancer patients. Moreover, rapid relief of pain is crucial for patients' satisfaction. The final IOPS-MS data are necessary to understand relationships between BTP characteristics and other clinical variables in oncologic patients. FUNDING: Molteni Farmaceutici, Italy.

Safety and efficacy of citrate anti-coagulation continuous renal replacement therapies in post-cardiac surgery patients with liver dysfunction.

The study's aim was to examine safety and efficiency of citrate anticoagulated continuous renal replacement therapies (CRRT) in cardiac surgery patients with acute kidney injury and associated liver dysfunction. The study was conducted on critical ICU patients, hospitalized after cardiac surgery, who developed renal and liver acute failures due to low-flow syndrome. CRRT in continuous veno-venous hemodiafiltration with regional citrate anticoagulation (RCA) was prescribed to address renal failure and avoid bleeding-risk. Patient Ca(++) was measured to monitor RCA safety, while thromboelastography (TEG) and circuit Ca(++) were used to verify efficacy. CRRT effectiveness was evaluated through creatinine and urea levels, while liver function was monitored through bilirubin, aspartate aminotransferase, glutamic oxaloacetic transaminase (AST GOT) and gamma glutamyl transferase (GT) levels. The study did not require ethical approval. Hepatic and renal failures were confirmed by baseline levels (total bilirubin=3.1 ± 3.37 mg/dL, AST GOT=153 ± 147 U/L and gamma GT=93.3 ± 86 IU/L, creatinine=1.97 ± 0.88 and blood urea nitrogen [BUN] 98.13 ± 71.34) assessed in 15 patients. During treatment, Ca(++) (patient and circuit) remained stable and within range for the whole therapy thanks to low citrate dose (2.8 ± 0.3 mmol/L of blood), while hepatic markers did not show any significant changes the therapy, although treatment with citrate is contraindicated in patients with hepatic failure. RCA quality was confirmed by TEG values, which showed an anticoagulated circuit with no effects on patients. These results involved a high filter lifespan (49.76 ± 22.10 h) and with an effective creatinine and BUN clearance. No episodes of citrate intoxication were reported (total/ionized calcium ratio remained stable and physiologic). RCA during CRRT with dilute solutions proved both effective and safe, even in patients with acute liver failure.

One-year follow-up of patients with long-lasting post-herpetic neuralgia.

BACKGROUND: Recent information on epidemiology and management of post-herpetic neuralgia (PHN), a painful complication of zoster, is scarce. METHODS: This study was conducted at the Pain Clinic of the Policlinico Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy, on eighty-five immunocompetent patients with a clinical diagnosis of PHN. At enrollment (time 0, T0), the patients were interviewed by physicians to obtain demographic data and information about their zoster clinical history and underwent a blood test for VZV-DNA research. DN4 and SF-12 questionnaires were used to assess the neuropathic nature of pain and the overall health status, respectively. A one-year follow-up was planned for enrolled cases, who were visited at regular intervals of at least 3 months. RESULTS: At T0 all the patients were at least 6 months from the episode of acute zoster and still presented with intense pain (mean VAS =6.7; mean DN4 = 5.7). Using antivirals within 72 hours from the rash onset was associated to a significant reduction of pain at T0 (p = 0.006 vs untreated patients). Only 2.6% of patients treated with antivirals during acute zoster but 18.6% of the untreated ones presented with neuropathic pain at T12 (p =0.007), even though the two groups were similar at T0. VZV-DNA was found in 5 out of the 50 available blood samples. At the last follow-up visit, PCS and MCS scores of the PHN patients were found to be recovered over those of the historical age-matched healthy controls. Undesirable side effects of analgesic therapies were observed in 15.3 to 28.8% of the patients. CONCLUSIONS: Patients who six months after acute zoster still have significant neuropathic pain, have a high probability of suffering from chronic pain in the subsequent months/years. The initial antiviral treatment has a significant impact on the pain. Current strategies of analgesic therapy are effective to achieve relief of pain in PHN patients, but they are burdened with heavy and undesirable side effects.

Breakthrough pain in patients with controlled or uncontrolled basal pain: an observational study.

BACKGROUND: Breakthrough pain (BTP) is traditionally defined as a pain exacerbation in patients with chronic controlled pain. However, this definition has recently been challenged. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the prevalence of unsatisfactory control in patients with chronic cancer pain, and investigate the frequency and intensity of BTP episodes. METHODS: A total of 665 patients with chronic cancer pain attending 21 pain therapy units in Italy were evaluated for baseline pain intensity and number of BTP episodes over a 30-day period. All patients started, continued or modified treatment for BTP at enrollment, according to medical judgment. RESULTS: The number of BTP events was higher in patients with uncontrolled baseline pain, although the intensity and duration of episodes were similar. In patients with uncontrolled baseline pain, the number of events decreased with time and reached values comparable with those reported in patients with controlled pain. Both the intensity of the pain and the duration of the BTP events exhibited similar values in the two groups at all time points, following increased monitoring and the prescription of analgesic medication. CONCLUSION: Patients with uncontrolled baseline pain experienced BTP flares with higher frequency, but similar intensity and duration with respect to patients with controlled pain at baseline. Notably, a close follow-up and adequate management of the BTP episodes led to an improvement of BTP in the observed patients.

Long-term efficacy of OROS® hydromorphone combined with pregabalin for chronic non-cancer neuropathic pain.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Treatment for chronic non-cancer neuropathic pain can be complicated by side effects and drug interactions. Combining opioid analgesics and calcium channel modulators may overcome these and improve efficacy. The objective of the present study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of OROS® hydromorphone combined with pregabalin in patients with chronic non-cancer neuropathic pain. METHODS: This retrospective observational study was conducted on clinical records from patients aged ≥18 years with chronic non-cancer neuropathic [>4 on the Douleur Neuropathique en 4 questions (DN4) scale] pain of ≥6 months duration, with severe intensity [>4 on the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS); range 0-10], who attended all visits and had ≥12 months of follow-up at the Tor Vergata University Polyclinic Hospital, from November 2008 to February 2011. Patients received an oral combination of OROS® hydromorphone and pregabalin. Pain was evaluated at each visit (months 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12) using the NRS and DN4 scale; Patients' Global Impression of Change (PGIC) was administered at months 1, 6, and 12. Dosage and side effects were recorded at each visit. RESULTS: Of 1,292 patients (32 % men, mean ± SD age 67.6 ± 11.9 years), 1,126 attended all visits. Seventeen percent (n = 224) had purely neuropathic pain. Initial mean dosage was 6.06 ± 2.00 mg/day for OROS® hydromorphone, 113.02 ± 21.94 mg/day for pregabalin. Dosages increased up to month 6, and returned to near initial dosages at month 12 (range 4-120 mg/day for OROS® hydromorphone; 75-600 mg/day for pregabalin). NRS pain scores (mean ± standard deviation) were 7.25 ± 1.34 at baseline and 1.85 ± 1.36 at 12 months (p < 0.0001); DN4 scores were 6.19 ± 1.65 at baseline, reduced to 1.84 ± 1.25 at 12 months (p < 0.0001), reductions of 74.4 and 70.2 %, respectively. More than 90 % of patients had a ≥50 % score reduction on both scales after 12 months. The PGIC scale showed that >75 % of patients felt improvement at 1 month, increasing to 91 % and 93 % at 6 and 12 months. The incidence of side effects was similar between elderly (aged >65 years) and younger subjects; there were no cases of addiction. CONCLUSIONS: The OROS® hydromorphone and pregabalin combination was efficacious for chronic non-cancer neuropathic pain and well tolerated, providing significant pain reduction without the risk of addiction and with a good tolerability profile, regardless of age.

Beyond the traditional definition of breakthrough pain: an observational study.

INTRODUCTION: Breakthrough pain (BTP) is traditionally defined as a transitory pain flare in opioid-treated patients with chronic background pain. This definition has, however, been challenged in recent years. This study aimed to analyze BTP prevalence in different pain conditions. METHODS: This was a prospective, non-interventional, observational study conducted from June to September 2011 in two Italian pain treatment reference centres. Consecutive patients aged >18 years with oncological or non-oncological pain were eligible for this study; background pain was acute/ subacute (<3 months) or chronic (>3 months). The characteristics of pain were evaluated by means of a structured interview by physicians, and patients were asked to complete a dedicated clinical study form. The following outcomes were assessed: chronic pain duration (in patients with chronic pain), BTP prevalence, and number and severity of daily BTP episodes. All outcomes were assessed in four populations of patients with: (a) chronic oncological pain; (b) chronic non-oncological pain; (c) non-chronic oncological pain; (d) non-chronic non-oncological pain. The correlation between BTP and gender was also investigated. RESULTS: Of 1,270 patients with chronic pain, 1,086 had non-oncological pain (85.5%). Most patients (68.6%) with non-oncological pain were female (P = 0.001). Pain duration was significantly longer in non-oncological pain versus oncological pain groups (P = 0.002). BTP prevalence was lower in non-oncological patients (P < 0.001). No differences were reported in terms of number and severity of daily BTP episodes. BTP was more frequent in females with non-oncological pain (P = 0.04). Females had a significantly higher pain severity (P = 0.02) than males. CONCLUSION: BTP is frequently reported in patients who do not have BTP according to the traditional definition. BTP frequency and severity is similar in oncological and non-oncological pain.

Palmitoylethanolamide in the treatment of chronic pain caused by different etiopathogenesis.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy and safety of palmitoylethanolamide (PEA), an endogenous fatty acid amide belonging to the N-acylethanolamines family, in reducing pain severity in patients with pain associated to different pathological conditions. METHODS: This was an observational study conducted on 610 patients who were unable to effectively control chronic pain with standard therapies. PEA (600 mg) was administered twice daily for 3 weeks followed by single daily dosing for 4 weeks, in addition to standard analgesic therapies or as single therapy. The primary outcome measure was the mean score pain severity evaluated by the numeric rating scale. Safety was also evaluated. RESULTS: PEA treatment significantly decreased the mean score pain intensity evaluated in all patients who completed the study. The PEA effect was independent of the pain associated pathological condition. PEA-induced decrease of pain intensity was present also in patients without concomitant analgesic therapy. Importantly, PEA showed no adverse effects. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, PEA was effective and safe in the management of chronic pain in different pathological conditions.

Breakthrough pain in patients referred to pain clinics: the Italian pain network retrospective study.

INTRODUCTION: Despite breakthrough pain (BTP) being one of the most severe forms of pain, there are no definitive data on its prevalence. METHODS: The authors performed a retrospective survey of the prevalence of BTP in consecutive patients in four Italian pain clinics, subsequent to application of an Italian law mandating detailed clinical records on pain characteristics, treatment, and results. Mean pain intensity was assessed with a numerical rating scale from 0 to 10. RESULTS: The authors analyzed records of 1,401 patients (58% women, 33.1% patients with cancer). Transient episodes of severe pain or BTP were referred by 790 patients (56.4%), including 58.2% of the men (342 of 588) and 55.1% of the women (448 of 813). Among the 464 patients with cancer, 70.3% reported daily exacerbation of pain. The mean BTP intensity was 8.31 ± 1.58 and 31.1% of patients reported experiencing three episodes per day. CONCLUSION: Despite some limitations of the study, the authors show that transient episodes of severe pain or BTP are significantly present both in cancer and other diseases, and that many patients are not yet receiving appropriate opioid therapy. The authors need validated tools at international level for the diagnosis and treatment of BTP in patients with cancer and for transitory and patients with severe non-cancer pain. A survey at national level is needed to estimate the prevalence of BTP in different settings, to plan specific medical education.

Management of opioid-induced constipation in cancer patients: focus on methylnaltrexone.

Opioids are one of the most widely used therapies for the palliative treatment of cancer pain; however, despite their proven analgesic efficacy, they are associated with several adverse effects. Associated with psychological distress and multiple concomitant clinical concerns, constipation is the most commonly occurring adverse effect of chronic opioid therapy in cancer patients. Whilst prophylaxis remains the first-line management option, methylnaltrexone is a recommended treatment option for opioid-related constipation if administration of laxatives is ineffective. Due to its inability to cross the blood-brain barrier, methylnaltrexone exerts a peripheral inhibition of opioid-related effects without influencing the opioid-induced central effects; as a result, the analgesic effect of opioids is unaffected. Moreover, multiple clinical trials, albeit not always conducted specifically in cancer patients, have demonstrated that up to 4 months' treatment with either intravenous or subcutaneous methylnaltrexone provides effective relief from opioid-related constipation and is well tolerated. Preliminary evidence indicates that the addition of methylnaltrexone to standard care for opioid-related constipation may also be advantageous from a pharmacoeconomic perspective. In addition, preliminary data suggest that methylnaltrexone could be associated with some further clinical benefits other than the treatment of opioid-related constipation, such as the improvement of gastric emptying, the relief of nausea/vomiting, and the reduction of the risk of regurgitation and pulmonary aspiration. This narrative review examines the most recent evidence and evaluates the current role of methylnaltrexone in the management of opioid-related constipation, and its potential efficacy in cancer patients. The pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, efficacy and tolerability of methylnaltrexone are discussed.

Adherence and long-term effect of oxycodone/paracetamol in chronic noncancer pain: a retrospective study.

INTRODUCTION: Long-term administration of opiates in patients with chronic noncancer pain (CNCP) is subject to debate due to insufficient clinical evidence to support efficacy and tolerability. METHODS: This retrospective analysis used hospital records to investigate the effects of low doses of the combination of oxycodone/paracetamol on CNCP in an outpatient clinic setting to verify adherence to therapy and long-term efficacy. All patients receiving therapy for CNCP were examined between May and September 2010 and information was collected on medication, duration of therapy, and static and dynamic pain measured using numeric rating scales (NRS) from relevant charts. RESULTS: Two hundred and thirty-one patients (157 men, 68%) with a mean (± SD) age of 66.4±15.5 years were analyzed. Pain indexes at baseline revealed a mean (± SD) static NRS (sNRS) of 3.5±1.77 and a mean dynamic NRS (dNRS) of 7.24±1.33. At last follow-up, mean (± SD) pain reductions versus baseline were 1.58±1.42 for sNRS and 3.04±1.43 for dNRS (P<0.0001 for both). Regarding the duration of therapy, 54 patients (23.4%) were treated for <4 months, and 177 patients (76.6%) for 4 months up to 23 months. Pain reduction was significant in all groups (P<0.0001) but was greatest in patients who had been receiving therapy for ≥4 months. Improvements in pain relief were not associated with an increase in daily dose, which remained stable or decreased slightly over time. DISCUSSION: The results of this study support the hypothesis that an opiate-based combination at low doses improves tolerability and adherence and results in patients obtaining long-term efficacy. Larger studies of the use of opiates in this setting and clinical monitoring on the regional and national level may convince clinicians to view opiates as efficacious analgesics and not as dangerous substances of abuse.

Oxycodone/paracetamol: a low-dose synergic combination useful in different types of pain.

The combination of two analgesic agents offers several advantages in the treatment of chronic pain. Paracetamol (acetaminophen) has central analgesic activity without a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID)-like or opioid-like effect. Oxycodone is a semisynthetic opioid agonist. The oral fixed-dose combination of oxycodone and paracetamol immediate-release formulation has a synergistic mechanism of action that is useful for moderate-to-severe pain and for nonresponders to NSAIDs or paracetamol alone. This fixed-dose combination offers several advantages: lower individual drug doses can be used because of their synergistic mechanisms of action, its opioid-sparing effect and it has a good efficacy and tolerability profile. Efficacy and safety of this fixed-dose combination were assessed in a wide range of clinical settings: in patients with osteoarthritis or chronic musculoskeletal pain, including when complicated by a neuropathic component; for chronic pain in elderly patients; cancer-related pain; postoperative pain; and for neuropathic pain, in the latter case usually given in combination with an NSAID or other drugs. The large variety of indications for which this fixed-dose combination may be useful can be attributed to the pharmacological synergy between oxycodone and paracetamol and because lower individual drug dosages can be used, suggesting that this should be a first-line agent for the treatment of chronic moderate-to-severe pain.

Idiopathic breakthrough pain: a new hypothesis.

Breakthrough pain (BTP) in treated patients with chronic pain states is neither well defined nor well understood. BTP is generally defined as a transient exacerbation of pain experienced by a patient with relatively stable and adequately controlled baseline pain. It is usually categorized as spontaneous, with no known cause, or incident, when initiated by voluntary or involuntary movements, or therapeutic procedures. Since pain is related to survival, it possibly cannot be completely and permanently controlled. It is hypothesized that glia are at least partially responsible for inducing pain spikes by attempting to reactivate unresponsive neurons. Therefore, compounds that modulate microglia may offer potential alternative therapeutic options in the control of idiopathic BTP.

Transdermal buprenorphine in non-oncological moderate-to-severe chronic pain.

BACKGROUND: Musculoskeletal pathologies are among the most frequent causes of long-term non-oncological severe pain and consequent physical impairment. Aims of pharmacological and physical therapy are to reduce pain, promote functional recovery and improve overall quality of life. Pharmacological therapy may include the use of opioids. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of transdermal buprenorphine (TDS) in the long-term management of non-oncological, chronic, moderate-to-severe musculoskeletal pain. STUDY DESIGN: An open-label, prospective, single-centre, 6-month study. SETTING: A 'real world' outpatient setting. PATIENTS: Adult patients with chronic moderate-to-severe musculoskeletal pain were enrolled consecutively. INTERVENTION: Patients initially received buprenorphine TDS 11.7 microg/h (one-third of 35 microg/h patch) every 72 hours. If required, patients could be up-titrated to 17.5 microg/h (one-half of 35 microg/h patch), 23.4 microg/h (two-thirds of 35 microg/h patch) or 35 microg/h. Concomitant antiemetics were allowed. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary endpoint was percentage mean reduction in static and dynamic pain visual analogue scale (VAS) scores at study end (10 being worst pain, 0 being no pain). Quality of life and tolerability were also assessed. RESULTS: We enrolled 146 patients aged 41-94 years; their baseline mean +/- SD static and dynamic pain VAS scores were 6.87 +/- 1.89 and 7.70 +/- 1.74, respectively. Buprenorphine TDS initial dosages were 11.7 microg/h (n = 139), 17.5 microg/h (n = 4), 23.4 microg/h (n = 1) and 35 microg/h (n = 2). At 6 months, 89 patients were under treatment; 11% (n = 10) were receiving 11.7 microg/h, 30% (n = 27) 17.5 microg/h, 6% (n = 5) 23.4 microg/h and 53% (n = 47) 35 microg/h. Patients achieved a nonsignificant reduction in pain at rest and in movement; mean +/- SD static and dynamic pain VAS scores decreased to 1.56 +/- 2.05 and 3.54 +/- 2.02, respectively. The quality of life improved as shown by significant (p < 0.01) increases from baseline in all items relating to physical and mental health on the Short-Form 36 health survey. Patients experienced recovery of daily and social activities according to the significant (p < 0.01) increase in Karnofsky Performance Status sub-item scores. Twenty-three patients discontinued treatment because of adverse events, which were mainly gastrointestinal or CNS-related. CONCLUSIONS: Low-dose buprenorphine TDS had good analgesic efficacy, and quality of life improved as early as 1 month after treatment initiation. Our results suggest that buprenorphine TDS is a well tolerated long-term analgesic for patients experiencing chronic musculoskeletal pain of moderate-to-severe intensity.

Effects of opioid rotation in chronic pain patients: ORTIBARN study.

BACKGROUND: Opioid rotation is currently the subject of considerable debate for two reasons: firstly as a strategy for pain treatment, and secondly because of the difficulty in determining equianalgesic doses. Switching from one slow-release (SR) opioid analgesic to another raises a number of critical issues, and there are no widespread studies that support a standard protocol. Initiation of opioid therapy must consider gradual dose titration of the drug until the minimum effective and maximum tolerated dosage for each patient is found. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the effects of SR opioid rotation after a stabilization period with normal-release (NR) morphine ('start therapy') in patients with cancer or non-cancer pain not controlled with their current SR opioid. METHODS: This is a multicentre, open-label, prospective study. A total of 326 consecutive patients were enrolled who were affected by chronic cancer or non-cancer pain that was not controlled by an SR opioid administered as either monotherapy or in combination with other analgesic drugs. Following start therapy with oral NR morphine at a dosage of 5 mg or 10 mg every 4 hours, rotation to an SR opioid of a different type from that previously administered was carried out. RESULTS: After about 3 days of start therapy with NR morphine, rotation to an SR opioid allowed a significant decrease of both baseline pain and daily episodes of breakthrough pain. No significant difference was detected between dosages and type of opioid administered, both prior to and after the start therapy period with NR morphine. CONCLUSIONS: Rotation to another opioid preceded by a brief period of opioid receptor resetting by start therapy with NR morphine allows a good level of pain control and avoids rotation to inappropriate opioid dosages or combinations analgesics.

Adequacy assessment of oxycodone/paracetamol (acetaminophen) in multimodal chronic pain : a prospective observational study.

BACKGROUND: Multimodal pain is comprised of nociceptive/inflammatory and neuropathic components. Pharmacological pain therapies from different classes provide pain relief using different mechanistic actions; often a combination of such therapies provides more effective pain relief than monotherapy. To assess whether pain management is adequate requires a comprehensive pain scoring system. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the adequacy of a low-dose combination of oxycodone and paracetamol (acetaminophen) in patients with multimodal, chronic, non-malignant pain using the Pain Management Index (PMI). METHODS: During this prospective, observational study, consecutive patients were classified according to the presence of prevalent osteoarticular pain (group A, n = 78) or prevalent neuropathic pain (group B, n = 72). Existing pain-relief medications were discontinued and both groups received oxycodone 5 mg and paracetamol 325 mg up to 8 hourly for a planned duration of >/= 6 weeks. Patients in group B who were receiving gabapentin continued this treatment up to a maximum daily dosage of 2400 mg during the observation period. Pain intensity was evaluated using a visual analogue scale (VAS from 0 to 10). Functional limitation for patients in group A was evaluated using the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC). The intensities of dynamic allodynia and hyperalgesia in patients in group B were evaluated by a VAS. Results from the WOMAC, dynamic allodynia, and hyperalgesia assessments were evaluated using the PMI. RESULTS: In group A, 64.3% of patients showed improvements in pain symptoms after 15 days of treatment in the WOMAC categories of "pain preventing sleep" and "walks with aid". The PMI showed that the oxycodone/paracetamol therapy was adequate in patients with osteoarticular pain. In group B, 83.3% of patients reported improvement in the category of "pain preventing sleep", and all patients rated the remaining four categories ("spontaneous pain", "burning pain", "painful paresthesia", and "pinprick") as either stable or improved after 15 days of treatment. Using the PMI, hyperalgesia resolved with oxycodone/paracetamol therapy. 37.1% and 58.3% of patients did not complete the study in group A and B, respectively. CONCLUSION: The PMI was an effective tool for assessment of pain management efficacy. Oxycodone/paracetamol improved pain symptoms in the majority of compliant patients. In patients with neuropathic pain, rescue therapy with oxycodone/paracetamol showed a lesser, but significant, improvement of pain symptoms.

Controlled-release oxycodone and pregabalin in the treatment of neuropathic pain: results of a multicenter Italian study.

AIMS: The aim of our study was to compare the efficacy, safety, and quality of life of combination therapy with controlled-release (CR) oxycodone plus pregabalin versus monotherapy with either CR oxycodone or pregabalin in patients with neuropathic pain. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with moderate to severe neuropathic pain, despite the use of various pharmacologic treatments prior to study entry, were enrolled (n = 409) and treated with CR oxycodone plus pregabalin (n = 169), CR oxycodone (n = 106), and pregabalin (n = 134). Pain intensity was rated on an 11-point numerical rating scale (NRS). RESULTS: The combination of CR oxycodone plus pregabalin and CR oxycodone monotherapy were both more effective for alleviating neuropathic pain than pregabalin monotherapy (reduction in NRS value: 80, 76, and 46%, respectively; p

A prospective comparison of continuous wound infiltration with ropivacaine versus single-injection paravertebral block after modified radical mastectomy.

BACKGROUND: The efficacy of continuous wound infiltration with local anesthetic has not been compared with that of thoracic paravertebral block (PVB) after breast surgery. In this study, we evaluated the analgesic efficacy and morphine consumption of the two techniques after mastectomy. METHODS: Forty-eight patients undergoing modified radical mastectomy with axillary dissection were randomly assigned to either a preoperative PVB with 20 mL of ropivacaine 0.5% (group PVB) or a continuous ropivacaine 0.5% infusion (CRI) at a 2 mL/h rate for each of two multilumen catheters placed subcutaneously at the end of the procedure (group CRI). The catheters were left in place for 24 h postoperatively. A standardized general anesthetic was administered to all patients. Postoperative morphine consumption, pain scores and painful restricted movement of the shoulder for 24 h postoperatively as well as incidence of adverse events, including postoperative nausea and vomiting, were recorded. RESULTS: Morphine consumption was similar between groups (PVB: 42.6 +/- 11 vs CRI: 38.7 +/- 11 mg in 24 h, P = 0.225). Absolute pain scores were low in both groups. Four hours after surgery, group PVB showed a significant reduction in postoperative pain (PVB: 0 [0-10] vs CRI: 0 [0-30], P = 0.002) and reduced painful restricted movement (P = 0.004), whereas the CRI group had lower pain scores (PVB: 10 [0-30] vs CRI: 0 [0-20], P = 0.034) and painful restricted movement (P = 0.043) 16 and 24 h (PVB: 10 [0-30] vs CRI: 0 [0-30], P = 0.012) after surgery. Postoperative nausea and vomiting was significantly more frequent in the CRI group (P = 0.017). CONCLUSIONS: Continuous wound infiltration of local anesthetics is an effective alternative to paravertebral analgesia after mastectomy with axillary dissection.

Efficacy of continuous femoral nerve block with stimulating catheters versus nonstimulating catheters for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: This prospective randomized controlled trial investigated the clinical efficacy of stimulating catheters for continuous femoral nerve block in patients who underwent anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. METHODS: Seventy patients were randomized to either a stimulating catheter (SC, n = 35) or a nonstimulating catheter (NSC, n = 35) for femoral nerve block using 25 mL ropivacaine 7.5 mg/mL and clonidine 50 microg injected through the catheter. A single-injection sciatic block was also given to ensure surgical anesthesia. The time to loss of sensation to cold and pinprick of the femoral nerve was registered as the onset time. Data were registered intra- and postoperatively regarding pain scores, adverse effects, and need for supplemental anesthesia and analgesia other than a continuous postoperative infusion of ropivacaine 2 mg/mL through the continuous femoral nerve catheter set at 7 mL/h. RESULTS: Onset time was faster in the SC group (SC: 6.4 +/- 2.5, NSC: 8.3 +/- 2.9 min, P = .006). Visual analog scale pain scores were similar in both groups. The number of patient-controlled regional analgesia boluses (SC: 14.6 +/- 12.6, NSC: 23.2 +/- 13.6 mg ropivacaine 2 mg/mL, P = .008) as well as intravenous rescue ketorolac (SC: 34.3 +/- 35.7, NSC: 54 +/- 39.7 mg, P = .033) administered were higher in the NSC group. CONCLUSION: Although the use of a stimulating catheter was associated with faster onset time for the femoral nerve block and lower additional analgesics postoperatively, the clinical superiority (analgesia; lateral femoral cutaneous, and obturator nerve block) of stimulating catheters was not evident in this clinical setting.

A novel mutation of varicella-zoster virus associated to fatal hepatitis.

BACKGROUND: Lethal varicella in immunocompetent hosts is rare and its pathogenesis is largely unknown. The discovery of glycoprotein E (gE) mutants showing attributes consistent with increased virulence in vitro and in animal models, provided a possible molecular mechanism underlying a more aggressive virus infection. However, these mutants have never been associated with unusually severe clinical cases. OBJECTIVES: To varicella-zoster virus (VZV) mutations that correlate with increased virulence. RESULTS: We report a case of fatal hepatitis caused by a VZV bearing a novel mutation on the 3B3 monoclonal antibody epitope of gE in an immunocompetent host. CONCLUSIONS: This report describes a mutant VZV responsible for an aggressive clinical course in an immunocompetent host. Linking these severe clinical presentations of VZV infection to virus mutations might provide insights into the underlying pathogenic mechanisms.

Awake nonresectional lung volume reduction surgery.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the feasibility, safety, and early results of awake lung volume reduction surgery (LVRS) performed under thoracic epidural anesthesia by a new nonresectional technique. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: So far, resectional LVRS under general anesthesia and one-lung ventilation is the more frequently used technique, but procedure-related morbidity has been considerable. METHODS: The study cohort included 12 patients undergoing unilateral awake LVRS. Evaluated parameters included technical feasibility and anesthesia satisfaction scored into 4 grades (from 1 = poor to 4 = excellent), global operating room time, and arterial carbon dioxide tension (PaCO2). In addition, 6-month changes in outcome measures, including forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1), residual volume (RV), 6-minute walking test (SMWT), and dyspnea index were recorded. Perioperative and 6-month results were comparable with those of a control group undergoing unilateral resectional LVRS. RESULTS: Technical feasibility was excellent to satisfactory in 11 patients. One patient required conversion to one-lung ventilation. Differences between the awake and control group included global operating room time (90 +/- 17 minutes versus 145 +/- 19 minutes, P < 0.00001); PaCO2 24 hours after surgery (45 +/- 6 mm Hg versus 49 +/- 6 mm Hg, P = 0.02); and hospital stay (7.8 +/- 5 days versus 11.7 +/- 4 days, P = 0.02). Significant (P < 0.002) improvements occurred at 6 months in FEV1 (0.31 +/- 0.17 L), RV (-1.41 +/- 0.7 L), SMWT (73 +/- 25 m), and dyspnea index (-1.3 +/- 0.5) and were comparable with those of the control group. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, awake nonresectional LVRS proved feasible and safe. This new modality was associated with a faster recovery and satisfactory 6-month outcome, which did not differ from that of resectional LVRS.