Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Clin Liver Dis (Hoboken) ; 23(1): e0183, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38881725

ABSTRACT

It is alarming that globally, only 2.2% (6.6 million) of patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) received treatment in 2019. One contributing factor to this low treatment rate is the complexity and restrictive nature of clinical practice guidelines. Since 1998, we have adopted a "treat-all" approach to patients with CHB. A retrospective study was conducted involving patients with CHB who received treatment from 1998 to 2020 at 2 institutions in Egypt. These patients underwent evaluation through various clinical and laboratory methods, which included testing for liver enzymes and HBV DNA. The study analyzed 1825 patients with HBV, finding that 27.4% had viremia levels under 2000 IU/mL. Most (88%) were HBeAg-negative, with 12% positive. A large portion (77.6%) had normal alanine aminotransferase levels, though 5.6% exceeded twice the upper limit of normal. About 14.2% were diagnosed with liver cirrhosis, and 9.6% with F3 stage fibrosis at enrollment. Notably, 2% (25 cases) lost HBsAg over a median of 52 months. Patients with HBV DNA <2000 IU/mL had a higher HBsAg loss rate (4.2%) compared to those with levels >2000 IU/mL (1.3%). During follow-up, 9.5% (117 patients) experienced decompensation, with a higher incidence in those with HBV DNA <2000 IU/mL (16.8%) than those >2000 IU/mL (7.1%). HCC developed in 5.2% of patients with lower HBV DNA and 2.6% with higher levels, showing significant differences. Liver-related deaths occurred in 2.8% of the cohort, with a slightly higher rate in those with lower initial HBV DNA levels (3.5% vs. 2.5%). The findings suggest a paradigm shift in CHB management toward early and broader eligibility for antiviral therapy. This could improve patient outcomes and address the global treatment gap in CHB management, especially in regions with high CHB prevalence.

2.
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth ; 37(10): 2012-2019, 2023 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37516595

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The choice of oral or nasal endotracheal intubation in children undergoing cardiac surgery is affected by several factors. This study compared the outcomes of oral versus nasal intubation in neonates and infants who underwent open cardiac surgery. DESIGN: A randomized, controlled, open-labeled study. SETTING: At a university hospital. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 220 infants and neonates who underwent cardiac surgery. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were allocated randomly to oral or nasal intubation. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The primary outcome measure was postoperative fentanyl consumption (µg/kg/h) by intubated patients. Secondary outcome measures were the increase in heart rate (HR) from baseline during intubation, the time consumed for intubation, accidental intraoperative extubation, the occurrence of epistaxis, time to extubation, the onset of full oral feeding, intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital lengths of stay, and the incidence of postoperative complications (the need for reintubation, stridor, pneumonia, wound infection). The mean (SD) postoperative fentanyl consumption of intubated patients (the primary outcome) was significantly lower (p < 0.001) in the nasal intubation group (0.53 ± 0.48) µg/kg/h compared with the oral intubation group (0.82 ± 0.20) µg/kg/h. The median (IQR) time needed for the intubation (31.5, 27-35 v 16, 14.8-18 seconds) was significantly (p < 0.001) longer, and the mean (SD) increase in HR (beats/min) from baseline during intubation (18 ± 5 v 26 ± 7) was significantly (p < 0.001) lower in the nasal intubation group compared to the oral intubation group. The incidence of inadvertent intraoperative extubation was significantly (p = 0.029) higher in the oral (n = 6, 6.1%) than in the nasal (n = 0, 0%) intubation group. The median (IQR) time to extubation (14, 12.6-17.2 v 20.5, 16.4-25.4 hours) and the ICU length of stay (27, 26-28 v 30, 28-34 hours) were significantly (p < 0.05) shorter in the nasal group compared to the oral group. The median (IQR) time to onset of full oral feeding was significantly (p = 0.031) shorter in the nasal intubation group (3, 1-6 days) compared to the oral intubation group (4, 2-7 days). There were no significant differences between the oral and nasal groups in the duration of hospital stay and the indices for reintubation, postintubation stridor, pneumonia, and surgical wound infection. CONCLUSIONS: The nasal route for intubation is associated with less postoperative fentanyl consumption, earlier extubation, lower incidence of accidental extubation, and earlier full oral feeding than oral intubation. The nasal route is not associated with an increased risk of postoperative pneumonia or surgical wound infection.


Subject(s)
Cardiac Surgical Procedures , Pneumonia , Infant, Newborn , Child , Humans , Infant , Surgical Wound Infection/etiology , Respiratory Sounds/etiology , Cardiac Surgical Procedures/adverse effects , Intubation, Intratracheal/adverse effects , Fentanyl , Airway Extubation/adverse effects , Length of Stay
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...