Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Comput Intell Neurosci ; 2022: 6138490, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36072725

ABSTRACT

One of the most prevalent diseases that can be initially identified by visual inspection and further identified with the use of dermoscopic examination and other testing is skin cancer. Since eye observation provides the earliest opportunity for artificial intelligence to intercept various skin images, some skin lesion classification algorithms based on deep learning and annotated skin photos display improved outcomes. The researcher used a variety of strategies and methods to identify and stop diseases earlier. All of them yield positive results for identifying and categorizing diseases, but proper disease categorization is still lacking. Computer-aided diagnosis is one of the most crucial methods for more accurate disease detection, although it is rarely used in dermatology. For Feature Extraction, we introduced Spectral Centroid Magnitude (SCM). The given dataset is classified using an enhanced convolutional neural network; the first stage of preprocessing uses a median filter, and the final stage compares the accuracy results to the current method.


Subject(s)
Melanoma , Skin Diseases , Artificial Intelligence , Dermoscopy/methods , Humans , Melanoma/pathology , Skin/pathology
2.
Biomed Res Int ; 2022: 2318101, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35845952

ABSTRACT

Mesothelioma is a dangerous, violent cancer, which forms a protecting layer around inner tissues such as the lungs, stomach, and heart. We investigate numerous AI methodologies and consider the exact DM conclusion outcomes in this study, which focuses on DM determination. K-nearest neighborhood, linear-discriminant analysis, Naive Bayes, decision-tree, random forest, support vector machine, and logistic regression analyses have been used in clinical decision support systems in the detection of mesothelioma. To test the accuracy of the evaluated categorizers, the researchers used a dataset of 350 instances with 35 highlights and six execution measures. LDA, NB, KNN, SVM, DT, LogR, and RF have precisions of 65%, 70%, 92%, 100%, 100%, 100%, and 100%, correspondingly. In count, the calculated complication of individual approaches has been evaluated. Every process is chosen on the basis of its characterization, exactness, and calculated complications. SVM, DT, LogR, and RF outclass the others and, unexpectedly, earlier research.


Subject(s)
Mesothelioma , Support Vector Machine , Algorithms , Bayes Theorem , Discriminant Analysis , Humans , Mesothelioma/diagnosis , Mesothelioma/therapy
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...