Effects of liraglutide on intrapancreatic fat deposition in patients with type 2 diabetes.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Ectopic fat deposition is associated with worsening of glycemic control. This study was conducted to determine whether liraglutide reduces ectopic fat deposition, especially in pancreas, in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D). METHODS: We retrospectively recruited T2D patients who underwent abdominal unenhanced CT scans both before and after administration of liraglutide (N = 13) or glimepiride (N = 29). Using CT values of pancreas (P), liver (L) and spleen (S), we defined the indices of intrapancreatic and liver fat as P-S value and L-S value, respectively. Increase of each value suggests the reduction of each fat deposition. RESULTS: The values of HbA1c (p = 0.0017) and body weight (p = 0.0081) decreased, and L-S (p = 0.0024) increased significantly after administration of liraglutide compared with those at baseline. Similarly, P-S tended to increase in the liraglutide group (p = 0.0547) and increased significantly in the liraglutide subgroup with fatty pancreas (p = 0.0303), defined as having baseline P-S less than -5. In the glimepiride group, P-S did not increase regardless of baseline P-S. Among patients with fatty pancreas, administration of liraglutide tended to be a significant factor for the change in P-S after adjustment for the change in HbA1c (p = 0.1090) and the change in visceral fat area (p = 0.1030). CONCLUSIONS: Intrapancreatic fat deposition was decreased after treatment with liraglutide, but not glimepiride, in T2D patients with fatty pancreas. Liraglutide might reduce intrapancreatic fat deposition independently of decreases in HbA1c and visceral fat volume.

[Current concept of insulin therapy intensification, and the role of human regular insulin and rapid-acting insulin analogs in insulin treatment].

The evolution of insulin therapy from animal insulin to recombinant human regular insulin has improved diabetes treatment. Generating of rapid-acting insulin analogs, mimicking physiologic insulin action enables us to provide better control of post-prandial glucose level and lower incidence of hypoglycemia compared with human regular insulin. These rapid-acting insulin analogs show lower susceptibility of insulin precipitation and catheter occlusions, and are suitable for insulin pump therapy of continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion. Insulin lispro and insulin aspart are also applicable for diabetic patients with pregnancy, requiring excellent glycemic control. In some studies, stepwise addition of prandial insulin, as well as full basal-bolus regimen can improve glycemic control with less hypoglycemia. Treatment intensification with rapid-acting insulin analogs may offer a proper method to reach glycemic goals.

A renoprotective effect of low dose losartan in patients with type 2 diabetes.

It has been reported that angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB) improves proteinuria in diabetic patients. However, whether this is a direct effect of ARB or through lowering blood pressure is still controversial. The aim of this study is to determine the direct effect of ARB on diabetic nephropathy. Thirty-four type 2 diabetic patients with early kidney damage were divided into two groups: losartan group (n=17) and control group (n=17). In losartan group, low dose (25mg) of losartan was administered once daily for a year. Blood pressure at home, blood pressure at office and urinary albumin/creatinine ratio (UACR) were measured before and during the treatment. After a 1-year observation, the increment of UACR was significantly smaller in losartan group than that in control group [-23.8+/-13.7 mg/gCr vs. 15.9+/-13.2mg/gCr, mean+/-S.E.M., P=0.0114]. Mean blood pressure levels did not change before and during the observation period both in losartan group and control group, though only systolic blood pressure at home decreased slightly but significantly. There were no significant differences in the levels of HbA(1c), fasting plasma glucose, total cholesterol, triglyceride and body mass index between the two groups. The observed decrease in UACR in the losartan-treated group might be attributed to a direct renoprotective action in addition to a subtle decrease in systolic blood pressure at home.