ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Overdrainage after cerebrospinal fluid diversion remains a significant morbidity. The hydrostatic, gravitational force in the upright position can aggravate this. Siphon control (SC) mechanisms, as well as programmable and flow regulating devices, were developed to counteract this. However, limited studies have evaluated their safety and efficacy. In this study, direct comparisons of the complication rates between siphon control (SC) and non-SC (NSC), fixed versus programmable, and flow- versus pressure regulating valves are undertaken. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed over all shunt implantations from January 2011 to December 2016 within the Houston Methodist Hospital system. Complication rates within 6 months of the operative date, including infection, subdural hematoma, malfunction, and any other shunt-related complication, were analyzed via Fisher's exact test, with P < 0.05 regarded as significant. Subgroup analyses based on diagnoses - normal pressure hydrocephalus (HCP), pseudotumor cerebri, or other HCP - were also performed. RESULTS: The overall shunt-related complication rate in this study was 19%. Overall rates of infection, shunt failure, and readmission within 180 days were 3%, 11%, and 34%, respectively. No difference was seen between SC and NSC groups in any complication rate overall or on subgroup analyses. When comparing fixed versus programmable and flow- versus pressure-regulating valves, the latter in each analysis had significantly lower malfunction and total complication rates. CONCLUSIONS: Programmable and pressure regulating devices may lead to lower shunt malfunction and total complication rates. Proper patient selection should guide valve choice. Future prospective studies may further elucidate the difference in complication rates between these various shunt designs.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Meningiomas of the spinal canal comprise up to 40% of all spinal tumors. The standard management of these tumors is gross total resection. The outcome and extent of resection depends on location, size, patient's neurologic status, and experience of the surgeon. Heavily calcified spinal meningiomas often pose a challenge for achieving gross total resection without cord injury. OBJECTIVE: To report our experience with the BoneScalpel Micro-shaver to resect heavily calcified areas of spinal meningiomas adherent to the spinal cord without significant cord manipulation, achieving gross total resection and outstanding clinical results. METHODS: Seventy-nine and 82-yr-old females presented with progressive leg weakness, paresthesias, and gait instability. Magnetic resonance imaging of the thoracic spine showed a homogenous enhancing intradural extramedullary mass with mass effect on the spinal cord. Midline bilateral laminectomy was performed, and the dura was open in midline. The lateral portion of the tumor away from the spinal cord was resected with Cavitron Ultrasonic Surgical Aspirator while the BoneScalpel Micro-shaver (power level 5 and 30% irrigation) was brought into the field for the calcified portion of the tumor adherent to the spinal cord. RESULTS: Gross total resection was achieved for both cases. At the 2-wk postoperative visit, both patients reported complete recovery of their leg weakness with significant improvement in paresthesias and ataxia. CONCLUSION: The ultrasonic osteotome equipped with a microhook tip appears to be a safe surgical instrument allowing for effective resection of spinal meningiomas or other heavily calcified spinal masses not easily removed by usual surgical instrumentation.
