Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Reconstr Microsurg ; 37(1): 75-82, 2021 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32110822

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Preoperative ultrasound (US)-guided perforator mapping has immensely simplified perforator flap planning. It may be executed by the microsurgeon. Device settings and selection of ultrasound modes are of utmost significance for detection of low-flow microvessels. The following study evaluates different US modes. METHODS: A prospective complete data acquisition was performed from July 2018 to June 2019 in a subset of patients who underwent US-guided flap planning. Multifrequency linear transducers were used applying five US modes. Brightness (B)-mode, color flow (CF), power Doppler (PD), pulse wave (PW), and B-flow modes were evaluated regarding applicability by microsurgeons. Peak systolic velocity (PSV), end diastolic velocity (EDV), and resistance index (RI) were chosen to evaluate flow characteristics. US results were correlated to intraoperative findings. RESULTS: A total number of eight patients (six males and two females) undergoing anterolateral thigh (ALT) or superficial circumflex iliac artery perforator (SCIP) flap surgery received an extensive standardized US-guided perforator characterization. Qualitative evaluation was performed in B-mode, color-coded duplex sonography (CCDS), PD, and B-flow mode. Quantitative assessment was executed using PW-mode and CCDS measuring the microvessels' diameter (mm) and flow characteristics (PSV, EDV, and RI). CCDS provided a mean diameter of 1.93 mm (range: 1.2-2.8 ± 0.51), a mean systolic peak of 16.9 cm/s (range: 9.9-33.4 ± 7.79), and mean RI of 0.71 (range: 0.55-0.87 ± 0.09) for lower limb perforators. All perforators located with US were verified by intraoperative findings. An optimized, time-effective US mapping algorithm was derived. Qualitative parameters may be evaluated with B-mode, CF, or B-flow. Smallest microvessels may be assessed in PD-mode. Lowering pulse-repetition frequency (PRF)/scale is mandatory to image low-flow microvessels as perforators. Quantitative information may be obtained using PW-mode and the distance-measuring tool in CF-mode. Image and video materials are provided. CONCLUSION: CCDS proved to be a powerful tool for preoperative perforator characterization when using a structured approach and mapping algorithm. Different techniques may be applied for specific visualizations and performed by the microsurgeon.


Subject(s)
Perforator Flap , Plastic Surgery Procedures , Female , Humans , Male , Prospective Studies , Thigh/diagnostic imaging , Thigh/surgery , Ultrasonography, Interventional
2.
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg ; 73(6): 1081-1090, 2020 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32249187

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The anterolateral thigh (ALT) perforator flap is a popular reconstructive tissue transfer. Consistent with the "hot/cold zone" concept for rapid dissection and thin flap harvest, reliable preoperative perforator mapping is mandatory. Color-coded duplex sonography (CCDS) has been shown to have the highest pooled sensitivity and positive predictive value to identify ALT perforating vessels. By reviewing this guide, the reader should learn: 1. Probe selection and basic/advanced device settings 2. Interpreting tissue morphology 3. Structured mapping approach 4. Pedicle position planning 5. Safe flap design 6. Assess subcutaneous course and flap's thickness for subfascial/epifascial/suprafascial harvest 7. Implement perforators identified into a tailor-made flap design including chimeric flaps. METHODS: Experiences with ultrasound-guided flap design gained from 125 ALT perforator flap free tissue transfers performed in two reconstructive centers was the basis of our guide. Our structured method comprises standardized markings, patient positioning, and simple ergonomics. Basic and advanced CCDS settings, selection, and conventional probe guidance are outlined for the microsurgeon. RESULTS: Linear multifrequency probes (6-15 MHz) were used. Best preset programs were breast, thyroid, and vascular. Favorable device properties were depth focused to 2-5 cm, pulse repetition frequency (PRF/Scale) set low to 0.5-1.5 kHz/3-10 cm/s, color gain high, and wall filter (WF) low/off (< 50 Hz). Additional parameters were discussed. A 100% concordance rate was seen comparing preoperative perforator visualization with CCDS and intraoperative findings. Detailed picture and video material were demonstrated. CONCLUSION: CCDS is a powerful tool for preoperative perforator mapping in perforator flaps such as the ALT.


Subject(s)
Free Tissue Flaps/surgery , Perforator Flap/surgery , Thigh/surgery , Ultrasonography, Interventional/methods , Humans , Patient Positioning , Plastic Surgery Procedures/instrumentation , Plastic Surgery Procedures/methods , Thigh/diagnostic imaging
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...