A systematic review of the diagnostic accuracy of epidural wave form analysis to identify the epidural space in surgical and labor patients.

INTRODUCTION: Epidural failure due to misidentification of the epidural space is not uncommon. Epidural wave form analysis has been suggested to identify the epidural space. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: A systematic literature search (Medline, Epub, Embase.com (Embase plus Medline), Cochrane Central, Web of Science, and Google Scholar) was performed to identify studies comparing epidural wave form analysis (index test) to epidural analgesia (reference test). EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: Eight studies (3901 patients) were retrieved that provided data on diagnostic accuracy. These studies had a low risk of bias and of applicability concerns, as assessed by the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies (QUADAS-2) tool. One study did not observe an epidural wave form in parturients, a finding that was not corroborated in another study. Because the reference test was different across the studies we decided not aggregate the data. The sensitivity values of the individual studies varied between 0.81 and 1.00, for the specificity values between 0.42 and 1.00 were found. CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that epidural wave form analysis is a reliable method for identification of the epidural space that could become a useful adjunct especially in anticipated difficult catheter placements or in teaching situations. Further research is warranted to define the role of epidural wave form analysis in pregnant women.

Humanitarian otologic missions: long-term surgical results.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine the efficacy of treating chronic ear disease by performing a single surgical intervention in the austere environment of a developing nation. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Data were collected from retrospective chart reviews on 121 patients who underwent surgical treatment of chronic ear disease during humanitarian surgical missions in South and Central America. Surgical outcomes and clinical course were assessed at 10 to 12 months after the initial surgery. RESULTS: A total of 117 patients were included in the study. Follow-up records were available for 75 patients (64%). A total of 20 surgeries were performed for dry perforations (group 1), 30 for chronically draining ears (group 2), and 25 for cholesteatomas (group 3). Surgical success was determined as 60 percent, 74 percent, and 92 percent for groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Surgical results during international otologic outreach missions to developing nations fall within the results expected in developed nations.