Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Clin Pharmacol ; 41(10): 1120-30, 2001 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11583481

ABSTRACT

Rofecoxib is a highly selective and potent inhibitor of cyclooxgenase-2 (COX-2). Methotrexate is a disease-modifying agent with a narrow therapeutic index frequently prescribed for the management of rheumatoid arthritis. The objective of this study was to investigate the influence of clinical doses of rofecoxib on the pharmacokinetics of methotrexate in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. This was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study in 25 rheumatoid arthritis patients on stable doses of methotrexate. Patients received oral methotrexate (7.5 to 20 mg) on days -1, 7, 14, and 21. Nineteen patients received rofecoxib 12.5, 25, and 50 mg once daily on days 1 to 7, 8 to 14, and 15 to 21, respectively. Six patients received placebo on days 1 to 21 only to maintain a double-blinded design for assessment of adverse experiences. Plasma and urine samples were analyzed for methotrexate and its major although inactive metabolite, 7-hydroxymethotrexate. The AUC(0-infinity) geometric mean ratios (GMR) and their 90% confidence intervals (90% CI) (rofecoxib + methotrexate/methotrexate alone) for day 7/day -1, day 14/day -1, and day 21/day -1, for rofecoxib 12.5, 25, and 50 mg, were 1.03 (0.93, 1.14), 1.02 (0.92, 1.12), and 1.06 (0.96, 1.17), respectively (p > 0.2 for all comparisons to day -1). All AUC(0-infinity), GMR and Cmax GMR 90% CIs fell within the predefined comparability limits of (0.80, 1.25). Similar results were observed for renal clearance of methotrexate and 7-hydroxymethotrexate at the highest dose of rofecoxib tested (50 mg). It was concluded that rofecoxib at doses of 12.5, 25, and 50 mg once daily has no effect on the plasma concentrations or renal clearance (tested at the highest dose of rofecoxib) of methotrexate in rheumatoid arthritis patients.


Subject(s)
Antirheumatic Agents/blood , Arthritis, Rheumatoid/blood , Cyclooxygenase Inhibitors/pharmacokinetics , Lactones/pharmacokinetics , Methotrexate/analogs & derivatives , Methotrexate/blood , Adult , Aged , Analysis of Variance , Area Under Curve , Confidence Intervals , Cyclooxygenase Inhibitors/administration & dosage , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Double-Blind Method , Drug Interactions/physiology , Female , Folic Acid Antagonists/blood , Humans , Lactones/administration & dosage , Male , Middle Aged , Sulfones
2.
Rheumatology (Oxford) ; 39(2): 156-64, 2000 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10725065

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To compare the safety, tolerability and efficacy of the new oral microemulsion formulation of cyclosporin A (CyA; Sandimmun Neoral) and the original CyA formulation (Sandimmun), in patients with severe active rheumatoid arthritis (RA), over a 12-month period. METHODS: In this double-blind, multicentre study, patients were randomized to treatment with Neoral or Sandimmun, starting with 2.5 mg/kg/day, with dose adjustments after 4 weeks. Primary efficacy criteria included patients' assessment of disease activity. Pharmacokinetic and safety assessments were performed at regular intervals. RESULTS: Compared with Sandimmun, Neoral showed a consistent trend towards greater clinical efficacy from week 12 onwards, including a significant difference in patients' assessment of disease activity at the study end-points. A significantly lower increase in dose from baseline was observed with Neoral at week 24. Pharmacokinetic assessments at week 24 showed increased absorption and decreased variability with Neoral. No differences in safety were found between treatment groups. CONCLUSION: These observations indicate that Neoral is as safe and at least as effective as Sandimmun and have important implications for patient management given the increasing role for CyA in the treatment of severe, active RA.


Subject(s)
Antirheumatic Agents/therapeutic use , Arthritis, Rheumatoid/drug therapy , Cyclosporine/therapeutic use , Antirheumatic Agents/administration & dosage , Antirheumatic Agents/adverse effects , Arthritis, Rheumatoid/blood , Blood Pressure/drug effects , Chemistry, Pharmaceutical , Creatinine/blood , Cyclosporine/administration & dosage , Cyclosporine/adverse effects , Double-Blind Method , Emulsions , Humans , Joints/drug effects , Joints/pathology , Middle Aged , Patient Satisfaction , Prospective Studies , Safety , Severity of Illness Index , Treatment Outcome
3.
Ann Pharmacother ; 30(7-8): 724-9, 1996.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8826548

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To characterize pentoxifylline (PTF) and metabolite disposition after multiple oral doses given two and three times a day to patients with renal dysfunction. DESIGN: An open-label, randomized, crossover, parallel group design. SETTING: Community-based clinical research center. PATIENT POPULATIONS: Subjects with renal function stratified based on 24-hour urinary creatine clearance (Clcr): group I = Clcr > 80 mL/min (n = 9); group II = Clcr 30-80 mL/min (n = 6); and group III = Clcr < 30 mL/min (n = 10). METHODS: PTF 400 mg bid or tid was administered on days 1-7 and 400 mg bid or tid was given on days 14-20 with a 1-week washout. Timed blood samples were taken on days 1, 7, and 20. Blood samples were analyzed for PTF and its metabolites (M-I, M-IV, M-V) by gas-liquid chromatography. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Maximum plasma concentrations (Cmax), time to maximum concentration (tmax), average steady-state plasma concentration (CavgSS), and area under the plasma concentration-time curve at steady-state (AUCSS) were determined by visual and model independent methods. ANOVA, paired t-test, and linear regression were used with significance level set at p < 0.05. RESULTS: The ratio of PTF AUCSS (tid):AUCSS (bid) and M-I AUCSS (bid and tid) were not significantly different between the groups. Significant differences were found in M-IV and M-V Cmax, AUCSS, CavgSS, and AUCSS ratios (M-IV:PTF and M-V:PTF) between renal function groups (p < 0.05 for all). A change in dosage regimen from tid to bid resulted in significant changes in M-IV and M-V CavgSS for subjects with normal renal function and in those with moderate dysfunction, although not in subjects with severe renal dysfunction. CONCLUSIONS: Renal dysfunction did not cause significant accumulations of PTF or M-I after multiple bid and tid dosing, however, M-IV and M-V had significant accumulation in patients with renal impairment. Dosage reduction to 400 mg bid for patients with moderate renal impairment and 200-400 mg/d for severe renal impairment, as well as close clinical monitoring, seem prudent until the complex pharmacologic interactions of PTF and its metabolites can be further delineated.


Subject(s)
Pentoxifylline/metabolism , Pentoxifylline/pharmacokinetics , Renal Insufficiency/metabolism , Administration, Oral , Adult , Aged , Cross-Over Studies , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pentoxifylline/administration & dosage
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...