Reliability of bimanual pelvic examinations performed in emergency departments.

OBJECTIVE: To test the reliability of bimanual pelvic examinations performed in emergency departments by emergency medicine physicians. DESIGN: Prospective observational study; 2 examiners each recorded various pelvic examination findings on 186 patients. SETTING: A private university hospital and a public county hospital staffed by attending emergency medicine physicians who share an emergency medicine residency program. SUBJECTS: Senior resident (3rd or 4th year) and attending emergency physicians. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Percentage of agreement and percentage of positive agreement for cervical motion tenderness, uterine tenderness, adnexal tenderness, adnexal mass, and uterine size (within 2 cm). RESULTS: The agreement ranged between 71% and 84%, but the percentage of positive agreement was much lower, ranging from 17% to 33%. Agreement for uterine size, within 2 cm, was 60%. CONCLUSION: The findings of bimanual pelvic examinations performed by emergency physicians in an emergency department have poor interexaminer reliability.

Failure of the mandatory domestic violence reporting law to increase medical facility referral to police.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To assess the effect of California's 1994 mandatory domestic violence reporting law on Los Angeles Sheriff's Department dispatches to medical facilities for domestic violence incidents. METHODS: This ecological time-trend study analyzed data from the Los Angeles Sheriff's Department for the period January 1, 1993, to December 31, 1995. All 26,051 dispatches for domestic violence offenses during the study period were analyzed. The outcome measures were changes in biweekly department dispatches for domestic violence offenses resulting from the implementation of the mandatory domestic violence reporting law adjusted for seasonal variation and the Simpson/Goldman murders. RESULTS: The percentage of biweekly dispatches to medical facilities for domestic violence offenses did not increase in response to the law (beta = -.0072, P = .095). Total domestic violence dispatches increased significantly after the Simpson/Goldman murders but not after passage of the law (beta = 82.7, P < .0001 versus beta = -10.1, P = .2205). CONCLUSION: The mandatory domestic violence reporting law in California did not increase medical personnel reporting of domestic violence situations to the Sheriff's Department during the 2 years after its implementation.

Need for law enforcement in cases of intimate partner violence in a university ED.

The purpose of this study was to quantify the proportion of men and women seen in a university emergency department (ED) for treatment of injuries resulting from intimate partner violence (IPV) that require reports to law enforcement authorities. A total of 1,516 adult ED patients were asked to complete a written survey instrument; 1,003 patients (66.2%) completed the survey. Two percent of patients reported they presented to the ED for treatment of injuries resulting from IPV. Three percent reported IPV within the last year, and 10% reported that they had ever been physically abused by a partner. Six percent of respondents reported that they had ever been threatened with a gun or knife by a partner, 2% within the past year. Only the lifetime prevalence of IPV was significantly greater among female patients, 15% versus 6% (P < .001). Approximately 2% of our ED patients require law enforcement intervention for IPV.

Usefulness of the Neurobehavioral Cognitive Status Examination in the hospitalized elderly.

A prospective pilot study compared the Neurobehavioral Cognitive Status Examination (NCSE) to the Folstein Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) to determine the usefulness of the NCSE as a cognitive screen in a geriatric inpatient population. All patients directly admitted to the geriatric evaluation and treatment unit (GETU) of a university teaching hospital over a two-and-a-half-month period were eligible for the study, in which 42% participated. Within 72 hours of admission, patients were given the MMSE and the NCSE in a nonrandom order by a trained psychologist and a structured interview by a psychiatrist. The ability of the NCSE to detect global cognitive impairment was compared to the MMSE and psychiatrist's assessment. Differences in sensitivity were examined by discordant pair analysis. The psychiatrist's determination of the presence of cognitive impairment was used as the criterion standard. Comparisons of the MMSE and NCSE, respectively, revealed the following: sensitivity 83% versus 100%; specificity 78% versus 11%; positive predictive value 83% versus 43%; and negative predictive value 78% versus 100%. Seven patients who were cognitively impaired by the NCSE were not impaired by the MMSE (p less than 0.05 by discordant pair analysis). The time of administration for the two tests was significantly shorter for the MMSE (14.75 +/- 5.7 minutes) than for the NCSE (38.9 +/- 12.9 minutes). The NCSE was found to be more sensitive than the MMSE in detecting cognitive impairment among geriatric inpatients, but its specificity and positive predictive values were lower. Beyond this pilot study, additional work examining the utility of the NCSE in other geriatric settings and for different purposes (e.g., as part of comprehensive assessment) needs to be performed.