Improving the management of open tibia fractures, Malawi.

Objective: To assess the impact of an open fracture intervention bundle on clinical management and patient outcomes of adults in Malawi with open tibia fractures. Methods: We conducted a before-and-after implementation study in Malawi in 2021 and 2022 to assess the impact of an open fracture intervention bundle, including a national education course for clinical officers and management guidelines for open fractures. We recruited 287 patients with open tibia fractures. The primary outcome was a before-and-after comparison of the self-reported short musculoskeletal function assessment score, a measure of patient function. Secondary outcomes included clinical management; and clinician knowledge and implementation evaluation outcomes of 57 health-care providers attending the course. We also constructed multilevel regression models to investigate associations between clinical knowledge, patient function, and implementation evaluation before and after the intervention. Findings: The median patient function score at 1 year was 6.8 (interquartile range, IQR: 1.5 to 14.5) before intervention and 8.4 (IQR: 3.8 to 23.2) after intervention. Compared with baseline scores, we found clinicians' open fracture knowledge scores improved 1 year after the intervention was implemented (mean posterior difference: 1.6, 95% highest density interval: 0.9 to 2.4). However, we found no difference in most aspects of clinicians' open fracture management practice. Conclusion: Despite possible improvement in clinician knowledge and positive evaluation of the intervention implementation, our study showed that there was no overall improvement in clinical management, and weak evidence of worsening patient function 1 year after injury, after implementation of the open fracture intervention bundle.

An Assessment of Open Fracture Management in Hospitals in Malawi Before and Immediately After Implementing Open Fracture Guidelines.

Background: Open fractures, a common consequence of road traffic collisions, are associated with a high risk of complications. The introduction of standard guidelines has been shown to improve patient care and reduce the risk of complications in several countries. In September 2021, the Malawi Orthopaedic Association/Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthesefragen Alliance (MOA/AOA) guidelines and standards for open fracture management were introduced in Malawi. This study aimed to assess the management of open fractures in hospitals in Malawi, before and after implementing a training course on the MOA/AOA open fracture guidelines. Methods: This was a descriptive and quantitative, before-and-after study that reviewed the medical files of patients with open fractures at Zomba Central Hospital and Mulanje, Salima, and Mangochi district hospitals over two 3-month periods. Variables included initial assessment; antibiotic prophylaxis; place of debridement; type of anesthesia; treatment of the open fracture in the emergency department, operating room, and wards; and short-term complications requiring hospital treatment. Results: A total of 88 open-fracture case files were reviewed; 43 were prior and 45 were subsequent to the implementation of the open fracture guidelines. The overall median patient age was 36 years (interquartile range, 27 to 45 years), and 91% (80) were male. Limb neurovascular status assessment and documentation improved from 26% (11) of the patients before the guidelines to 62% (28) afterward (p = 0.0002). The percentage who underwent debridement in the operating room significantly increased from 19% (8) to 69% (31) (p = 0.01). The percentage who underwent debridement under general or spinal anesthesia significantly increased from 5% (2) to 38% (17) and from 12% (5) to 29% (13), respectively (p= 0.001). The wound infection rate decreased from 21% to 11%, but this was not significant, and there was no change in the overall complication rate (p = 0.152). Conclusions: This study suggests that training on the MOA/AOA open fracture management guidelines followed by their implementation can lead to at least temporary improvement in the management of open fractures. Nevertheless, additional studies need to be performed to understand the effect on long-term patient outcomes. Levels of Evidence: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Functional outcomes and quality of life at 1-year follow-up after an open tibia fracture in Malawi: a multicentre, prospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Injuries are a major cause of disability globally and injury incidence is rapidly increasing, largely due to road traffic injuries in low-income and middle-income countries. Current estimates of the scale and consequences of disability from injury are largely based on modelling studies, with a scarcity of empirical evidence from severe injuries in low-income countries. We aimed to better understand the outcomes for individuals with open tibia fractures in Malawi. METHODS: In this multicentre, prospective cohort study, adults (aged ≥18 years) with open tibia fractures were systematically recruited at six hospitals in Malawi (two tertiary hospitals and four district hospitals). Follow-up lasted at least 1 year, during which in-person follow-up reviews were done at 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year post-injury. The primary outcome was function at 1 year post-injury, measured by the Short Musculoskeletal Functional Assessment (SMFA) score. Secondary outcomes included quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs; as determined via the European Quality of Life 5-Dimensions 3-Levels [EQ-5D-3L] survey) and fracture-related infection at 1 year post-injury. Multilevel regression models investigated associations between SMFA score, EQ-5D-3L, baseline factors, and orthopaedic management. FINDINGS: Between Feb 12, 2021, and March 14, 2022, 287 participants were enrolled (median age 34 years [IQR 25-44]; 84% male). The most common mode of injury was road traffic injuries (194 [68%] of 287). Overall, 268 (93%) participants had debridement; of the 63 participants who were debrided in district hospitals, 47 (75%) had the procedure under local or no anaesthesia. Following substantial declines by 6 weeks after injury, function and quality of life had not recovered by 1 year post-injury for participants with Gustilo grade I-II fractures (posterior mean SMFA at 1 year: 10·5, 95% highest density interval [HDI]: 9·5-11·6; QALYs: 0·73, 95% HDI: 0·66-0·80) nor Gustilo grade III fractures (posterior mean SMFA at 1 year: 14·9, 95% HDI: 13·4-16·6; QALYs: 0·67, 95% HDI: 0·59-0·75). For all fracture grades, intramedullary nailing substantially improved function and quality of life at 1 year post-injury. Delayed definitive fixation after 5 days had 5-times greater odds of infection compared with early management within 2 days (adjusted odds ratio: 5·1, 95% CI 1·8-16·1; p=0·02). INTERPRETATION: Adults with open tibia fractures in Malawi have poor function and quality of life in the 1 year following injury. Centralised orthopaedic surgical management, including early definitive fixation and intramedullary nailing for more severe injuries, might improve outcomes. FUNDING: Wellcome Trust. TRANSLATION: For the Chichewa translation of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.

Using a consensus meeting to enhance fracture care education in low income countries.

BACKGROUND: A key strategy to building surgical capacity in low income countries involves training care providers, particularly in the interventions highlighted by the Lancet Commission for Global Surgery, including the management of open fractures. This is a common injury, especially in areas with a high incidence of road traffic incidents. The aim of this study was to use a nominal group consensus method to design a course on open fracture management for clinical officers in Malawi. METHODS: The nominal group meeting was held over two days, including clinical officers and surgeons from Malawi and the UK with various levels of expertise in the fields of global surgery, orthopaedics and education. The group was posed with questions on course content, delivery and evaluation. Each participant was encouraged to suggest an answer and the advantages and disadvantages of each suggestion were discussed before voting through an anonymous online platform. Voting included use of a Likert scale or ranking available options. Ethical approval for this process was obtained from the College of Medicine Research and Ethics Committee Malawi and the Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine. RESULTS: All suggested course topics received an average score of greater than 8 out of 10 on a Likert scale and were included in the final programme. Videos was the highest ranking option as a method for delivering pre-course material. The highest ranking methods for each course topic included lectures, videos and practicals. When asked what practical skill should be tested at the end of the course, the highest ranking option was "initial assessment". CONCLUSION: This work outlines how a consensus meeting can be used to design an educational intervention to improve patient care and outcomes. Through combining the perspectives of both the trainer and trainee, the course aligns both agendas so that it is relevant and sustainable.