Simplified calculation of mechanical power for pressure controlled ventilation in Covid-19 ARDS patients.

BACKGROUND: Mechanical power (MP) is a promising tool for guidance of lung protective ventilation. Different equations have been proposed to calculate MP in pressure control ventilation (PCV). The aim of this study is to introduce an easy to use MP equation MPpcv(m-simpl) and compare it to an equation proposed by Van der Meijden et al. (MPpcv) which considered as the reference equation in PCV. METHODS: Ventilatory parameters of 206 Covid-19 ARDS patients recorded between 24-72 hours after admission to intensive care unit. The PCV data from these patients were retrospectively investigated. MP in PCV was calculated with a modified equation (MPpcv(m-simpl)) derived from the equation (MPpcv) of Van der Meijden et al.: 0.098xRRx∆Vx(PEEP+∆Pinsp - 1). The results from MPpcv(slope), MPpcv(simpl), and MPpcv(m-simpl) were compared to MPpcv at 15 cmH2O ∙ s/L inspiratory resistance levels by univariable regression and Bland-Altman analysis. RESULTS: Inspiratory resistance levels at 15 cmH2O s/L was found to be correlated between the power values calculated by MPpcv(simpl)/MPpcv(m-simpl) and the MPpcv(slope)/MPpcv based on univariable logistic regression (R2≥98) analyses. In the comparison of all patients average MP values computed by the MPpcv(m-simpl) equation and the MPpcv reference equation. Bland-Altman analysis mean difference and p values at 15 cmH2O s/L inspiratory resistance values (J/min) were found to be MPpcv(m-simpl) vs MPpcv=-0,04 (P=0.014); MPpcv(slope) vs. MPpcv=0.63 (P<0.0001); MPpcv(simpl) vs. MPpcv=0.64 J/min (P<0.0001), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study confirmed that the MPpcv(m-simpl) equation can be used easily to calculate MP at bedside in pressure control ventilated COVID-19 ARDS patients.

Comparison of Respiratory and Hemodynamic Parameters of COVID-19 and Non-COVID-19 ARDS Patients.

BACKGROUND: COVID-19 can cause a clinical spectrum from asymptomatic disease to life-threatening respiratory failure and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). There is an ongoing discussion whether the clinical presentation and ventilatory parameters are the same as typical ARDS or not. There is no clear understanding of how the hemodynamic parameters have been affected in COVID-19 ARDS patients. We aimed to compare hemodynamic and respiratory parameters of moderate and severe COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 ARDS patients. These patients were monitored with an advanced hemodynamic measurement system by the transpulmonary thermodilution method in prone and supine positions. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data of 17 patients diagnosed with COVID-19 and 16 patients diagnosed with other types of diseases with moderate and severe ARDS, mechanically ventilated, placed in a prone position, had advanced hemodynamic measurements with PiCCO, and stayed in the intensive care unit for more than a week were analyzed retrospectively. Patient characteristics and arterial blood gases analysis recorded at admission and respiratory and advanced hemodynamic parameters during the first week were compared in prone and supine positions. RESULTS: No difference was observed in the respiratory parameters including respiratory system compliance between COVID-19 and non-COVD-19 patients in prone and supine positions. In comparison of advanced hemodynamic parameters in the first week of intensive care, the extravascular lung water and pulmonary vascular permeability indexes measured in supine position of COVID-19 ARDS patients were found to be significantly higher than non-COVID-19 patients. Duration of prone position was significantly longer in patients diagnosed with COVID-19 ARDS. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study suggested that COVID-19 ARDS is a variant of typical ARDS with a different pathophysiology. HOW TO CITE THIS ARTICLE: Asar S, Acicbe Ö, Sabaz MS, Tontu F, Canan E, Cukurova Z, et al. Comparison of Respiratory and Hemodynamic Parameters of COVID-19 and Non-COVID-19 ARDS Patients. Indian J Crit Care Med 2021;25(6):704-708.