Ultra-low-dose chest CT performance for the detection of viral pneumonia patterns during the COVID-19 outbreak period: a monocentric experience.

BACKGROUND: Ultra low dose chest computed tomography (CT) acquisitions have been used for selected emergency room patients with acute dyspnea or minor thoracic trauma. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic performance of ultra-low-dose (ULD) chest CT for detecting viral pneumonia patterns compared to standard (STD) dose chest CT. METHODS: All consecutive adult patients with two non-enhanced chest CT acquisitions, one STD and one ULD, for suspicion of viral pneumonia between March 5th and April 2nd 2020 were included. CT results were divided into two groups: non-viral pneumonia CT or compatible with viral pneumonia CT based on viral pneumonia CT patterns: ground-glass opacity (GGO), consolidation, crazy paving, air bronchogram signs and fibrous stripes. The diagnostic performance of ULD CT for suspicion of viral pneumonia was evaluated. For CTs compatible with viral pneumonia, CT pattern detection on ULD CT was assessed and STD CT was used as a reference. RESULTS: The study included 380 patients with 97 CTs (25.5%) compatible with viral pneumonia. The mean effective doses (EDs) were 1.66 (1.29; 2.18) mSv for STD and 0.20 (0.18; 0.22) mSv for ULD CT (P<0.001). The sensitivity and specificity of ULD CT for viral pneumonia detection were 98.9% and 99.0%, respectively. GGO, consolidation and fibrous stripes were equally visible in STD and ULD in 100% (n=97), 36% (n=35) and 23% (n=22) of compatible viral pneumonia-CT patients, respectively. Air bronchogram sign detection was equivalent, concerning 23% (n=22) of patients in STD and 22% (n=21) in ULD. Crazy paving was visible in 24% (n=23) of patients in STD and only 8% (n=8) in ULD (P=0.003). CONCLUSIONS: In comparison to STD dose chest CT, ULD chest CT, with a mean reduction dose of 88.0%, has comparable diagnostic performance for detecting viral pneumonia on CT.

Impact of four kVp combinations available in a dual-source CT on the spectral performance of abdominal imaging: A task-based image quality assessment on phantom data.

PURPOSE: To compare the spectral performance of four combinations of kVp available in a third generation dual-source CT (DSCT) on abdominal imaging. METHODS: An image-quality phantom was scanned with a DSCT using four kVp pairs (tube "A" voltage/tube "B" voltage): 100/Sn150 kVp, 90/Sn150 kVp, 80/Sn150 kVp, and 70/Sn150 kVp, classic parameters and dose level for abdomen examination (CTDIvol : 11 mGy). The noise power spectrum (NPS) and the task-based transfer function (TTF) of two inserts were computed on virtual monochromatic images (VMIs) at 40/50/60/70 keV and for mixed, low-, and high-kVp images. Detectability index (d') was computed on VMIs and mixed images to model the detection task of liver metastasis (LM) and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Iodine quantification accuracy was assessed using the Root Mean Square Deviation (RMSDiodine ) and the iodine bias (IB). RESULTS: Noise magnitude decreased by -55%± 0% between 40 and 70 keV for all kVp pairs. Compared to 70/Sn150 kVp, noise magnitude was increased by 9% ± 0% with 80/Sn150 kVp, by 16% ± 1% with 90/Sn150 kVp and by 24%± 1% with 100/Sn150 kVp. The average NPS spatial frequency (fav ) shifted toward higher frequencies as energy level increased for all kVp pairs. Lowest fav values were found for 70/Sn150 kVp and highest for 100/Sn150 kVp. The value of TTF at 50% (f50 ) shifted toward lower frequencies with increasing energy level. The highest f50  values occurred for 100/Sn150 kVp and the lowest for 80/Sn150 kVp. For both lesions, d' was highest for 70/Sn150 kVp and lowest for 100/Sn150 kVp. Compared to 70/Sn150 kVp, d' decreased by -6% ± 3% with 80/Sn150 kVp, by -11% ± 2% with 90/Sn150 kVp and by -13%± 2% with 100/Sn150 kVp. For all acquisitions, the RSMDiodine and IB were the lowest for 100/Sn150 kVp (0.29 ± 0.10 mg/ml and 0.88 ± 0.30 mg/ml, respectively) and increased when the tube "A" voltage decreased (2.34 ± 0.29 mg/ml for 70/Sn150 kVp and 7.42 ± 0.51 mg/ml respectively). CONCLUSION: 70/Sn150 kVp presented the lowest image noise and highest detectability in VMIs of two small focal liver lesions. 100/Sn150 kVp presented the lowest image noise on mixed images and highest accuracy of iodine quantification in iodine images.

Ultra-low-dose CT versus radiographs for minor spine and pelvis trauma: a Bayesian analysis of accuracy.

OBJECTIVES: To compare diagnosis performance and effective dose of ultra-low-dose CT (ULD CT) versus radiographs in suspected spinal or pelvic ring or hip fracture for minor trauma. METHODS: ULD CT, in addition to radiography, was prospectively performed in consecutive patients admitted to the emergency department for minor traumas, during working hours over 2 months. Presence of a recent fracture was assessed by two blind radiologists independently. Sensitivities and specificities were estimated using the best valuable comparator (BVC) as a reference and using a latent class model in Bayesian inference (BLCM). Dosimetric indicators were recorded and effective doses (E) were calculated using conversion coefficient. RESULTS: Eighty areas were analyzed in 69 patients, including 22 dorsal spine, 28 lumbar spine, and 30 pelvic ring/hip. Thirty-six fractures (45%) were observed. Applying the BVC method, depending on location, ULD CT sensitivity was 80 to 100% for reader 1 and 85 to 100% for reader 2, whereas radiographic sensitivity was 60 to 85% for reader 1 and 50 to 92% for reader 2. With BLCM approach for reader 2, ULD CT sensitivity for all locations/dorsal spine/lumbar spine and pelvic ring-hip was 87.1/75.9/84.2/76.9% respectively. Corresponding radiograph sensitivity was 73.8, 54.8, 80.4, and 68.7%. Effective doses of ULD CT were similar to radiographs for dorsal and hip locations whereas for lumbar spine, ULD CT effective dose was 1.83 ± 0.59 mSv compared with 0.96 ± 0.59 mSv (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Sensitivity for fracture detection was higher for ULD CT compared with radiographs with an effective dose comparable to radiographs. KEY POINTS: • Ultra-low-dose spine and pelvis CT demonstrates better fracture detection when compared with radiographs. • The effective dose of ultra-low-dose spine and pelvis CT scan and radiographs is comparable. • Replacement of radiographs by ULD CT in daily practice for trauma patients is an option to consider and should be evaluated by a randomized trial.

Systematic review and meta-analysis on the impact of lung cancer screening by low-dose computed tomography.

INTRODUCTION: Lung cancer (LC) has the highest cancer mortality worldwide with poor prognosis. Screening with low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) in populations highly exposed to tobacco has been proposed to improve LC prognosis. Our objective was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy of screening by LDCT compared with any other intervention in populations who reported tobacco consumption for more than 15 years on LC and overall mortality. METHODS: We searched randomised controlled trials (RCTs) studying screening by LDCT compared with any other intervention in a population who reported an average smoking history greater than 15 pack-years from inception until the 19th February 2018 using Medline and Cochrane Library databases. Publication selection and data extraction were made independently by two double-blind reviewers. RESULTS: Seven RCTs were included in the meta-analysis which corresponds to 84,558 participants. A significant relative reduction of LC-specific mortality of 17% (risk ratio [RR] = 0.83, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.76-0.91) and a relative reduction of overall mortality of 4% (RR = 0.96, 95% CI: 0.92-1.00) was observed in the screening group compared with the control group. CONCLUSION: In populations highly exposed to tobacco, screening by LDCT reduces lung cancer mortality.

[Acute and chronic pathologies of the thoracic aorta: From diagnosis to treatment]. / Pathologie aortique thoracique aiguë et chronique : du diagnostic au traitement.

Aortic pathologies benefit from imaging innovation and interventional radiology developments in order to improve patient management. At the early phase, vital risk should be considered. Whole body CT scan evaluate the complete aorta and its branches to assess the pathology and to choose the best approach between surgery or interventional radiology (fenestration, stentgraft, peripheral stenting). Algorithms, based on the understanding of the complications mechanisms and evolutive risk, modified the management specifically for aortic dissection. At chronic phase, GPs and angiologists should follow their patients in order to detect aortic complications and to treat cardiovascular risk factors. MRA is well indicated if possible.