2024 ACC/AHA/AACVPR/APMA/ABC/SCAI/SVM/SVN/SVS/SIR/VESS Guideline for the Management of Lower Extremity Peripheral Artery Disease: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines.

AIM: The "2024 ACC/AHA/AACVPR/APMA/ABC/SCAI/SVM/SVN/SVS/SIR/VESS Guideline for the Management of Lower Extremity Peripheral Artery Disease" provides recommendations to guide clinicians in the treatment of patients with lower extremity peripheral artery disease across its multiple clinical presentation subsets (ie, asymptomatic, chronic symptomatic, chronic limb-threatening ischemia, and acute limb ischemia). METHODS: A comprehensive literature search was conducted from October 2020 to June 2022, encompassing studies, reviews, and other evidence conducted on human subjects that was published in English from PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, CINHL Complete, and other selected databases relevant to this guideline. Additional relevant studies, published through May 2023 during the peer review process, were also considered by the writing committee and added to the evidence tables where appropriate. STRUCTURE: Recommendations from the "2016 AHA/ACC Guideline on the Management of Patients With Lower Extremity Peripheral Artery Disease" have been updated with new evidence to guide clinicians. In addition, new recommendations addressing comprehensive care for patients with peripheral artery disease have been developed.

2024 ACC/AHA/AACVPR/APMA/ABC/SCAI/SVM/SVN/SVS/SIR/VESS Guideline for the Management of Lower Extremity Peripheral Artery Disease: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines.

AIM: The "2024 ACC/AHA/AACVPR/APMA/ABC/SCAI/SVM/SVN/SVS/SIR/VESS Guideline for the Management of Lower Extremity Peripheral Artery Disease" provides recommendations to guide clinicians in the treatment of patients with lower extremity peripheral artery disease across its multiple clinical presentation subsets (ie, asymptomatic, chronic symptomatic, chronic limb-threatening ischemia, and acute limb ischemia). METHODS: A comprehensive literature search was conducted from October 2020 to June 2022, encompassing studies, reviews, and other evidence conducted on human subjects that was published in English from PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, CINHL Complete, and other selected databases relevant to this guideline. Additional relevant studies, published through May 2023 during the peer review process, were also considered by the writing committee and added to the evidence tables where appropriate. STRUCTURE: Recommendations from the "2016 AHA/ACC Guideline on the Management of Patients With Lower Extremity Peripheral Artery Disease" have been updated with new evidence to guide clinicians. In addition, new recommendations addressing comprehensive care for patients with peripheral artery disease have been developed.

Status Report on the Integrated and Independent IR Residencies: Origins and Projections for the Future.

The field of interventional radiology (IR) has undergone a historic transformation since 2014, marked by the approval of the IR residency program. This paradigm shift has revolutionized the traditional training pathway, which previously comprised a 1-year vascular and IR fellowship after diagnostic radiology residency. The introduction of integrated and independent IR residencies, including the option for Early Specialization in Interventional Radiology (ESIR), has reshaped the landscape of IR training. The implementation of the IR residency has been exceptionally successful, with the IR residency continuing to be one of the most sought-after residencies for medical students. Additionally, the option for IR training in diagnostic radiology has been retained, accommodating both ESIR and non-ESIR residents. With the continuous growth of accredited programs and rising popularity of IR as a specialty, the future of IR appears limitless.

Balloon-Targeted Extra-Anatomic Sharp Recanalization Technique to Re-establish Supraclavicular Vascular Access.

A balloon-targeted extra-anatomic sharp recanalization (BEST) technique was investigated to re-establish supraclavicular vascular access in patients with central venous occlusion. Query of the authors' institution's database yielded 130 patients who underwent central venous recanalization. Of these, a retrospective review of 5 patients with concurrent thoracic central venous and bilateral internal jugular vein occlusions who underwent sharp recanalization using the BEST technique from May 2018 to August 2022 was performed. Technical success was achieved in all cases without major adverse events. Four (80%) of the 5 patients underwent hemodialysis reliable outflow (HeRO) graft placement using the newly established supraclavicular vascular access.

Delphi Consensus on Reporting Standards in Clinical Studies for Endovascular Treatment of Acute Iliofemoral Venous Thrombosis and Chronic Iliofemoral Venous Obstruction.

Acute iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis and chronic iliofemoral venous obstruction cause substantial patient harm and are increasingly managed with endovascular venous interventions, including percutaneous mechanical thrombectomy and stent placement. However, studies of these treatment elements have not been designed and reported with sufficient rigor to support confident conclusions about their clinical utility. In this project, the Trustworthy consensus-based statement approach was utilized to develop, via a structured process, consensus-based statements to guide future investigators of venous interventions. Thirty statements were drafted to encompass major topics relevant to venous study description and design, safety outcome assessment, efficacy outcome assessment, and topics specific to evaluating percutaneous venous thrombectomy and stent placement. Using modified Delphi techniques for consensus achievement, a panel of physician experts in vascular disease voted on the statements and succeeded in reaching the predefined threshold of >80% consensus (agreement or strong agreement) on all 30 statements. It is hoped that the guidance from these statements will improve standardization, objectivity, and patient-centered relevance in the reporting of clinical outcomes of endovascular interventions for acute iliofemoral deep venous thrombosis and chronic iliofemoral venous obstruction in clinical studies and thereby enhance venous patient care.

Effect of intra-arterial vasodilator administration during radial artery access on systemic blood pressure in patients receiving moderate sedation.

PURPOSE: The hemodynamic effects of intra-arterial vasodilator administration for the prevention of radial artery spasm during transradial access have not been well characterized. This study evaluates the effect of intra-arterial Verapamil and Nitroglycerine administration on systemic blood pressure and its correlation with timing of moderate sedation administration. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Institutional review board approval was granted. Patients who underwent transradial access from 4/2018 to 4/2019 and received both intra-arterial vasodilators and moderate sedation were identified and their electronic medical records reviewed. Patients were divided into three cohorts based on the timing of sedation and intra-arterial vasodilator administration. Decrease in systolic blood pressure (SBP) was expressed as means with standard deviation which were then compared using Student's t-test. RESULTS: A total of 84 patients who met inclusion criteria demonstrated an overall mean decrease in SBP of 16.45 mmHg ± 15.45 mmHg. Patients receiving sedation and intra-arterial vasodilators within their expected peak SBP effect times had similar SBP change following the intra-arterial vasodilators as those in whom the interval was greater than 10 min (4.2 mmHg; 95% CI (-4.11 to 12.52), p = 0.3171). Two patients experienced asymptomatic hypotension. CONCLUSIONS: Patients undergoing transradial access for procedures utilizing moderate sedation can safely receive intra-arterial Verapamil and Nitroglycerine for prevention of radial artery spasm.

Prospective Study of Radial Artery Occlusion Following Transradial Arterial Access during IR Procedures.

PURPOSE: To prospectively determine the rate of radial artery occlusion (RAO) in patients undergoing transradial access for intra-arterial interventions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seventy-seven patients undergoing transradial access from August 2019 to March 2021 for 120 intra-arterial procedures (yttrium-90 mapping [n = 39] and radioembolization [n = 38], uterine artery embolization [n = 19], transarterial chemoembolization [n = 10], active bleed embolization [n = 8], angiomyolipoma embolization [n = 4], and other [n = 2]) were enrolled. The average patient age was 59 years ± 13.1 (range, 30-90 years), and 43 (55.8%) of the 77 patients were men. The patients underwent radial artery (RA) palpation, ultrasound evaluation, the Barbeau test, and the reverse Barbeau test prior to and following the intervention. Verapamil, nitroglycerin, and heparin were administered in a total of 114 (95%) of the 120 procedures prior to starting the procedure. The incidence of RAO and radial artery spasm (RAS) was calculated, and univariate logistic regression was performed to analyze the predictors of RAS. RESULTS: The preprocedural RA diameter (3.0 mm ± 0.67) was not significantly different from the postprocedural RA diameter (3.0 mm ± 0.65, P = .904). The RAO rate was determined to be 0.8% (1/120), and this artery recanalized within 1 week. Due to the small number of occlusions, statistical analysis of predictors of RAO was not performed. The rate of RAS was 22.7% (27/119). None of the variables tested-including age, sex, RA diameter, initial versus repeat access, operator experience, and artery puncture technique-showed significant prediction for RAS. Patients were seen for follow-up after 111 (92.5%) of the 120 procedures. CONCLUSIONS: Transradial access resulted in a <1% rate of RAO.

The Impact of COVID-19 on Interventional Radiology Training Programs: What You Need to Know.

The COVID-19 pandemic has affected medical education in unprecedented ways. Herein, we briefly describe the affects of COVID-19 on Interventional Radiology residency training and summarize up to date guidance by governing bodies and key stakeholders.

Suprarenal Inferior Vena Cava Filter Placement and Retrieval: Safety Analysis.

PURPOSE: To evaluate safety and retrieval success of retrievable suprarenal inferior vena cava (IVC) filters. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective chart review of patients who received a retrievable suprarenal IVC filter between January 2008 and December 2017 was conducted. Suprarenal IVC filters were placed in 24 female and 27 male patients. The most common indications for filter placement were IVC thrombus (n = 20; 39.2%) and iliofemoral venous thrombosis with contraindication to anticoagulation (n = 16; 31.3%). The most common indications for suprarenal placement were IVC thrombus (n = 20; 39.2%), anatomic variants (n = 17; 33.3%), and external IVC compression (n = 8; 15.8%). Duplicated IVC was the most common anatomic variant requiring suprarenal placement (n = 7; 13.7%). RESULTS: Günther Tulip (n = 40; 78.4%), Denali (n = 10; 19.6%), and Celect (n = 1; 2.0%) filters were used. Retrieval was attempted in 27 of the 51 filters placed (52.9%). Of the 27 attempted retrievals, the technical success rate was 100% (27/27). The median dwell time was 87.0 days (95% confidence interval, 28-137 d). One complication involving fractured struts during filter retrieval occurred. No significant change in craniocaudal filter position, lateral filter tilt, or renal function between placement and retrieval was observed (P < .05). There were no instances of indwelling filter fracture. CONCLUSIONS: Suprarenal IVC filters, when indicated, can be placed and retrieved with a low complication rate.

Factors Related to Late False Lumen Enlargement after Thoracic Stent-Graft Placement for Type B Aortic Dissection.

PURPOSE: To evaluate significant factors related to delayed aortic false lumen (FL) enlargement in patients who have undergone thoracic stent-graft placement for type B aortic dissection. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study included 62 patients (45 male, 17 female) aged 26-80 years (mean age, 58.1 y) who underwent thoracic endovascular aortic repair for type B aortic dissection at a single institution between January 2005 and May 2015. Mean age of aortic dissections was 5.3 months (range, 0.1-73.3 mo). Maximum aortic diameter at presentation was 41.7 mm ± 8.3. The follow-up period ranged from 3 to 104 months (mean, 27.1 mo). Computed tomographic (CT) angiography studies were reviewed to identify FL diameter enlargements > 5 mm at different levels along and distal to the stent graft. Imaging findings and clinical variables were investigated to determine their correlation with FL enlargement. RESULTS: No significant difference was found between the ages of aortic dissections in patients with and without FL enlargement (P = .26). On follow-up CT angiography, 16 patients had 2 or more communication channels between the FL and the systemic circulation, 7 of whom showed FL enlargement > 5 mm (P = .007). Twenty-seven patients showed complete FL thrombosis, none of whom had FL enlargement (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Two or more communication channels between the FL and the systemic circulation represent a risk factor for FL enlargement regardless of the age of the dissection. Patients with thrombosis of the FL are less likely to experience FL enlargement.