Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Infect ; 80(5): 527-535, 2020 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31981638

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Bedaquiline is an effective drug used to treat MDR and XDR tuberculosis, providing high cure rates in complex therapy. Mutations in the mmpR (rv0678) and atpE genes are associated with reduced susceptibility to bedaquiline and have been identified in both in vitro selected strains and clinical isolates. However, the phenotypic criteria used to detect bedaquiline resistance have yet to be established due to the collection of few clinical isolates from patients receiving bedaquiline-containing treatment regimens. METHODS: One hundred eighty-two clinical isolates from 74 patients receiving bedaquiline and 163 isolates from 107 patients not exposed to bedaquiline were analysed. The bedaquiline MICs were tested using serial dilutions on 7H11 agar plates and the Bactec MGIT 960 system. The mmpR and atpE genes were sequenced by Sanger sequencing. RESULTS: The 7H11 agar method allowed for rapid discrimination between mutated and wild-type isolates and between exposed and non-exposed isolates. Seventy-three percent of bedaquiline-exposed isolates, as well as 91% of isolates with mutations, had an elevated bedaquiline MIC (≥ 0.12 mg/L on 7H11 media) compared to the reference isolates (89% had an MIC ≤ 0.03 mg/L). Previously reported in vitro-selected mutants (E61D and A63P) and novel AtpE substitutions (G25S and D28G) were observed in the clinical isolates. Substitutions in codon 63 of AtpE were likely associated with a higher bedaquiline MIC. Five new cases of pre-existing reduced susceptibility to bedaquiline, accompanied by mmpR mutations in most isolates, without a history of bedaquiline treatment were identified. CONCLUSIONS: Bedaquiline treatment leads to an elevated bedaquiline MIC and the acquisition of mmpR and atpE gene mutations in tuberculosis strains. The standardisation of bedaquiline phenotypic susceptibility testing is urgently needed based on observed discrepancies between our study and previous studies and differences in solid and liquid media MIC determinations.


Subject(s)
Mycobacterium tuberculosis , Tuberculosis, Multidrug-Resistant , Tuberculosis , Antitubercular Agents/pharmacology , Antitubercular Agents/therapeutic use , Diarylquinolines/pharmacology , Humans , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Mutation , Mycobacterium tuberculosis/genetics , Tuberculosis/drug therapy , Tuberculosis, Multidrug-Resistant/drug therapy
2.
J Antimicrob Chemother ; 72(7): 1901-1906, 2017 07 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28387862

ABSTRACT

Objectives: To study the isolates with acquired resistance to bedaquiline and linezolid that were obtained from patients enrolled in a clinical study of a novel therapy regimen for drug-resistant TB in Moscow, Russia. Methods: Linezolid resistance was detected using MGIT 960 with a critical concentration of 1 mg/L. The MIC of bedaquiline was determined using the proportion method. To identify genetic determinants of resistance, sequencing of the mmpR ( Rv0678 ), atpE , atpC , pepQ , Rv1979c , rrl , rplC and rplD loci was performed. Results: A total of 85 isolates from 27 patients with acquired resistance to linezolid and reduced susceptibility to bedaquiline (MIC ≥0.06 mg/L) were tested. Most mutations associated with a high MIC of bedaquiline were found in the mmpR gene. We identified for the first time two patients whose clinical isolates had substitutions D28N and A63V in AtpE, which had previously been found only in in vitro -selected strains. Several patients had isolates with elevated MICs of bedaquiline prior to treatment; four of them also bore mutations in mmpR , indicating the presence of some hidden factors in bedaquiline resistance acquisition. The C154R substitution in ribosomal protein L3 was the most frequent in the linezolid-resistant strains. Mutations in the 23S rRNA gene (g2294a and g2814t) associated with linezolid resistance were also found in two isolates. Heteroresistance was identified in ∼40% of samples, which reflects the complex nature of resistance acquisition. Conclusions: The introduction of novel drugs into treatment must be accompanied by continuous phenotypic susceptibility testing and the analysis of genetic determinants of resistance.


Subject(s)
Antitubercular Agents/pharmacology , Diarylquinolines/pharmacology , Linezolid/pharmacology , Mycobacterium tuberculosis/drug effects , Tuberculosis, Multidrug-Resistant/microbiology , Acetamides/therapeutic use , Antitubercular Agents/therapeutic use , Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial/genetics , Humans , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Moscow/epidemiology , Mutation , Mycobacterium tuberculosis/genetics , Mycobacterium tuberculosis/isolation & purification , Oxazolidinones/therapeutic use , Prospective Studies , Ribosomal Protein L3 , Tuberculosis, Multidrug-Resistant/drug therapy , Tuberculosis, Multidrug-Resistant/epidemiology
3.
PLoS One ; 11(11): e0167093, 2016.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27902737

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The goal of this study was to compare the consistency of three assays for the determination of the drug resistance of Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB) strains with various resistance profiles isolated from the Moscow region. METHODS: A total of 144 MTB clinical isolates with a strong bias toward drug resistance were examined using Bactec MGIT 960, Sensititre MycoTB, and a microarray-based molecular assay TB-TEST to detect substitutions in the rpoB, katG, inhA, ahpC, gyrA, gyrB, rrs, eis, and embB genes that are associated with resistance to rifampin, isoniazid, fluoroquinolones, second-line injectable drugs and ethambutol. RESULTS: The average correlation for the identification of resistant and susceptible isolates using the three methods was approximately 94%. An association of mutations detected with variable resistance levels was shown. We propose a change in the breakpoint minimal inhibitory concentration for kanamycin to less than 5 µg/ml in the Sensititre MycoTB system. A pairwise comparison of the minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of two different drugs revealed an increased correlation in the first-line drug group and a partial correlation in the second-line drug group, reflecting the history of the preferential simultaneous use of drugs from these groups. An increased correlation with the MICs was also observed for drugs sharing common resistance mechanisms. CONCLUSIONS: The quantitative measures of phenotypic drug resistance produced by the Sensititre MycoTB and the timely detection of mutations using the TB-TEST assay provide guidance for clinicians for the choice of the appropriate drug regimen.


Subject(s)
Antitubercular Agents/pharmacology , Drug Resistance, Bacterial/genetics , Microbial Sensitivity Tests/methods , Mycobacterium tuberculosis/drug effects , Mycobacterium tuberculosis/genetics , Oligonucleotide Array Sequence Analysis , Antitubercular Agents/therapeutic use , Genotype , Humans , Moscow , Mutation , Mycobacterium tuberculosis/isolation & purification , Mycobacterium tuberculosis/physiology , Phenotype , Tuberculosis/drug therapy
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...