Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Spinal Cord Ser Cases ; 6(1): 17, 2020 03 24.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32210224

ABSTRACT

STUDY DESIGN: Descriptive study. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this manuscript is to describe the development process of the data set for the National Spinal Cord Injury Registry of Iran (NSCIR-IR). SETTING: SCI community in Iran. METHODS: The NSCIR-IR data set was developed in 8 months, from March 2015 to October 2015. An expert panel of 14 members was formed. After a review of data sets of similar registries in developed countries, the selection and modification of the basic framework were performed over 16 meetings, based on the objectives and feasibility of the registry. RESULTS: The final version of the data set was composed of 376 data elements including sociodemographic, hospital admission, injury incidence, prehospital procedures, emergency department visit, medical history, vertebral injury, spinal cord injury details, interventions, complications, and discharge data. It also includes 163 components of the International Standards for the Neurologic Classification of Spinal Cord Injury (ISNCSCI) and 65 data elements related to quality of life, pressure ulcers, pain, and spasticity. CONCLUSION: The NSCIR-IR data set was developed in order to meet the quality improvement objectives of the registry. The process was centered around choosing the data elements assessing care provided to individuals in the acute and chronic phases of SCI in hospital settings. The International Spinal Cord Injury Data Set was selected as a basic framework, helped by comparison with data from other countries. Expert panel modifications facilitated the implementation of the registry process with the current clinical workflow in hospitals.


Subject(s)
Databases, Factual/standards , Health Personnel/standards , Quality of Health Care/standards , Registries/standards , Spinal Cord Injuries/epidemiology , Spinal Cord Injuries/therapy , Databases, Factual/trends , Health Personnel/trends , Humans , Iran/epidemiology , Quality of Health Care/trends
2.
Clin Neurol Neurosurg ; 151: 37-42, 2016 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27764706

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Despite the progress in understanding acute pain physiology during recent decade, eighty percent of patients still suffer from post-operative discomfort. Pregabalin is an anticonvulsant agent that is approved for painful neuropathies in diabetic patients and post herpetic neuralgia. The main objective of the present study was to compare the improvement in post-operative pain management and patient lifestyle in 3 groups, as first group received placebo, second who received Pregabalin for one day and the last group those who received it for 14 days. METHODS: This was a prospective single center, randomized, triple-blind, 3-arm, parallel group study. In this triple-blind study, patients were randomized to 1 of 3 groups using computer-generated random number table. 1) The first group received placebo for 14 days, the second group received Pregabalin 300mg 8h preoperatively and 150mg 12 and 24h postoperatively and for the rest of 13days received placebo and the third group received Pregabalin 300mg eight hours preoperatively and 15mg every 12h postoperatively for 14 days. Name, age, gender, height, weight, education, duration of pain, past medical history, drug history,total morphine requirement at the time of discharge and MRI findings of all the patients were recorded, also they Numerical scale system (NRS) and Oswestry low back pain disability index (ODI) questionnaire were completed for them. All the patients were operated based on standard surgery techniques, bilateral foramenotomy and interlaminar discectomy. RESULTS: Of the 105 patients who entered the run-in period, 47 patients (44.8%) were female and 58 (55.2%) were male. The Patients radicular pain mean score based on NRS estimated before surgery was 7.22±1.95 in pregabalin14, 7.71±1.84 in pregabalin1 and 7.45±1.9 in control group. There were no statically significant differences between three groups (P-Value>0.05). The Patients back pain mean score based on NRS was 5.2±2.87 in pregabalin14, 5.11±3.23 in pregabalin1 and 6.4±3.06 in control group. This means that there were no significant differences in the overall score among those three groups (P-Value>0.05). In comparison to their preoperative pain, the average radicular pain in each group of patients improved significantly 4, 8, 12 and 24h after the operation (P-Value<0.001), but there were no significant differences in radicular pain improvements comparing three groups. CONCLUSION: The results of this study indicate that 1day and 2 weeks post-operative 300mg pregabalin administration may not improve acute pain, morphine consumption and quality of life of patients after surgery. It seems that the diseases cause chronic pain that requires long-term treatment with higher doses.


Subject(s)
Analgesics/pharmacology , Diskectomy/adverse effects , Lumbar Vertebrae/surgery , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Pain, Postoperative/drug therapy , Pregabalin/pharmacology , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Analgesics/administration & dosage , Double-Blind Method , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pregabalin/administration & dosage , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...