ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Adenoma detection rate (ADR) is an important quality assurance measure for colonoscopy. Some studies suggest that narrow-band imaging (NBI) may be more effective at detecting adenomas than white-light endoscopy (WLE) when bowel preparation is optimal. We conducted a meta-analysis of data from individual patients in randomized controlled trials that compared the efficacy of NBI to WLE in detection of adenomas. METHODS: We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases through April 2017 for randomized controlled trials that assessed detection of colon polyps by high-definition WLE vs NBI and from which data on individual patients were available. The primary outcome measure was ADR adjusted for bowel preparation quality. Multilevel regression models were used with patients nested within trials, and trial included as a random effect. RESULTS: We collected data from 11 trials, comprising 4491 patients and 6636 polyps detected. Adenomas were detected in 952 of 2251 (42.3%) participants examined by WLE vs 1011 of 2239 (45.2%) participants examined by NBI (unadjusted odds ratio [OR] for detection of adenoma by WLE vs NBI, 1.14; 95% CI, 1.01-1.29; P = .04). NBI outperformed WLE only when bowel preparation was best: adequate preparation OR, 1.07 (95% CI, 0.92-1.24; P = .38) vs best preparation OR, 1.30 (95% CI, 1.04-1.62; P = .02). Second-generation bright NBI had a better ADR than WLE (second-generation NBI OR, 1.28; 95% CI, 1.05-1.56; P = .02), whereas first-generation NBI did not. NBI detected more non-adenomatous polyps than WLE (OR, 1.24; 95% CI, 1.06-1.44; P = .008) and flat polyps than WLE (OR, 1.24; 95% CI, 1.02-1.51; P = .03). CONCLUSIONS: In a meta-analysis of data from individual patients in randomized controlled trials, we found NBI to have a higher ADR than WLE, and that this effect is greater when bowel preparation is optimal.
Subject(s)
Adenoma/diagnostic imaging , Colonoscopy/methods , Colorectal Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Narrow Band Imaging/methods , Adenoma/epidemiology , Cathartics/administration & dosage , Colonoscopy/statistics & numerical data , Colorectal Neoplasms/epidemiology , Humans , Narrow Band Imaging/statistics & numerical data , Quality Assurance, Health Care , Randomized Controlled Trials as TopicABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: A colonoscopy may frequently miss polyps and cancers. A number of techniques have emerged to improve visualization and to reduce the rate of adenoma miss. METHODS: We conducted a randomized controlled trial (RCT) in two clinics of the Gastrointestinal Department of the Sanitas University Foundation in Bogota, Colombia. Eligible adult patients presenting for screening or diagnostic elective colonoscopy were randomly allocated to undergo conventional colonoscopy or narrow-band imaging (NBI) during instrument withdrawal by three experienced endoscopists. For the systematic review, studies were identified from the Cochrane Library, PUBMED and LILACS and assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias tool. RESULTS: We enrolled a total of 482 patients (62.5% female), with a mean age of 58.33 years (SD 12.91); 241 into the intervention (NBI) colonoscopy and 241 into the conventional colonoscopy group. Most patients presented for diagnostic colonoscopy (75.3%). The overall rate of polyp detection was significantly higher in the conventional group compared to the NBI group (RR 0.75, 95%CI 0.60 to 0.96). However, no significant differences were found in the mean number of polyps (MD -0.1; 95%CI -0.25 to 0.05), and the mean number of adenomas (MD 0.04 95%CI -0.09 to 0.17). Meta-analysis of studies (regardless of indication) did not find any significant differences in the mean number of polyps (5 RCT, 2479 participants; WMD -0.07 95% CI -0.21 to 0.07; I2 68%), the mean number of adenomas (8 RCT, 3517 participants; WMD -0.08 95% CI -0.17; 0.01 to I2 62%) and the rate of patients with at least one adenoma (8 RCT, 3512 participants, RR 0.96 95% CI 0.88 to 1,04;I2 0%). CONCLUSION: NBI does not improve detection of colorectal polyps when compared to conventional colonoscopy (Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12610000456055).
Subject(s)
Colonic Polyps/diagnosis , Colonoscopy/methods , Image Enhancement/methods , Adenocarcinoma/diagnosis , Adenoma/diagnosis , Colonic Neoplasms/diagnosis , Female , Humans , Male , Middle AgedABSTRACT
Las dilataciones quísticas congénitas del colédoco (DQC) son las formaciones congénitas con mayor riesgo de desarrollar coledocolitiasis, colestasis crónica y cáncer de las vías biliares. En el presente trabajo informamos doce casos, que corresponden al 2,4 por ciento de las 1.500 colangiopancreatografías retrógradas endoscópicas (CPRE) realizadas en los últimos 18 meses. El promedio de edad fue de 44,6 años, con predominio del género femenino (75 por ciento). El principal diagnóstico clínico anterior al examen fue la obstrucción de la vía biliar en 5 pacientes (42 por ciento); en dos casos hubo sospecha de coledocolitiasis y, en otros dos, de colelitiasis; en ninguno se hizo diagnóstico previo de quiste. Ocho pacientes tenían quiste tipo I, tres del tipo V y uno del tipo II. En 8 pacientes (58 por ciento) se realizó esfinterotomía y a 6 de ellos se les extrajeron cálculos. Las DQC se deben tener en cuenta en el diagnóstico diferencial de la enfermedad litiásica de las vías biliares y la CPRE o la colangiografía por resonancia tienen un papel preponderante en el diagnóstico. Se hace una revisión de la bibliografía
