ABSTRACT
Introduction: Antidepressants are the most common treatment for major depression. Also, psychotherapy is used for the treatment of depression. Tricyclic antidepressants are among the most frequently used medications to treat depression, with many known side effects. Therefore, checking and replacing other suitable drugs is essential in order to reduce side effects. Thus, the present study aimed to compare the efficacy of Modafinil and Citalopram in the treatment of patients with major depressive disorder. Methods:This interventional study was performed in 2019 on 30 people aged 18 to 65 years who had been diagnosed with a major depressive disorder based on DSM-5 criteria as well as the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS), on which they got a score above 25. Subjects were randomly divided into two groups: the first group received Modafinil tablets (200 mg once daily, in the morning) and the second group Citalopram (20-40 mg/day). A Chi-square test was used to analyze the qualitative findings, and an independent t-test was used to compare quantitative data. Results:The results showed that changes in HDRS score were significant over time (P <0.05). The mean difference in HDRS scores was significant in all stages among the study subjects (P <0.05). However, there were no significant differences in HDRS scores between groups in terms of gender, age, marital status, education, occupation, and economic status, either before treatment or three and six weeks after treatment. Conclusion:This was the first comparative study of Modafinil and Citalopram efficacy in treating patients with major depressive disorder. Larger-scale, longer-term clinical trials, including long-term discontinuation trials and placebo-controlled parallel treatment studies, are further necessary. Also, a larger sample size with a placebo comparison is recommended.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: In this study, we compared the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) among patients with spinal cord injury (SCI) using different bladder emptying methods including normal spontaneous micturition (NSM), micturition with assisted maneuvers (MAM), aseptic intermittent catheterization by patient (IC-P), aseptic IC by an attendant/caregiver (IC-A) and indwelling catheterization. DESIGN: Cross-sectional. SETTING: Tertiary rehabilitation center. PARTICIPANTS: Patients referred to Brain and Spinal Cord Injury Research Center between 2012 and 2014. OUTCOME MEASURES: HRQoL was assessed by Short Form Health Survey (SF-36). Hierarchical regression analysis with adjustment for probable confounders (demographic and injury-related variables) was performed to assess the relationship between bladder-emptying method and total SF-36 score. RESULTS: Patients with injury at cervical sections had significantly lower scores in domain of physical functioning (PF), physical component summary (PCS) and total score (P: 0.001, <0.0001 and 0.027, respectively). Longer time since injury was associated with better scores of PCS, Mental component summary (MCS) and total score (P: 0.002, <0.0001 and 0.003, respectively). Regression analysis showed that the effect of bladder-emptying method on total score of SF-36 was significant (P < 0.0001) and this relationship remained significant after adjustment for probable confounders in the second step of hierarchical regression analysis (R: 0.923, R2: 0.852, Adjusted R2: 0.847, P < 0.0001). Patients with NSM had the highest scores in SF-36 instrument and individuals with indwelling catheterization had the poorest HRQoL in all domains. CONCLUSION: This study shows that the type of bladder management method affects HRQoL significantly in patients with SCI. Intermittent catheterization are recommended to be administered instead of indwelling catheterization to improve HRQoL.
