Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
1.
J Low Genit Tract Dis ; 26(3): 283-286, 2022 Jul 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35467577

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The aims of this article were to describe 2 patients with a pathological diagnosis of differentiated exophytic vulvar intraepithelial lesion and to summarize the literature regarding this relatively new diagnosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The existing literature was searched on December 1, 2021, using the MEDLINE database (1966-2021), and all combinations of the following search terms were used: "differentiated exophytic vulvar intraepithelial lesion" and "differentiated vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia." RESULTS: Patients were postmenopausal and reported persistent vulvar itch associated with white hypertrophic plaques. Initial biopsies did not identify differentiated exophytic vulvar intraepithelial lesion. Invasive squamous cell carcinoma was found in both cases after surgical excision. CONCLUSIONS: Differentiated vulvar intraepithelial lesions and invasive squamous cell carcinoma should be considered in the differential diagnosis of vulvar itch associated with hypertrophic plaques in postmenopausal women. Excision of suspicious plaques is recommended for definitive diagnosis.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma in Situ , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell , Vulvar Diseases , Vulvar Neoplasms , Carcinoma in Situ/diagnosis , Carcinoma in Situ/pathology , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/diagnosis , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/pathology , Female , Humans , Vulva/pathology , Vulvar Diseases/diagnosis , Vulvar Diseases/pathology , Vulvar Diseases/surgery , Vulvar Neoplasms/diagnosis , Vulvar Neoplasms/pathology , Vulvar Neoplasms/surgery
2.
J Low Genit Tract Dis ; 23(1): 65-70, 2019 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30252710

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to summarize and review the evidence for the efficacy and safety of adipose-derived stem cells (ADSCs) and platelet-rich plasma (PRP) for the treatment of vulvar lichen sclerosus (LS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: PubMed/MEDLINE, Ovid, Web of Science, and clinicaltrials.gov were searched from inception up to May 7, 2018. RESULTS: Seven observational studies were identified, with a total of 98 patients. Both ADSCs and PRP were reported to improve symptoms, quality of life measures, as well as clinical and histological signs of vulvar LS. There is a strong risk of biased estimates of treatment effect. CONCLUSIONS: Current evidence is weak for ADSCs and/or PRP as treatment for vulvar LS. Further research is needed before recommending this therapy.


Subject(s)
Cell Transplantation/methods , Platelet-Rich Plasma , Vulvar Lichen Sclerosus/therapy , Adult , Aged , Cell Transplantation/adverse effects , Female , Humans , Mesenchymal Stem Cells/physiology , Middle Aged , Observational Studies as Topic , Treatment Outcome
3.
J Low Genit Tract Dis ; 22(3): 212-218, 2018 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29762428

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to determine regression rates of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) 2 and 3 in women younger than 24 years, followed conservatively for up to 24 months. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a retrospective chart review of colposcopy patients in clinic database based on the following: (1) younger than 24 years at first visit; (2) first visit January 1, 2010, to May 31, 2013, and at least 1 follow-up visit after diagnosis; (3) histologic diagnosis of CIN2+; and (4) optimal conservative management (observation for up to 24 months or to 24 years, whichever occurred first). Patient information and clinical/pathologic data were extracted from charts to examine patient characteristics and treatment outcomes, CIN2+ regression rates, median times to regression for CIN2 versus CIN3 (Kaplan-Meier survival analysis), and predictors of regression (multivariate logistic regression analysis). RESULTS: A total of 154 women met criteria. The most severe histological diagnoses were CIN2 in 99 (64.3%), CIN3 in 51 (33.1%), and adenocarcinoma in situ in 4 (2.6%). Adenocarcinoma in situ was immediately treated. In follow-up, CIN2 regressed to CIN1 or negative in 74 women (74.7%)-median time to regression, 10.8 months. Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 3 regressed in 11 women (21.6%)-median time to regression not reached (last follow-up censored at 52.7 months). Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2 on biopsy, low grade referral Pap, and younger age predicted regression. Overall, 49 women (31.8%) were treated. CONCLUSIONS: Conservative management should continue to be recommended to young women with CIN2. Rigorous retention mechanisms are required to ensure that these women return for follow-up.


Subject(s)
Conservative Treatment/methods , Squamous Intraepithelial Lesions of the Cervix/therapy , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/therapy , Colposcopy , Female , Histocytochemistry , Humans , Retrospective Studies , Squamous Intraepithelial Lesions of the Cervix/pathology , Treatment Outcome , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/pathology , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...