Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
1.
J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol ; 56(5): 554-60, 2012 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23043576

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The goal of this study was to determine if clinically relevant endpoints were changed by improved MRI resolution during radiosurgical treatment planning. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between 2003 and 2008, 200 consecutive patients with brain metastases treated with Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKRS) using either 1.5 T or 3.0 T MRI for radiosurgical treatment planning were retrospectively analysed. The number of previously undetected metastases at time of radiosurgery, distant brain failures, time delay to whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT), overall survival and likelihood of neurological death were determined. RESULTS: Additional metastases were detected in 31.3% and 24.5% of patients at time of radiosurgery with 3.0 T and 1.5 T MRI, respectively (P = 0.27). Patients with multiple metastases at diagnostic scan were more likely to have additional metastases detected by 3.0 T MRI (P < 0.1). Median time to distant brain failure was 4.87 months and 5.43 months for the 3.0 T and 1.5 T cohorts, respectively (P = 0.44). Median time to WBRT was 5.8 months and 5.3 months for the 3.0 T and 1.5 T cohorts, respectively (P = 0.87). Median survival was 6.4 months for the 3.0 T cohort, and 6.1 months for the 1.5 T cohort (P = 0.71). Likelihood of neurological death was 25.3% and 16.7% for the 3.0 and 1.5 T populations, respectively (P = 0.26). CONCLUSIONS: The 3.0 T MRI-based treatment planning for GKRS did not appear to affect the likelihood of distant brain failure, the need for WBRT or the likelihood of neurological death in this series.


Subject(s)
Brain Neoplasms/secondary , Brain Neoplasms/surgery , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/statistics & numerical data , Radiosurgery/mortality , Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted/statistics & numerical data , Radiotherapy, Image-Guided/mortality , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Brain Neoplasms/mortality , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prevalence , Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted/methods , Survival Analysis , Survival Rate , Treatment Outcome , Young Adult
2.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys ; 78(4): 1142-6, 2010 Nov 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20832185

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To investigate the efficacy of 3.0-T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for detecting brain metastases for stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) planning. METHODS AND MATERIALS: All adult patients scheduled for SRS treatment for brain metastases at our institution between October 2005 and January 2008 were eligible for analysis. All patients underwent radiosurgery treatment planning 3.0-T MRI on the day of scheduled radiosurgery and a diagnostic 1.5-T MRI in the days or weeks prior to radiosurgery for comparison. Both scans were interpreted by neuroradiologists who reported their findings in the radiology reports. We performed a retrospective review of the radiology reports to determine the number of brain metastases identified using each MRI system. RESULTS: Of 254 patients scheduled for treatment from October 2005 to January 2008, 138 patients had radiology reports that explicitly described the number of metastases identified on both scans. With a median interval of 17 days (range, 1-82) between scans, the number of metastases detected using 1.5-T MRI system ranged from 1 to 5 and from 1 to 8 using the 3.0 T-MRI system. Twenty-two percent of patients were found to have a greater number of metastases with the 3.0 T-MRI system. The difference in number of metastases detected between the two scans for the entire cohort ranged from 0 to 6. Neither histology (p = 0.52 by chi-sq test) nor time between scans (p = 0.62 by linear regression) were significantly associated with the difference in number of metastases between scans. CONCLUSIONS: The 3.0-T MRI system appears to be superior to a 1.5-T MRI system for detecting brain metastases, which may have significant implications in determining the appropriate treatment modality. Our findings suggest the need for a prospectively designed study to further evaluate the use of a 3.0 T-MRI system for stereotactic radiosurgery planning in the treatment of brain metastases.


Subject(s)
Brain Neoplasms/secondary , Brain Neoplasms/surgery , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods , Radiosurgery , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Analysis of Variance , Chi-Square Distribution , Humans , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/statistics & numerical data , Medical Records/statistics & numerical data , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Time Factors , Young Adult
3.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys ; 78(3): 844-8, 2010 Nov 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20171804

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The Collaborative Ocular Melanoma Study (COMS) established iodine-125 plaque brachytherapy as an accepted standard treatment for medium-size choroidal melanoma. In the COMS, the prescription dose was 85 Gy. This is a retrospective review of our outcomes in patients treated with lower doses than those used in the COMS. METHODS AND MATERIALS: From 1990 to 2004, 62 patients were treated with iodine-125 plaque brachytherapy for choroidal melanoma. COMS eye plaques were used with dose prescribed to the apex of the tumor. The median and average dose rates at the tumor apex were 63.5 cGy/h and 62.7 cGy/h, respectively. The median and average total doses were 63.0 Gy and 62.5 Gy (range, 56-69 Gy), respectively. The median and mean durations of implant were 100.0 hours and 101.1 hours (range, 71-165 hours). RESULTS: Median follow-up time was 58.2 months. The 5-year outcomes including overall survival, disease-free survival, cause-specific survival, local failure, secondary enucleation rate, and visual acuity (VA) <20/200 were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Overall, there were 7 local failures, 4 distant failures, and 10 secondary enucleations (6 due to local failure and 4 due to treatment complications). Univariate analysis was performed to identify significant prognostic factors associated with disease-free survival (baseline VA in tumor eye, tumor shape), cause-specific survival (diabetic retinopathy), local failure (none found), secondary enucleation rate (diabetic retinopathy, basal tumor dimension) and VA <20/200 (diabetic retinopathy, tumor shape, age, retinal detachment, treatment depth, and history of vision-limiting condition). CONCLUSIONS: Our survival and local control outcomes are comparable to those of the COMS. However, VA at 5 years seems to be better. Lower doses of radiation could potentially lead to better visual outcomes.


Subject(s)
Brachytherapy/methods , Choroid Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Iodine Radioisotopes/therapeutic use , Melanoma/radiotherapy , Aged , Analysis of Variance , Cause of Death , Choroid Neoplasms/mortality , Choroid Neoplasms/pathology , Choroid Neoplasms/surgery , Disease-Free Survival , Eye Enucleation/statistics & numerical data , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Melanoma/mortality , Melanoma/pathology , Melanoma/surgery , Middle Aged , Prognosis , Radiotherapy Dosage , Retrospective Studies , Time Factors , Tumor Burden , Visual Acuity
4.
J Support Oncol ; 5(9): 427-33, 436, 2007 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18019850

ABSTRACT

A symptom cluster comprises three or more concurrent symptoms. There is a paucity of symptom cluster research in cancer patients. Data from a previously conducted clinical trial were analyzed to search for symptom clusters. This phase III, placebo-controlled, double-blind, prospective, randomized clinical trial of 66 patients assessed the effect of prophylactic d-threo-methylphenidate (d-MPH) on quality of life (QOL) in newly diagnosed brain tumor patients receiving brain radiation therapy. Patients received 5-15 mg of d-MPH or placebo twice daily starting on week 1 of radiation therapy and continuing for 8 weeks post radiotherapy. QOL data were collected at baseline; the end of radiation therapy; and 4, 8, and 12 weeks following radiation therapy using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT), the FACT-Brain subscale, and the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale. Exploratory factor analysis, multidimensional scaling (MDS), and cluster analysis were used to search for symptom clusters. The trial failed to show a treatment effect; patients receiving d-MPH or placebo were analyzed together to search for clusters. Two symptom clusters were identified using exploratory factor analysis--a language cluster including difficulty reading, writing, and finding the right words and a mood cluster including feelings of sadness, anxiety, and depressed mood; these clusters were supported by MDS and cluster analysis. Our results suggest that interventions that target both cognitive function and mood should be considered in this patient population. Further research on symptom clusters in brain tumor patients is needed.


Subject(s)
Brain Neoplasms/psychology , Central Nervous System Stimulants/therapeutic use , Methylphenidate/therapeutic use , Quality of Life , Adult , Affect/drug effects , Aged , Brain Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Central Nervous System Stimulants/chemistry , Cluster Analysis , Double-Blind Method , Factor Analysis, Statistical , Female , Humans , Language , Male , Methylphenidate/chemistry , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Stereoisomerism
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL